Re: [PATCH 10/13] OMAP: omap_device: add flag to disable automatic bus-level suspend/resume
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Kevin Hilman wrote: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes: Hi Kevin, A few comments: Your add runtime PM support at bus-level series has a unstated dependency on this patch. If you fix one minor issue (below), it's probably easiest if you merge it with that other series to avoid cross-dependencies. If I switch (back) to just using pm_runtime_* API in the system PM path _noirq methods, then rather than setting this flag at the omap_device level, drivers that want to prevent this can simply do a runtime_pm_get_sync() if they want to prevent a bus-level suspend. Any thoughts/objectsion to that? Sounds fine to me. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 10/13] OMAP: omap_device: add flag to disable automatic bus-level suspend/resume
Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes: On Thu, 24 Jun 2010, Kevin Hilman wrote: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes: Hi Kevin, A few comments: Your add runtime PM support at bus-level series has a unstated dependency on this patch. If you fix one minor issue (below), it's probably easiest if you merge it with that other series to avoid cross-dependencies. If I switch (back) to just using pm_runtime_* API in the system PM path _noirq methods, then rather than setting this flag at the omap_device level, drivers that want to prevent this can simply do a runtime_pm_get_sync() if they want to prevent a bus-level suspend. Any thoughts/objectsion to that? Sounds fine to me. OK, good. Then I'll just drop this patch. Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH 10/13] OMAP: omap_device: add flag to disable automatic bus-level suspend/resume
As part of the runtime PM support, bus-level code can automatically handle the enable/idle for each omap_device. There are, however, some special cases where we don't want the bus-level layer to handle this, and instead handle it manually. Specific use cases are for omap_devices that are controlled inside the idle path (like UART.) Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com --- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h index 3694b62..2cdbcdd 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h @@ -68,12 +68,16 @@ struct omap_device { struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats; u32 dev_wakeup_lat; u32 _dev_wakeup_lat_limit; + u32 flags; u8 pm_lats_cnt; s8 pm_lat_level; u8 hwmods_cnt; u8 _state; }; +/* flags for struct omap_device */ +#define OMAP_DEVICE_NO_BUS_SUSPEND BIT(0) + /* Device driver interface (call via platform_data fn ptrs) */ int omap_device_enable(struct platform_device *pdev); @@ -142,6 +146,7 @@ struct omap_device_pm_latency { u32 flags; }; +/* flags for struct omap_device_pm_latency */ #define OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST BIT(1) /* Get omap_device pointer from platform_device pointer */ -- 1.7.0.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 10/13] OMAP: omap_device: add flag to disable automatic bus-level suspend/resume
Hi Kevin, A few comments: Your add runtime PM support at bus-level series has a unstated dependency on this patch. If you fix one minor issue (below), it's probably easiest if you merge it with that other series to avoid cross-dependencies. On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Kevin Hilman wrote: As part of the runtime PM support, bus-level code can automatically handle the enable/idle for each omap_device. There are, however, some special cases where we don't want the bus-level layer to handle this, and instead handle it manually. Specific use cases are for omap_devices that are controlled inside the idle path (like UART.) Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com --- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h index 3694b62..2cdbcdd 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h @@ -68,12 +68,16 @@ struct omap_device { struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats; u32 dev_wakeup_lat; u32 _dev_wakeup_lat_limit; + u32 flags; This should be a u8. Fix that and it is Acked-by: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com u8 pm_lats_cnt; s8 pm_lat_level; u8 hwmods_cnt; u8 _state; }; +/* flags for struct omap_device */ +#define OMAP_DEVICE_NO_BUS_SUSPEND BIT(0) + /* Device driver interface (call via platform_data fn ptrs) */ int omap_device_enable(struct platform_device *pdev); @@ -142,6 +146,7 @@ struct omap_device_pm_latency { u32 flags; }; +/* flags for struct omap_device_pm_latency */ #define OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST BIT(1) /* Get omap_device pointer from platform_device pointer */ -- 1.7.0.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html