Hi Manju, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 20:35:31, Hadli, Manjunath wrote: > add a condition to in the isr to check for interrupt ownership and
"to" is misplaced here? > channel number to make sure we do not service wrong interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.ha...@ti.com> I think it will be nice to expand on the "why" this patch is required a little bit. What is the usage case where you can get wrong interrupts? What exactly happens if you service wrong interrupts? Explaining these in the commit message will help the maintainers take a call on the criticality of this patch (whether it should be queued in the current -rc cycle or not). Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
