Re: [linux-lvm] Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
Dne 02. 04. 22 v 1:19 Demi Marie Obenour napsal(a): Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe? In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these, but only for operations performed by qubesd. systemd-udevd will still be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices these commands create or destroy. systemd-udevd will still be in charge of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use neither of these. This env variable is not meant to be use on system with running udev. So it's never safe - and it's only purpose is to be able to make some progress in some critical system condition. Regards Zdenek ___ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
[linux-lvm] Safety of DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync
Under what circumstances are DM_DISABLE_UDEV=1 and --noudevsync safe? In Qubes OS, for example, I am considering using one or both of these, but only for operations performed by qubesd. systemd-udevd will still be running, but it will be told to create no symlinks for the devices these commands create or destroy. systemd-udevd will still be in charge of other devices, however, and other lvm2 commands may run that use neither of these. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
