Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-27 Thread Logan Gunthorpe


On 27/04/17 05:20 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> It seems the most robust: test for iomem, and jump to a slow path
> copy, otherwise inline the kmap and memcpy
> 
> Every place doing memcpy from sgl will need that pattern to be
> correct.

Ok, sounds like a good place to start to me. I'll see what I can do for
a v3 of this set. Though, I probably won't send anything until after the
merge window.

>>> sg_miter will still fail when the sg contains __iomem, however I would
>>> expect that the sg_copy will work with iomem, by using the __iomem
>>> memcpy variant.
>>
>> Yes, that's true. Any sg_miters that ever see iomem will need to be
>> converted to support it. This isn't much different than the other
>> kmap(sg_page()) users I was converting that will also fail if they see
>> iomem. Though, I suspect an sg_miter user would be easier to convert to
>> iomem than a random kmap user.
> 
> How? sg_miter seems like the next nightmare down this path, what is
> sg_miter_next supposed to do when something hits an iomem sgl?

My proposal is roughly included in the draft I sent upthread. We add an
sg_miter flag indicating the iteratee supports iomem and if miter finds
iomem (with the support flag set) it sets ioaddr which is __iomem. The
iteratee then just needs to null check addr and ioaddr and perform the
appropriate action.

Logan



Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-27 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 05:03:45PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 27/04/17 04:11 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:53:37PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Well, that is in the current form, with more users it would make sense
> > to optimize for the single page case, eg by providing the existing
> > call, providing a faster single-page-only variant of the copy, perhaps
> > even one that is inlined.
> 
> Ok, does it make sense then to have an sg_copy_page_to_buffer (or some
> such... I'm having trouble thinking of a sane name that isn't too long).
> That just does k(un)map_atomic and memcpy? I could try that if it makes
> sense to people.

It seems the most robust: test for iomem, and jump to a slow path
copy, otherwise inline the kmap and memcpy

Every place doing memcpy from sgl will need that pattern to be
correct.

> > sg_miter will still fail when the sg contains __iomem, however I would
> > expect that the sg_copy will work with iomem, by using the __iomem
> > memcpy variant.
> 
> Yes, that's true. Any sg_miters that ever see iomem will need to be
> converted to support it. This isn't much different than the other
> kmap(sg_page()) users I was converting that will also fail if they see
> iomem. Though, I suspect an sg_miter user would be easier to convert to
> iomem than a random kmap user.

How? sg_miter seems like the next nightmare down this path, what is
sg_miter_next supposed to do when something hits an iomem sgl?

miter.addr is supposed to be a kernel pointer that must not be
__iomem..

Jason


Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-27 Thread Logan Gunthorpe


On 27/04/17 04:11 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:53:37PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Well, that is in the current form, with more users it would make sense
> to optimize for the single page case, eg by providing the existing
> call, providing a faster single-page-only variant of the copy, perhaps
> even one that is inlined.

Ok, does it make sense then to have an sg_copy_page_to_buffer (or some
such... I'm having trouble thinking of a sane name that isn't too long).
That just does k(un)map_atomic and memcpy? I could try that if it makes
sense to people.

>> Switching the for_each_sg to sg_miter is probably the nicer solution as
>> it takes care of the mapping and the offset/length accounting for you
>> and will have similar performance.
> 
> sg_miter will still fail when the sg contains __iomem, however I would
> expect that the sg_copy will work with iomem, by using the __iomem
> memcpy variant.

Yes, that's true. Any sg_miters that ever see iomem will need to be
converted to support it. This isn't much different than the other
kmap(sg_page()) users I was converting that will also fail if they see
iomem. Though, I suspect an sg_miter user would be easier to convert to
iomem than a random kmap user.

Logan


Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-27 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:53:37PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> On 27/04/17 02:53 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > blkfront is one of the drivers I looked at, and it appears to only be
> > memcpying with the bvec_data pointer, so I wonder why it does not use
> > sg_copy_X_buffer instead..
> 
> But you'd potentially end up calling sg_copy_to_buffer multiple times
> per page within the sg (given that gnttab_foreach_grant_in_range might
> call blkif_copy_from_grant/blkif_setup_rw_req_grant multiple times).
> Even calling sg_copy_to_buffer once per page seems rather inefficient as
> it uses sg_miter internally.

