Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > It's a sil3124 PCI-X SATA II card that is extemely fussy. I can only get > to work if I have every other PCI card in my computer in a few specific > configurations. If I add the bt848 card, it won't work. If I *remove* my > sound card it won't work. If I put the SATA card in another slot it won't > work. If I move my cx88 HD-5500 card to another slot it won't work. If I > install the cx88 HD-3000 card in place of the HD-5500 it won't work. > > Only problem with the cheap VIA PCI SATA I card I'm using is that it has > much lower performance than the sil card when it works. I just need a new > computer, keeping this dual athlon system from 2001 working is getting too > hard. Faster Athlon-MP CPUs are insanely expensive on ebay. No PCI-E > slots for modern SATA or graphics cards. Doesn't work with AGP 8x. Won't > boot unless I go through a magic sequence of turning it on and off in quick > sequence. And I'm sick of messing with the closed source nvidia driver > that keeps getting worse and worse with each revision. I have a friend who was in the same boat not too long ago but he wound up saying forget it and built a new system. Well, kept the old dvd burner, psu, case, mouse, keyboard, monitor. Basically just bought a new mainboard + cpu + ram. I can say he's very happy now and spent < $150. Maybe it's time to retire your old box to a file or email server. ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
Hi, Am Samstag, den 14.02.2009, 18:43 -0800 schrieb Trent Piepho: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, VDR User wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Trent Piepho wrote: > > >> Didn't you say in your original post that you _haven't_ tested the > > >> code because of a conflict with your sata driver? It's not safe to > > > > > > I was able to test it later by getting a different sata card. > > > > Ahh, gotcha. Just curious, which card/drivers were you using that > > conflicted with bttv? > > It's a sil3124 PCI-X SATA II card that is extemely fussy. I can only get > to work if I have every other PCI card in my computer in a few specific > configurations. If I add the bt848 card, it won't work. If I *remove* my > sound card it won't work. If I put the SATA card in another slot it won't > work. If I move my cx88 HD-5500 card to another slot it won't work. If I > install the cx88 HD-3000 card in place of the HD-5500 it won't work. > > Only problem with the cheap VIA PCI SATA I card I'm using is that it has > much lower performance than the sil card when it works. I just need a new > computer, keeping this dual athlon system from 2001 working is getting too > hard. Faster Athlon-MP CPUs are insanely expensive on ebay. No PCI-E > slots for modern SATA or graphics cards. Doesn't work with AGP 8x. Won't > boot unless I go through a magic sequence of turning it on and off in quick > sequence. And I'm sick of messing with the closed source nvidia driver > that keeps getting worse and worse with each revision. if I would only know where to get such a more exotic bttv card others still seem to have, but have no time to test. ;) This will be the same on saa7134 and cx88xx soon. Cheers, Hermann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, VDR User wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Trent Piepho wrote: > >> Didn't you say in your original post that you _haven't_ tested the > >> code because of a conflict with your sata driver? It's not safe to > > > > I was able to test it later by getting a different sata card. > > Ahh, gotcha. Just curious, which card/drivers were you using that > conflicted with bttv? It's a sil3124 PCI-X SATA II card that is extemely fussy. I can only get to work if I have every other PCI card in my computer in a few specific configurations. If I add the bt848 card, it won't work. If I *remove* my sound card it won't work. If I put the SATA card in another slot it won't work. If I move my cx88 HD-5500 card to another slot it won't work. If I install the cx88 HD-3000 card in place of the HD-5500 it won't work. Only problem with the cheap VIA PCI SATA I card I'm using is that it has much lower performance than the sil card when it works. I just need a new computer, keeping this dual athlon system from 2001 working is getting too hard. Faster Athlon-MP CPUs are insanely expensive on ebay. No PCI-E slots for modern SATA or graphics cards. Doesn't work with AGP 8x. Won't boot unless I go through a magic sequence of turning it on and off in quick sequence. And I'm sick of messing with the closed source nvidia driver that keeps getting worse and worse with each revision. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Trent Piepho wrote: >> Didn't you say in your original post that you _haven't_ tested the >> code because of a conflict with your sata driver? It's not safe to > > I was able to test it later by getting a different sata card. Ahh, gotcha. Just curious, which card/drivers were you using that conflicted with bttv? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, VDR User wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > > I tested it on my bttv card. I assume Mauro was able to test it too. Have > > you found a problem? > > Didn't you say in your original post that you _haven't_ tested the > code because of a conflict with your sata driver? It's not safe to I was able to test it later by getting a different sata card. