From: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>
Don't hold onto dentry in lru list if need to re-lookup it anyway at next
access.
More advanced version of this patch would periodically flush out dentries
from the lru which have gone stale.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>
---
fs/fuse/dir.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/dir.c b/fs/fuse/dir.c
index dd0f64f7bc06..fd8636e67ae9 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dir.c
@@ -29,12 +29,26 @@ union fuse_dentry {
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
-static inline void fuse_dentry_settime(struct dentry *entry, u64 time)
+static void fuse_dentry_settime(struct dentry *dentry, u64 time)
{
- ((union fuse_dentry *) entry->d_fsdata)->time = time;
+ /*
+ * Mess with DCACHE_OP_DELETE because dput() will be faster without it.
+ * Don't care about races, either way it's just an optimization
+ */
+ if ((time && (dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_DELETE)) ||
+ (!time && !(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_DELETE))) {
+ spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ if (time)
+ dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_OP_DELETE;
+ else
+ dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_OP_DELETE;
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ }
+
+ ((union fuse_dentry *) dentry->d_fsdata)->time = time;
}
-static inline u64 fuse_dentry_time(struct dentry *entry)
+static inline u64 fuse_dentry_time(const struct dentry *entry)
{
return ((union fuse_dentry *) entry->d_fsdata)->time;
}
@@ -255,8 +269,14 @@ static void fuse_dentry_release(struct dentry *dentry)
kfree_rcu(fd, rcu);
}
+static int fuse_dentry_delete(const struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+ return time_before64(fuse_dentry_time(dentry), get_jiffies_64());
+}
+
const struct dentry_operations fuse_dentry_operations = {
.d_revalidate = fuse_dentry_revalidate,
+ .d_delete = fuse_dentry_delete,
.d_init = fuse_dentry_init,
.d_release = fuse_dentry_release,
};
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