Well, that is in the current form, with more users it would make sense
to optimize for the single page case, eg by providing the existing
call, providing a faster single-page-only variant of the copy, perhaps
even one that is inlined.

> Switching the for_each_sg to sg_miter is probably the nicer solution as
> it takes care of the mapping and the offset/length accounting for you
> and will have similar performance.

sg_miter will still fail when the sg contains __iomem, however I would
expect that the sg_copy will work with iomem, by using the __iomem
memcpy variant.

So, sg_copy should always be preferred in this new world with mixed
__iomem since it is the only primitive that can transparently handle
it.

Jason


Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-27 Thread Logan Gunthorpe


On 27/04/17 02:53 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> blkfront is one of the drivers I looked at, and it appears to only be
> memcpying with the bvec_data pointer, so I wonder why it does not use
> sg_copy_X_buffer instead..

Yes, sort of...

But you'd potentially end up calling sg_copy_to_buffer multiple times
per page within the sg (given that gnttab_foreach_grant_in_range might
call blkif_copy_from_grant/blkif_setup_rw_req_grant multiple times).
Even calling sg_copy_to_buffer once per page seems rather inefficient as
it uses sg_miter internally.

Switching the for_each_sg to sg_miter is probably the nicer solution as
it takes care of the mapping and the offset/length accounting for you
and will have similar performance.

But, yes, if performance is not an issue, switching it to
sg_copy_to_buffer would be a less invasive change than sg_miter. Which
the same might be said about a lot of these cases.

Unfortunately, changing from kmap_atomic (which is a null operation in a
lot of cases) to sg_copy_X_buffer is a pretty big performance hit.

Logan


Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-27 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 02:19:24PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> 
> On 26/04/17 01:37 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:21:02PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >> Straightforward conversion to the new helper, except due to the lack
> >> of error path, we have to use SG_MAP_MUST_NOT_FAIL which may BUG_ON in
> >> certain cases in the future.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe 
> >> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky 
> >> Cc: Juergen Gross 
> >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
> >> Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" 
> >>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 20 +++-
> >>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> index 3945963..ed62175 100644
> >> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> >> @@ -816,8 +816,9 @@ static int blkif_queue_rw_req(struct request *req, 
> >> struct blkfront_ring_info *ri
> >>BUG_ON(sg->offset + sg->length > PAGE_SIZE);
> >>  
> >>if (setup.need_copy) {
> >> -  setup.bvec_off = sg->offset;
> >> -  setup.bvec_data = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg));
> >> +  setup.bvec_off = 0;
> >> +  setup.bvec_data = sg_map(sg, 0, SG_KMAP_ATOMIC |
> >> +   SG_MAP_MUST_NOT_FAIL);
> > 
> > I assume that sg_map already adds sg->offset to the address?
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > Also wondering whether we can get rid of bvec_off and just increment 
> > bvec_data,
> > adding Julien who IIRC added this code.
> 
> bvec_off is used to keep track of the offset within the current mapping
> so it's not a great idea given that you'd want to kunmap_atomic the
> original address and not something with an offset. It would be nice if
> this could be converted to use the sg_miter interface but that's a much
> more invasive change that would require someone who knows this code and
> can properly test it. I'd be very grateful if someone actually took that on.

blkfront is one of the drivers I looked at, and it appears to only be
memcpying with the bvec_data pointer, so I wonder why it does not use
sg_copy_X_buffer instead..

Jason


Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-27 Thread Logan Gunthorpe


On 26/04/17 01:37 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:21:02PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Straightforward conversion to the new helper, except due to the lack
>> of error path, we have to use SG_MAP_MUST_NOT_FAIL which may BUG_ON in
>> certain cases in the future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe 
>> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky 
>> Cc: Juergen Gross 
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
>> Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" 
>> ---
>>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 20 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> index 3945963..ed62175 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
>> @@ -816,8 +816,9 @@ static int blkif_queue_rw_req(struct request *req, 
>> struct blkfront_ring_info *ri
>>  BUG_ON(sg->offset + sg->length > PAGE_SIZE);
>>  
>>  if (setup.need_copy) {
>> -setup.bvec_off = sg->offset;
>> -setup.bvec_data = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg));
>> +setup.bvec_off = 0;
>> +setup.bvec_data = sg_map(sg, 0, SG_KMAP_ATOMIC |
>> + SG_MAP_MUST_NOT_FAIL);
> 
> I assume that sg_map already adds sg->offset to the address?

