Re: [PATCH] e4000: implement controls via v4l2 control framework

2014-02-05 Thread Antti Palosaari

Moi Hans

On 05.02.2014 09:28, Hans Verkuil wrote:

Hi Antti,

Hmm, it's a bit ugly this code. I have some suggestions below...


Yeah, there is some redundancy, I though also the same. But 
functionality is now correct what I see.


It is mostly that DVB gate-control logic which I personally dislike. 
There is quite big changes on my TODO list in order to improve overall 
situation. I already converted that driver to I2C model, it was the 
first step. Next thing is to implement I2C adapter properly = get rid 
of those gate-control callbacks. I did it already [1], but there is 
still some things to study (gate closing, regmap). After driver is 100% 
I2C model (I2C client + no I2C gate hacks) I could switch to regmap, 
which gives some nice stuff like register shadowing and I2C message 
splitting?. So there is a long road to learn and improve things towards 
to current kernel practices, due to payload from history...


After that I likely try to separate tuner functionality out from DVB / 
V4L APIs, still keeping those in same driver, but wrapping functionality.


So lets see if I get some inspiration to rebase that anymore at that 
point :]



[1] 
http://git.linuxtv.org/anttip/media_tree.git/shortlog/refs/heads/mn88472_dvbc


regards
Antti




On 02/05/2014 01:05 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:

Implement gain and bandwidth controls using v4l2 control framework.
Pointer to control handler is provided by exported symbol.

Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com
Cc: Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl
Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi
---
  drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c  | 210 +-
  drivers/media/tuners/e4000.h  |  14 +++
  drivers/media/tuners/e4000_priv.h |  12 +++
  3 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
index 9187190..77318e9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
+++ b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
@@ -448,6 +448,178 @@ err:
return ret;
  }

+static int e4000_set_lna_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)


I would change this to:

  e4000_set_lna_if_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe, bool lna_auto, bool if_auto, 
bool set_lna)


+{
+   struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
+   int ret;
+   u8 u8tmp;


General comment: always add a newline after variable declarations.


+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: lna auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
+   __func__, priv-lna_gain_auto-cur.val,
+   priv-lna_gain_auto-val, priv-lna_gain-cur.val,
+   priv-lna_gain-val);
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
+
+   if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val  priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val)
+   u8tmp = 0x17;
+   else if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val)
+   u8tmp = 0x19;
+   else if (priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val)
+   u8tmp = 0x16;
+   else
+   u8tmp = 0x10;
+
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x1a, u8tmp);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+
+   if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val == false) {
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x14, priv-lna_gain-val);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+   }


Set lna gain if set_lna is true and lna_auto is false, set if gain if
set_lna is false and if_gain is false.


+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   return 0;


I would remove the 4 lines above, and instead just...


+err:
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+


...add this:

if (ret)


+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: failed=%d\n, __func__, ret);
+   return ret;
+}
+
+static int e4000_set_mixer_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
+{
+   struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
+   int ret;
+   u8 u8tmp;
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: mixer auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
+   __func__, priv-mixer_gain_auto-cur.val,
+   priv-mixer_gain_auto-val, priv-mixer_gain-cur.val,
+   priv-mixer_gain-val);
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
+
+   if (priv-mixer_gain_auto-val)
+   u8tmp = 0x15;
+   else
+   u8tmp = 0x14;
+
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x20, u8tmp);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+
+   if (priv-mixer_gain_auto-val == false) {
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x15, priv-mixer_gain-val);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+   }
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   return 0;
+err:
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: failed=%d\n, __func__, ret);
+   return ret;
+}
+
+static int e4000_set_if_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
+{
+   struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
+   int 

[PATCH] e4000: implement controls via v4l2 control framework

2014-02-04 Thread Antti Palosaari
Implement gain and bandwidth controls using v4l2 control framework.
Pointer to control handler is provided by exported symbol.

Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com
Cc: Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl
Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi
---
 drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c  | 210 +-
 drivers/media/tuners/e4000.h  |  14 +++
 drivers/media/tuners/e4000_priv.h |  12 +++
 3 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
index 9187190..77318e9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
+++ b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
@@ -448,6 +448,178 @@ err:
return ret;
 }
 
+static int e4000_set_lna_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
+{
+   struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
+   int ret;
+   u8 u8tmp;
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: lna auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
+   __func__, priv-lna_gain_auto-cur.val,
+   priv-lna_gain_auto-val, priv-lna_gain-cur.val,
+   priv-lna_gain-val);
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
+
+   if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val  priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val)
+   u8tmp = 0x17;
+   else if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val)
+   u8tmp = 0x19;
+   else if (priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val)
+   u8tmp = 0x16;
+   else
+   u8tmp = 0x10;
+
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x1a, u8tmp);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+
+   if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val == false) {
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x14, priv-lna_gain-val);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+   }
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   return 0;
+err:
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: failed=%d\n, __func__, ret);
+   return ret;
+}
+
+static int e4000_set_mixer_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
+{
+   struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
+   int ret;
+   u8 u8tmp;
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: mixer auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
+   __func__, priv-mixer_gain_auto-cur.val,
+   priv-mixer_gain_auto-val, priv-mixer_gain-cur.val,
+   priv-mixer_gain-val);
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
+
+   if (priv-mixer_gain_auto-val)
+   u8tmp = 0x15;
+   else
+   u8tmp = 0x14;
+
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x20, u8tmp);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+
+   if (priv-mixer_gain_auto-val == false) {
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x15, priv-mixer_gain-val);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+   }
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   return 0;
+err:
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: failed=%d\n, __func__, ret);
+   return ret;
+}
+
+static int e4000_set_if_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
+{
+   struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
+   int ret;
+   u8 buf[2];
+   u8 u8tmp;
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: if auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
+   __func__, priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val,
+   priv-if_gain_auto-val, priv-if_gain-cur.val,
+   priv-if_gain-val);
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
+
+   if (priv-if_gain_auto-val  priv-lna_gain_auto-cur.val)
+   u8tmp = 0x17;
+   else if (priv-lna_gain_auto-cur.val)
+   u8tmp = 0x19;
+   else if (priv-if_gain_auto-val)
+   u8tmp = 0x16;
+   else
+   u8tmp = 0x10;
+
+   ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x1a, u8tmp);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+
+   if (priv-if_gain_auto-val == false) {
+   buf[0] = e4000_if_gain_lut[priv-if_gain-val].reg16_val;
+   buf[1] = e4000_if_gain_lut[priv-if_gain-val].reg17_val;
+   ret = e4000_wr_regs(priv, 0x16, buf, 2);
+   if (ret)
+   goto err;
+   }
+
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   return 0;
+err:
+   if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
+   fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
+
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: failed=%d\n, __func__, ret);
+   return ret;
+}
+
+static int e4000_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+   struct e4000_priv *priv =
+   container_of(ctrl-handler, struct e4000_priv, hdl);
+   struct dvb_frontend *fe = priv-fe;
+   struct dtv_frontend_properties *c = fe-dtv_property_cache;
+   int ret;
+   dev_dbg(priv-client-dev,
+   %s: id=%d name=%s val=%d min=%d max=%d 

