Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-31 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:03:25 -0200
Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com escreveu:

 During the clock conversion for mx27 the per4_gate clock was missed to get
 registered as a dependency of mx2-camera driver.
 
 In the old mx27 clock driver we used to have:
 
 DEFINE_CLOCK1(csi_clk, 0, NULL, 0, parent, csi_clk1, per4_clk);
 
 ,so does the same in the new clock driver
 
 Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
 Acked-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de

As it seems that those patches depend on some patches at the arm tree,
the better is to merge them via -arm tree.

So,

Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com

 ---
 Changes since v3:
 - Use imx27-camera.0 instead of mx2-camera.0, due to recent changes in the
 imx27 clock (commit 27b76486a3: media: mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using 
 platform_device_id)
 
  arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c |1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
 
 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
 index 585ab25..2880bd9 100644
 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
 +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
 @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ int __init mx27_clocks_init(unsigned long fref)
   clk_register_clkdev(clk[lcdc_ipg_gate], ipg, imx21-fb.0);
   clk_register_clkdev(clk[lcdc_ahb_gate], ahb, imx21-fb.0);
   clk_register_clkdev(clk[csi_ahb_gate], ahb, imx27-camera.0);
 + clk_register_clkdev(clk[per4_gate], per, imx27-camera.0);
   clk_register_clkdev(clk[usb_div], per, fsl-usb2-udc);
   clk_register_clkdev(clk[usb_ipg_gate], ipg, fsl-usb2-udc);
   clk_register_clkdev(clk[usb_ahb_gate], ahb, fsl-usb2-udc);




Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-31 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Mauro,

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:56:32AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
 Em Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:03:25 -0200
 Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com escreveu:
 
  During the clock conversion for mx27 the per4_gate clock was missed to get
  registered as a dependency of mx2-camera driver.
  
  In the old mx27 clock driver we used to have:
  
  DEFINE_CLOCK1(csi_clk, 0, NULL, 0, parent, csi_clk1, per4_clk);
  
  ,so does the same in the new clock driver
  
  Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
  Acked-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
 
 As it seems that those patches depend on some patches at the arm tree,
 the better is to merge them via -arm tree.

Quoting yourself:

 Forgot to comment: as patch 2 relies on this change, the better, IMHO, is
 to send both via the same tree. If you decide to do so, please get arm
 maintainer's ack, instead, and we can merge both via my tree.

That's why Fabio resent these patches with my Ack. You are free to take
these.

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0|
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686   | Fax:   +49-5121-206917- |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-31 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Sascha,

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:

 Quoting yourself:

 Forgot to comment: as patch 2 relies on this change, the better, IMHO, is
 to send both via the same tree. If you decide to do so, please get arm
 maintainer's ack, instead, and we can merge both via my tree.

 That's why Fabio resent these patches with my Ack. You are free to take
 these.

I have just realized that this patch (1/2) will not apply against
media tree because it does not have commit 27b76486a3 (media:
mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id), which
changes from mx2_camera.0 to imx27-camera.0.

So it seems to be better to merge this via arm tree to avoid such conflict.

Regards,

Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-31 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote:

 Hi Sascha,
 
 On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de wrote:
 
  Quoting yourself:
 
  Forgot to comment: as patch 2 relies on this change, the better, IMHO, is
  to send both via the same tree. If you decide to do so, please get arm
  maintainer's ack, instead, and we can merge both via my tree.
 
  That's why Fabio resent these patches with my Ack. You are free to take
  these.
 
 I have just realized that this patch (1/2) will not apply against
 media tree because it does not have commit 27b76486a3 (media:
 mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id), which
 changes from mx2_camera.0 to imx27-camera.0.

This is exactly the reason why I wasn't able to merge it. The problem was, 
that this media: mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using 
platform_device_id patch non-trivially touched both arch/arm/ and 
drivers/media/ directories. And being patch 27/34 I didn't feel like 
asking the author to redo it again:-) This confirms, that it's better to 
avoid such overlapping patches whenever possible.

 So it seems to be better to merge this via arm tree to avoid such conflict.

Thanks
Guennadi

 Regards,
 
 Fabio Estevam

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-31 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:53:47 +0100 (CET)
Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de escreveu:

 On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote:
 
  Hi Sascha,
  
  On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de 
  wrote:
  
   Quoting yourself:
  
   Forgot to comment: as patch 2 relies on this change, the better, IMHO, is
   to send both via the same tree. If you decide to do so, please get arm
   maintainer's ack, instead, and we can merge both via my tree.
  
   That's why Fabio resent these patches with my Ack. You are free to take
   these.
  
  I have just realized that this patch (1/2) will not apply against
  media tree because it does not have commit 27b76486a3 (media:
  mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id), which
  changes from mx2_camera.0 to imx27-camera.0.
 
