From: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogan...@nokia.com>
It is more efficient to use pwrdm_set_next_pwrst for mpu, core and neon
instead of set_pwrdm_state in idle loop. It is anyway known that those are
active in idle loop. So no need to use set_pwrdm_state.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogan...@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
index 5128b8c..1d10c4a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
@@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ static int omap3_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
core_state = PWRDM_POWER_RET;
}
- set_pwrdm_state(mpu_pd, mpu_state);
- set_pwrdm_state(core_pd, core_state);
+ pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(mpu_pd, mpu_state);
+ pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pd, core_state);
if (omap_irq_pending())
goto return_sleep_time;
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
index a6624a1..35c917e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
/* NEON control */
if (pwrdm_read_pwrst(neon_pwrdm) == PWRDM_POWER_ON)
- set_pwrdm_state(neon_pwrdm, mpu_next_state);
+ pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(neon_pwrdm, mpu_next_state);
/* PER */
per_next_state = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(per_pwrdm);
--
1.6.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
