Re: [ANNOUNCE] ESFQ -- SFQ patches for Linux 2.6.24
David Miller wrote: From: Brock Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 20:30:58 -0600 Is this going to be merged anytime soon? If it gets submitted to the proper mailing list, it might. 'linux-net' is for user questions, it is not where the networking developers hang out, 'netdev' is. Then why do Alan and Jeff pass around patches on this (linux-net) list ? ;-) Regards, David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: zero-copy udp
From: Martin Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then I can mmap the buffer into user space (that was a big surprise to me because I thought mmap was only for files) It is. But then, on unix _everything_ is a file ;-) Regards, David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Network sharing without using NAT, possible?
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:11:17 + (UTC) On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 +, Mateus Interciso wrote: I've setted up the bridge normally ifconfig eth0 down ifconfig eth1 down ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl stp br0 on ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up but I can't ping 10.100.0.1. :O Am I missing something? Let me recall that the network setup now is like this: [Internet]---[Bridge][Windows 2k3]=[switch]computers Thanks. Mateus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Maybe, if I explain a little more about the fisical network we have, it may be easier to understand(or find the problem) The bridge works like this |---(eth0)---||---(NIC1)--| |---BRIDGE---| |---W2k3| Internet---|---(eth1)---| |---(NIC2)--|---[D-Link Switch]===LAN where NIC1 has the internet IP assigned by the ISP, and NIC2 has the internal IP 10.100.0.2, I would like to put the ip 10.100.0.1 on the bridge, so that I can access via ssh, and use internet there, so I can download ebtables to make the firewall, as well as other monithoring tools (like SNMP for instance). But when I put ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up it doesn't ping 10.100.0.2 for instance, am I missing something here? Ah, it is simple then. Set the linux br0 address to some other private range, for example ifconfig br0 10._101_.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up Then set some routes on it: to NIC1_IP over interface br0 (if it complains about IP address mismatch, write back and we will sort it out) Well that's it ;-) Regards, David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Network sharing without using NAT, possible?
From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:40 + (UTC) ifconfig eth0 down ifconfig eth1 down ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up brctl addbr br0 brctl addif br0 eth0 brctl addif br0 eth1 brctl stp br0 on ifconfig br0 10.100.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up but I can't ping 10.100.0.1. :O Am I missing something? iptables ? Regards, David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: Network sharing without using NAT, possible?
You can ask the ISP for more real IP addresses and then use one for the VoIP client. In our country*, many ISPs give 2-4 IP addresses by default. Regards, David * - Slovenia -Original Message- From: Mateus Interciso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:19:56 + (UTC) Subject: Network sharing without using NAT, possible? Hi all, I currently using iptables NAT for routing the internet trough 2 different sub-networks, and we are having some trouble with the NAT, specially for VoIP, so I was thinking if it's possible to make a router (like a CISCO IOS) using Zebra, that will, in other words, share the Internet trough the sub-networks, without using NAT, or in a better way. The question for this, is that we had a w2k3 server sharing the internet, and the VoIP was fine, since we changed the w2k3 for a Linux Box, the VoIP started acting very strangely, and I'm really running out of options here to make it fix, I though about this, is it possible? Thanks a lot. Zarnick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Working Qos/shaping product ?
Hi! I am looking for a Qos/traffic shaping package to use on a home network (LAN clients and a slow WAN to internet; typical home scenario, I guess). The reqirements are obvious : - one users traffic should not block the other ones - good ping for interactive traffic - upload does not clog download - you know ;-) Regards, David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-net in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