 This is exactly the reason why I wasn't able to merge it. The problem was, 
 that this media: mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using 
 platform_device_id patch non-trivially touched both arch/arm/ and 
 drivers/media/ directories. And being patch 27/34 I didn't feel like 
 asking the author to redo it again:-) This confirms, that it's better to 
 avoid such overlapping patches whenever possible.
 
  So it seems to be better to merge this via arm tree to avoid such conflict.

I agree with Fabio and Guennadi. There are so many changes happening at arm
that merging those two patches there will likely be easier for everybody. 

Otherwise, I'll need to pull from some arm tree that never rebase, with
the needed patches, and coordinate with you during the merge window,
to be sure that patches will arrive there at the right order, from the
right tree.

Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-31 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:53:03PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
 Em Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:53:47 +0100 (CET)
 Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de escreveu:
 
  On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote:
  
   Hi Sascha,
   
   On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de 
   wrote:
   
Quoting yourself:
   
Forgot to comment: as patch 2 relies on this change, the better, IMHO, 
is
to send both via the same tree. If you decide to do so, please get arm
maintainer's ack, instead, and we can merge both via my tree.
   
That's why Fabio resent these patches with my Ack. You are free to take
these.
   
   I have just realized that this patch (1/2) will not apply against
   media tree because it does not have commit 27b76486a3 (media:
   mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using platform_device_id), which
   changes from mx2_camera.0 to imx27-camera.0.
  
  This is exactly the reason why I wasn't able to merge it. The problem was, 
  that this media: mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using 
  platform_device_id patch non-trivially touched both arch/arm/ and 
  drivers/media/ directories. And being patch 27/34 I didn't feel like 
  asking the author to redo it again:-) This confirms, that it's better to 
  avoid such overlapping patches whenever possible.
  
   So it seems to be better to merge this via arm tree to avoid such 
   conflict.
 
 I agree with Fabio and Guennadi. There are so many changes happening at arm
 that merging those two patches there will likely be easier for everybody.

Ok, then I'll take them. I wasn't aware in arm-soc are sitting patches
for this driver already.

 
 Otherwise, I'll need to pull from some arm tree that never rebase, with
 the needed patches, and coordinate with you during the merge window,
 to be sure that patches will arrive there at the right order, from the
 right tree.

Hopefully these kind of cross dependencies become fewer over time. SoC
code is getting smaller and gets better abstracted from the drivers, so
chances are good.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0|
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686   | Fax:   +49-5121-206917- |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-31 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:02:49 +0100
Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de escreveu:

 On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:53:03PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
  Em Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:53:47 +0100 (CET)
  Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de escreveu:
  
   On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Fabio Estevam wrote:

  I agree with Fabio and Guennadi. There are so many changes happening at arm
  that merging those two patches there will likely be easier for everybody.
 
 Ok, then I'll take them. I wasn't aware in arm-soc are sitting patches
 for this driver already.

Thank you!

  
  Otherwise, I'll need to pull from some arm tree that never rebase, with
  the needed patches, and coordinate with you during the merge window,
  to be sure that patches will arrive there at the right order, from the
  right tree.
 
 Hopefully these kind of cross dependencies become fewer over time. SoC
 code is getting smaller and gets better abstracted from the drivers, so
 chances are good.

Yes, I'm expecting so.

Regards,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: clk-imx27: Add missing clock for mx2-camera

2012-10-30 Thread Fabio Estevam
During the clock conversion for mx27 the per4_gate clock was missed to get
registered as a dependency of mx2-camera driver.

In the old mx27 clock driver we used to have:

DEFINE_CLOCK1(csi_clk, 0, NULL, 0, parent, csi_clk1, per4_clk);

,so does the same in the new clock driver

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
Acked-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
---
Changes since v3:
- Use imx27-camera.0 instead of mx2-camera.0, due to recent changes in the
imx27 clock (commit 27b76486a3: media: mx2_camera: remove cpu_is_xxx by using 
platform_device_id)

 arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c |1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
index 585ab25..2880bd9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ int __init mx27_clocks_init(unsigned long fref)
clk_register_clkdev(clk[lcdc_ipg_gate], ipg, imx21-fb.0);
clk_register_clkdev(clk[lcdc_ahb_gate], ahb, imx21-fb.0);
clk_register_clkdev(clk[csi_ahb_gate], ahb, imx27-camera.0);
+   clk_register_clkdev(clk[per4_gate], per, imx27-camera.0);
clk_register_clkdev(clk[usb_div], per, fsl-usb2-udc);
clk_register_clkdev(clk[usb_ipg_gate], ipg, fsl-usb2-udc);
clk_register_clkdev(clk[usb_ahb_gate], ahb, fsl-usb2-udc);
-- 
1.7.9.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-media in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html