Re: [PATCH] e4000: implement controls via v4l2 control framework

2014-02-04 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hi Antti,

Hmm, it's a bit ugly this code. I have some suggestions below...

On 02/05/2014 01:05 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
 Implement gain and bandwidth controls using v4l2 control framework.
 Pointer to control handler is provided by exported symbol.
 
 Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab m.che...@samsung.com
 Cc: Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl
 Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi
 ---
  drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c  | 210 
 +-
  drivers/media/tuners/e4000.h  |  14 +++
  drivers/media/tuners/e4000_priv.h |  12 +++
  3 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
 index 9187190..77318e9 100644
 --- a/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
 +++ b/drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c
 @@ -448,6 +448,178 @@ err:
   return ret;
  }
  
 +static int e4000_set_lna_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)

I would change this to:

 e4000_set_lna_if_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe, bool lna_auto, bool if_auto, 
bool set_lna)

 +{
 + struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
 + int ret;
 + u8 u8tmp;

General comment: always add a newline after variable declarations.

 + dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: lna auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
 + __func__, priv-lna_gain_auto-cur.val,
 + priv-lna_gain_auto-val, priv-lna_gain-cur.val,
 + priv-lna_gain-val);
 +
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
 +
 + if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val  priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val)
 + u8tmp = 0x17;
 + else if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val)
 + u8tmp = 0x19;
 + else if (priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val)
 + u8tmp = 0x16;
 + else
 + u8tmp = 0x10;
 +
 + ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x1a, u8tmp);
 + if (ret)
 + goto err;
 +
 + if (priv-lna_gain_auto-val == false) {
 + ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x14, priv-lna_gain-val);
 + if (ret)
 + goto err;
 + }

Set lna gain if set_lna is true and lna_auto is false, set if gain if
set_lna is false and if_gain is false.

 +
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
 +
 + return 0;

I would remove the 4 lines above, and instead just...

 +err:
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
 +

...add this:

if (ret)

 + dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: failed=%d\n, __func__, ret);
 + return ret;
 +}
 +
 +static int e4000_set_mixer_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
 +{
 + struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
 + int ret;
 + u8 u8tmp;
 + dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: mixer auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
 + __func__, priv-mixer_gain_auto-cur.val,
 + priv-mixer_gain_auto-val, priv-mixer_gain-cur.val,
 + priv-mixer_gain-val);
 +
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
 +
 + if (priv-mixer_gain_auto-val)
 + u8tmp = 0x15;
 + else
 + u8tmp = 0x14;
 +
 + ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x20, u8tmp);
 + if (ret)
 + goto err;
 +
 + if (priv-mixer_gain_auto-val == false) {
 + ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x15, priv-mixer_gain-val);
 + if (ret)
 + goto err;
 + }
 +
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
 +
 + return 0;
 +err:
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
 +
 + dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: failed=%d\n, __func__, ret);
 + return ret;
 +}
 +
 +static int e4000_set_if_gain(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
 +{
 + struct e4000_priv *priv = fe-tuner_priv;
 + int ret;
 + u8 buf[2];
 + u8 u8tmp;
 + dev_dbg(priv-client-dev, %s: if auto=%d-%d val=%d-%d\n,
 + __func__, priv-if_gain_auto-cur.val,
 + priv-if_gain_auto-val, priv-if_gain-cur.val,
 + priv-if_gain-val);
 +
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 1);
 +
 + if (priv-if_gain_auto-val  priv-lna_gain_auto-cur.val)
 + u8tmp = 0x17;
 + else if (priv-lna_gain_auto-cur.val)
 + u8tmp = 0x19;
 + else if (priv-if_gain_auto-val)
 + u8tmp = 0x16;
 + else
 + u8tmp = 0x10;
 +
 + ret = e4000_wr_reg(priv, 0x1a, u8tmp);
 + if (ret)
 + goto err;
 +
 + if (priv-if_gain_auto-val == false) {
 + buf[0] = e4000_if_gain_lut[priv-if_gain-val].reg16_val;
 + buf[1] = e4000_if_gain_lut[priv-if_gain-val].reg17_val;
 + ret = e4000_wr_regs(priv, 0x16, buf, 2);
 + if (ret)
 + goto err;
 + }
 +
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
 +
 + return 0;
 +err:
 + if (fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl)
 + fe-ops.i2c_gate_ctrl(fe, 0);
 +
 +