Correct.

> Also wondering whether we can get rid of bvec_off and just increment 
> bvec_data,
> adding Julien who IIRC added this code.

bvec_off is used to keep track of the offset within the current mapping
so it's not a great idea given that you'd want to kunmap_atomic the
original address and not something with an offset. It would be nice if
this could be converted to use the sg_miter interface but that's a much
more invasive change that would require someone who knows this code and
can properly test it. I'd be very grateful if someone actually took that on.

Logan



Re: [PATCH v2 15/21] xen-blkfront: Make use of the new sg_map helper function

2017-04-26 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:21:02PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Straightforward conversion to the new helper, except due to the lack
> of error path, we have to use SG_MAP_MUST_NOT_FAIL which may BUG_ON in
> certain cases in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe 
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky 
> Cc: Juergen Gross 
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
> Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" 
> ---
>  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 20 +++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> index 3945963..ed62175 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
> @@ -816,8 +816,9 @@ static int blkif_queue_rw_req(struct request *req, struct 
> blkfront_ring_info *ri
>   BUG_ON(sg->offset + sg->length > PAGE_SIZE);
>  
>   if (setup.need_copy) {
> - setup.bvec_off = sg->offset;
> - setup.bvec_data = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg));
> + setup.bvec_off = 0;
> + setup.bvec_data = sg_map(sg, 0, SG_KMAP_ATOMIC |
> +  SG_MAP_MUST_NOT_FAIL);

I assume that sg_map already adds sg->offset to the address?

Also wondering whether we can get rid of bvec_off and just increment bvec_data,
adding Julien who IIRC added this code.

>   }
>  
>   gnttab_foreach_grant_in_range(sg_page(sg),
> @@ -827,7 +828,7 @@ static int blkif_queue_rw_req(struct request *req, struct 
> blkfront_ring_info *ri
> );
>  
>   if (setup.need_copy)
> - kunmap_atomic(setup.bvec_data);
> + sg_unmap(sg, setup.bvec_data, 0, SG_KMAP_ATOMIC);
>   }
>   if (setup.segments)
>   kunmap_atomic(setup.segments);
> @@ -1053,7 +1054,7 @@ static int xen_translate_vdev(int vdevice, int *minor, 
> unsigned int *offset)
>   case XEN_SCSI_DISK5_MAJOR:
>   case XEN_SCSI_DISK6_MAJOR:
>   case XEN_SCSI_DISK7_MAJOR:
> - *offset = (*minor / PARTS_PER_DISK) + 
> + *offset = (*minor / PARTS_PER_DISK) +
>   ((major - XEN_SCSI_DISK1_MAJOR + 1) * 16) +
>   EMULATED_SD_DISK_NAME_OFFSET;
>   *minor = *minor +
> @@ -1068,7 +1069,7 @@ static int xen_translate_vdev(int vdevice, int *minor, 
> unsigned int *offset)
>   case XEN_SCSI_DISK13_MAJOR:
>   case XEN_SCSI_DISK14_MAJOR:
>   case XEN_SCSI_DISK15_MAJOR:
> - *offset = (*minor / PARTS_PER_DISK) + 
> + *offset = (*minor / PARTS_PER_DISK) +
>   ((major - XEN_SCSI_DISK8_MAJOR + 8) * 16) +
>   EMULATED_SD_DISK_NAME_OFFSET;
>   *minor = *minor +
> @@ -1119,7 +1120,7 @@ static int xlvbd_alloc_gendisk(blkif_sector_t capacity,
>   if (!VDEV_IS_EXTENDED(info->vdevice)) {
>   err = xen_translate_vdev(info->vdevice, , );
>   if (err)
> - return err; 
> + return err;

Cosmetic changes should go in a separate patch please.

Roger.