Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Arnd, > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > reason or another. > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > Thanks a lot! > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > Is that intentional? Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit architectures, I can add that as well. Arnd
Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038
Hi Arnd,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number
> of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one
> reason or another.
>
> This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking
> compatibility, doing a number of steps:
Thanks a lot!
> - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all
> architectures but that we definitely want there.
It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k.
Is that intentional?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