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > I tested it on my bttv card. I assume Mauro was able to test it too. Have > you found a problem? Didn't you say in your original post that you _haven't_ tested the code because of a conflict with your sata driver? It's not safe to assume Mauro has tested the changes. There have been times in the past when he's changed code for cards he doesn't even have and committed then with absolutely no testing what-so-ever. I probably still have the emails. I haven't tested your patch yet. Am currently testing other cards and had to remove my vp1020. Will let you know what results I get when I have the chance to test it however. Either way, thanks for working on the driver, hopefully the code is safe or would just need little fixes. :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, user.vdr wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > Very nice work! You've reduced the driver data/bss size a lot: > > > > Before: > > textdata bss dec hex filename > > 88854 64312 123668 276834 43962 bttv.ko > > > > After: > > textdata bss dec hex filename > > 88780 504881044 140312 22418 bttv.ko > > > > I've just committed it. > > Would be nice if someone at least tested a major change before it's committed. I tested it on my bttv card. I assume Mauro was able to test it too. Have you found a problem? It would be nice to test the "weird" cards with digital inputs and external muxes, but I don't have one. There are probably very few, if any, people who actually still use these cards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't work >> with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the >> harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv >> driver to less than half its current size. >> >> A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if >> any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while now. >> >> Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv >> > Very nice work! You've reduced the driver data/bss size a lot: > > Before: > textdata bss dec hex filename > 88854 64312 123668 276834 43962 bttv.ko > > After: > textdata bss dec hex filename > 88780 504881044 140312 22418 bttv.ko > > I've just committed it. Would be nice if someone at least tested a major change before it's committed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:19:24 -0800 (PST) Trent Piepho wrote: > Mauro, > > I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't work > with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the > harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv > driver to less than half its current size. > > A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if > any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while now. > > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv > Very nice work! You've reduced the driver data/bss size a lot: Before: textdata bss dec hex filename 88854 64312 123668 276834 43962 bttv.ko After: textdata bss dec hex filename 88780 504881044 140312 22418 bttv.ko I've just committed it. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > >> > I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't > >> > work > >> > with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the > >> > harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv > >> > driver to less than half its current size. > >> > > >> > A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if > >> > any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while > >> > now. > >> > > >> > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv > >> > > >> > bttv-cards.c | 1323 > >> > ++ > >> > bttv-driver.c | 90 +-- > >> > bttv-i2c.c|6 > >> > bttv-if.c | 18 > >> > bttv-risc.c |4 > >> > bttv-vbi.c|2 > >> > bttv.h| 84 ++- > >> > bttvp.h | 19 > >> > 8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 906 deletions(-) > >> > >> Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you said in this email, but are you > >> submitting a PULL request for 1500 lines of code that have had no > >> testing? > > > > Bugs?! In my code? I think not! > > > > If you look at the patches you'll see it's not nearly as large as it might > > seem. > When I make a five line code change for a given chipset, I won't > submit it unless it's tested against at least three cards. In this > case, it's 1500 lines, and you have tested it on zero cards. You make > one typo or screw up one pointer and we'll have potentially hundreds > of people reporting kernel panics. A typo would almost certainly result in some sort of compile failure or warning. Most of the repetitive changes where mistakes could creep in and not cause an apparent problem were done via perl scripts. Code pulled into v4l-dvb doesn't immediately go to the kernel anyway. It would sit there for a while and get some testing. Anyway, by replacing my PCI-X SATA-II card with a PCI SATA-I card I was able to get my bttv card to work. Or rather I was able to get my HD to work with the bttv card installed. Everything worked fine for my card. The testing I'd like is any of the card with external muxes or digital inputs. Especially the cards that I don't think were working before. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab > Devin, > > I have one bttv hardware installed here available for testing. This one has 4 > bttv chips and uses 2 different board entries. I intend to test the changeset > before applying. Anyway, it is good if more people could test it, especially > with the exotic hardware. > > Unfortunately, my other bttv hardwares are on another city, so I can't test on > them. > > Cheers, > Mauro Great. Thanks, Mauro. Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller http://www.devinheitmueller.com AIM: devinheitmueller -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:27:20 -0500 Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Trent Piepho wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > >> > I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't > >> > work > >> > with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the > >> > harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv > >> > driver to less than half its current size. > >> > > >> > A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if > >> > any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while > >> > now. > >> > > >> > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv > >> > > >> > bttv-cards.c | 1323 > >> > ++ > >> > bttv-driver.c | 90 +-- > >> > bttv-i2c.c|6 > >> > bttv-if.c | 18 > >> > bttv-risc.c |4 > >> > bttv-vbi.c|2 > >> > bttv.h| 84 ++- > >> > bttvp.h | 19 > >> > 8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 906 deletions(-) > >> > >> Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you said in this email, but are you > >> submitting a PULL request for 1500 lines of code that have had no > >> testing? > > > > Bugs?! In my code? I think not! > > > > If you look at the patches you'll see it's not nearly as large as it might > > seem. > > When I make a five line code change for a given chipset, I won't > submit it unless it's tested against at least three cards. In this > case, it's 1500 lines, and you have tested it on zero cards. You make > one typo or screw up one pointer and we'll have potentially hundreds > of people reporting kernel panics. > > I don't care how safe you think the change is. If it isn't tested it > under at least one card, then it cannot be that important a change as > to incur the risk of regressions. This isn't a one-line change to a > comment. > > I'm just one developer and my opinion doesn't count for much, but > checking in a large body of code blindly is a colossally stupid idea. Devin, I have one bttv hardware installed here available for testing. This one has 4 bttv chips and uses 2 different board entries. I intend to test the changeset before applying. Anyway, it is good if more people could test it, especially with the exotic hardware. Unfortunately, my other bttv hardwares are on another city, so I can't test on them. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: >> > I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't work >> > with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the >> > harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv >> > driver to less than half its current size. >> > >> > A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if >> > any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while >> > now. >> > >> > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv >> > >> > bttv-cards.c | 1323 >> > ++ >> > bttv-driver.c | 90 +-- >> > bttv-i2c.c|6 >> > bttv-if.c | 18 >> > bttv-risc.c |4 >> > bttv-vbi.c|2 >> > bttv.h| 84 ++- >> > bttvp.h | 19 >> > 8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 906 deletions(-) >> >> Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you said in this email, but are you >> submitting a PULL request for 1500 lines of code that have had no >> testing? > > Bugs?! In my code? I think not! > > If you look at the patches you'll see it's not nearly as large as it might > seem. When I make a five line code change for a given chipset, I won't submit it unless it's tested against at least three cards. In this case, it's 1500 lines, and you have tested it on zero cards. You make one typo or screw up one pointer and we'll have potentially hundreds of people reporting kernel panics. I don't care how safe you think the change is. If it isn't tested it under at least one card, then it cannot be that important a change as to incur the risk of regressions. This isn't a one-line change to a comment. I'm just one developer and my opinion doesn't count for much, but checking in a large body of code blindly is a colossally stupid idea. Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller http://www.devinheitmueller.com AIM: devinheitmueller -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
Trent Piepho wrote: On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't work with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv driver to less than half its current size. A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while now. Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv bttv-cards.c | 1323 ++ bttv-driver.c | 90 +-- bttv-i2c.c|6 bttv-if.c | 18 bttv-risc.c |4 bttv-vbi.c|2 bttv.h| 84 ++- bttvp.h | 19 8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 906 deletions(-) Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you said in this email, but are you submitting a PULL request for 1500 lines of code that have had no testing? Bugs?! In my code? I think not! If you look at the patches you'll see it's not nearly as large as it might seem. The muxsel chunk in my IVC120G looks ok. I've not tried it on the hardware, but it is only a minor change and there would be no net effect after the modification in my case (other than removing an unnecessary mux switch and making the code smaller). -A. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > > I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't work > > with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the > > harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv > > driver to less than half its current size. > > > > A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if > > any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while > > now. > > > > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv > > > > bttv-cards.c | 1323 > > ++ > > bttv-driver.c | 90 +-- > > bttv-i2c.c|6 > > bttv-if.c | 18 > > bttv-risc.c |4 > > bttv-vbi.c|2 > > bttv.h| 84 ++- > > bttvp.h | 19 > > 8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 906 deletions(-) > > Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you said in this email, but are you > submitting a PULL request for 1500 lines of code that have had no > testing? Bugs?! In my code? I think not! If you look at the patches you'll see it's not nearly as large as it might seem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PULL] bttv driver improvements
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Trent Piepho wrote: > Mauro, > > I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't work > with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the > harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv > driver to less than half its current size. > > A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if > any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while now. > > Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv > > for the following 11 changesets: > > 01/11: bttv: norm value should be unsigned > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=50f1e731724a > > 02/11: bttv: Fix TDA9880 norm setting code > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=57e9059c7351 > > 03/11: bttv: make tuner card info more consistent > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=e00ad34122b7 > > 04/11: bttv: store card database more efficiently > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=01eb02aea459 > > 05/11: bttv: rework the way digital inputs are indicated > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=0478bab75dc0 > > 06/11: bttv: clean up mux code for IVC-120G > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=c71a94680ca0 > > 07/11: bttv: fix external mux for PHYTEC VD-009 > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=67a52d2c6376 > > 08/11: bttv: fix external mux for RemoteVision MX > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=d2f23dd03aef > > 09/11: bttv: clean up mux code for IDS Eagle > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=944eeb814dd8 > > 10/11: bttv: shrink muxsel data in card database > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=d62cf6dd3da6 > > 11/11: bttv: dynamically allocate device data > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=b99081ff66cf > > > bttv-cards.c | 1323 > ++ > bttv-driver.c | 90 +-- > bttv-i2c.c|6 > bttv-if.c | 18 > bttv-risc.c |4 > bttv-vbi.c|2 > bttv.h| 84 ++- > bttvp.h | 19 > 8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 906 deletions(-) > > Thanks, > Trent > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Hello Trent, Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you said in this email, but are you submitting a PULL request for 1500 lines of code that have had no testing? Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller http://www.devinheitmueller.com AIM: devinheitmueller -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PULL] bttv driver improvements
Mauro, I haven't been able to test this code. It seems my bt848 card doesn't work with my SATA controller and I sort of need the latter to access the harddrive. But I think everything should work. It cuts the the bttv driver to less than half its current size. A number of the changes are for specialized cards that likely have few if any users left. I'm pretty sure some have been broken for quite a while now. Please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv for the following 11 changesets: 01/11: bttv: norm value should be unsigned http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=50f1e731724a 02/11: bttv: Fix TDA9880 norm setting code http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=57e9059c7351 03/11: bttv: make tuner card info more consistent http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=e00ad34122b7 04/11: bttv: store card database more efficiently http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=01eb02aea459 05/11: bttv: rework the way digital inputs are indicated http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=0478bab75dc0 06/11: bttv: clean up mux code for IVC-120G http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=c71a94680ca0 07/11: bttv: fix external mux for PHYTEC VD-009 http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=67a52d2c6376 08/11: bttv: fix external mux for RemoteVision MX http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=d2f23dd03aef 09/11: bttv: clean up mux code for IDS Eagle http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=944eeb814dd8 10/11: bttv: shrink muxsel data in card database http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=d62cf6dd3da6 11/11: bttv: dynamically allocate device data http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/bttv?cmd=changeset;node=b99081ff66cf bttv-cards.c | 1323 ++ bttv-driver.c | 90 +-- bttv-i2c.c|6 bttv-if.c | 18 bttv-risc.c |4 bttv-vbi.c|2 bttv.h| 84 ++- bttvp.h | 19 8 files changed, 640 insertions(+), 906 deletions(-) Thanks, Trent -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
