Re: memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion

2006-11-17 Thread Yasunori Goto
Hello.

> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:
(snip)
> but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:
(snip)
> (sic: duplicate function above)

Indeed. It is strange. This is a patch for it.

Thanks for your report!

Bye.



This is to fix compile error of x86-64 memory hotplug without
any NUMA option.

  CC  arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_phys
addr_to_nid' was here
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_physaddr_to_
nid' was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1

I confirmed compile completion with !NUMA, (NUMA & !ACPI_NUMA),
or (NUMA & ACPI_NUMA).

This patch is for 2.6.19-rc5-mm2.

Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



 arch/x86_64/mm/init.c |9 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: 19-rc5-mm2/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c
===
--- 19-rc5-mm2.orig/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c   2006-11-17 22:31:30.0 
+0900
+++ 19-rc5-mm2/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c2006-11-17 22:31:40.0 +0900
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(remove_memory);
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
 int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
 {
return 0;
@@ -504,13 +504,6 @@ int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
 #endif
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
-int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
-{
-   return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
 #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE

-- 
Yasunori Goto 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion

2006-11-17 Thread Yasunori Goto
Hello.

 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:
(snip)
 but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:
(snip)
 (sic: duplicate function above)

Indeed. It is strange. This is a patch for it.

Thanks for your report!

Bye.



This is to fix compile error of x86-64 memory hotplug without
any NUMA option.

  CC  arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_phys
addr_to_nid' was here
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_physaddr_to_
nid' was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1

I confirmed compile completion with !NUMA, (NUMA  !ACPI_NUMA),
or (NUMA  ACPI_NUMA).

This patch is for 2.6.19-rc5-mm2.

Signed-off-by: Yasunori Goto [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 arch/x86_64/mm/init.c |9 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: 19-rc5-mm2/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c
===
--- 19-rc5-mm2.orig/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c   2006-11-17 22:31:30.0 
+0900
+++ 19-rc5-mm2/arch/x86_64/mm/init.c2006-11-17 22:31:40.0 +0900
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(remove_memory);
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA)  defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
 int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
 {
return 0;
@@ -504,13 +504,6 @@ int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
 #endif
 
-#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
-int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
-{
-   return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
 #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_RESERVE

-- 
Yasunori Goto 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion

2006-11-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:25:20 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:

> 
> 2.6.19-rc5-mm2:
> 
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
> #else
> static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
> {
>   return 0;
> }
> #endif
> 
> but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:
> 
> #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
> {
>   return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
> #endif
> 
> #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
> {
>   return 0;
> }
> #endif
> 
> (sic: duplicate function above)
> 
> The CONFIG_NUMA vs. CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA seems to cause this build error:
> 
>   CC  arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
> arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 
> 'memory_add_phys
> addr_to_nid' was here
> arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
> arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 
> 'memory_add_physaddr_to_
> nid' was here
> make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1
> make: *** [arch/x86_64/mm] Error 2


Actually no flavor of NUMA is set:
http://oss.oracle.com/~rdunlap/configs/config-numa-err

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion

2006-11-16 Thread Randy Dunlap

2.6.19-rc5-mm2:

include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
#else
static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
return 0;
}
#endif

but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:

#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
#endif

#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
return 0;
}
#endif

(sic: duplicate function above)

The CONFIG_NUMA vs. CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA seems to cause this build error:

  CC  arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_phys
addr_to_nid' was here
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_physaddr_to_
nid' was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/mm] Error 2

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion

2006-11-16 Thread Randy Dunlap

2.6.19-rc5-mm2:

include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
#else
static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
return 0;
}
#endif

but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:

#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
#endif

#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
{
return 0;
}
#endif

(sic: duplicate function above)

The CONFIG_NUMA vs. CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA seems to cause this build error:

  CC  arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_phys
addr_to_nid' was here
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 
'memory_add_physaddr_to_
nid' was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/mm] Error 2

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: memory hotplug function redefinition/confusion

2006-11-16 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:25:20 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:

 
 2.6.19-rc5-mm2:
 
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h uses CONFIG_NUMA to decide:
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
 extern int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
 #else
 static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
 {
   return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
 but mm/init.c uses CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA to decide:
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
 int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
 {
   return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid);
 #endif
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
 int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
 {
   return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
 (sic: duplicate function above)
 
 The CONFIG_NUMA vs. CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA seems to cause this build error:
 
   CC  arch/x86_64/mm/init.o
 arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h:71: error: previous definition of 
 'memory_add_phys
 addr_to_nid' was here
 arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:509: error: redefinition of 'memory_add_physaddr_to_nid'
 arch/x86_64/mm/init.c:501: error: previous definition of 
 'memory_add_physaddr_to_
 nid' was here
 make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/mm/init.o] Error 1
 make: *** [arch/x86_64/mm] Error 2


Actually no flavor of NUMA is set:
http://oss.oracle.com/~rdunlap/configs/config-numa-err

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/