Re: linux-next: rebase of the scsi-mkp tree

2021-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell 
Hi James,

On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:21:20 -0800 James Bottomley 
 wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 11:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > I notice that you have rebased the scsi-mkp tree.  Unfotunately James
> > has already merged part of the old version of the scsi-mkp tree int
> > the scsi tree so that commits f69d02e37a85..39ae3edda325 in the scsi-
> > mkp tree are the same patches as commits fe07bfda2fb9..100d21c4ff29
> > in the scsi tree.  
> 
> It's just the flux from Linus announcing he's screwed up -rc1 and we
> shouldn't base on it ... it should all be fixed soon.

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgptctnHYopQm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: linux-next: rebase of the scsi-mkp tree

2021-03-04 Thread James Bottomley 
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 11:04 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
> I notice that you have rebased the scsi-mkp tree.  Unfotunately James
> has already merged part of the old version of the scsi-mkp tree int
> the scsi tree so that commits f69d02e37a85..39ae3edda325 in the scsi-
> mkp tree are the same patches as commits fe07bfda2fb9..100d21c4ff29
> in the scsi tree.

It's just the flux from Linus announcing he's screwed up -rc1 and we
shouldn't base on it ... it should all be fixed soon.

James



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

linux-next: rebase of the scsi-mkp tree

2021-03-04 Thread Stephen Rothwell 
Hi Martin,

I notice that you have rebased the scsi-mkp tree.  Unfotunately James has
already merged part of the old version of the scsi-mkp tree int the scsi
tree so that commits f69d02e37a85..39ae3edda325 in the scsi-mkp tree are
the same patches as commits fe07bfda2fb9..100d21c4ff29 in the scsi tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell


pgpukuRJykO0a.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature