Re: [PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-27 Thread Kevin Hilman
Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes:

 There is no more need to have saved_wakeup. Instead we can use
 context.wake_en which holds the current wakeup enable register
 context. This also means that the read from wakeup enable register
 is not needed.

 Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com

Looks right, but one question below...

 ---
  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   13 -
  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
 index 40a1fb2..64f15d5 100644
 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
 +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
 @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct gpio_bank {
   u16 irq;
   u16 virtual_irq_start;
   u32 suspend_wakeup;
 - u32 saved_wakeup;
   u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
   u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
   struct gpio_regs context;
 @@ -772,7 +771,7 @@ static int omap_mpuio_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
   unsigned long   flags;
  
   spin_lock_irqsave(bank-lock, flags);
 - bank-saved_wakeup = __raw_readl(mask_reg);
 + bank-context.wake_en = __raw_readl(mask_reg);

Why is this read needed?

Kevin

   __raw_writel(0x  ~bank-suspend_wakeup, mask_reg);
   spin_unlock_irqrestore(bank-lock, flags);
  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-27 Thread DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com wrote:
 Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com writes:

 There is no more need to have saved_wakeup. Instead we can use
 context.wake_en which holds the current wakeup enable register
 context. This also means that the read from wakeup enable register
 is not needed.

 Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com

 Looks right, but one question below...

 ---
  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   13 -
  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

 diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
 index 40a1fb2..64f15d5 100644
 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
 +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
 @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct gpio_bank {
       u16 irq;
       u16 virtual_irq_start;
       u32 suspend_wakeup;
 -     u32 saved_wakeup;
       u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
       u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
       struct gpio_regs context;
 @@ -772,7 +771,7 @@ static int omap_mpuio_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
       unsigned long           flags;

       spin_lock_irqsave(bank-lock, flags);
 -     bank-saved_wakeup = __raw_readl(mask_reg);
 +     bank-context.wake_en = __raw_readl(mask_reg);

 Why is this read needed?
Well, we don't really need as we already have context.wake_en updated elsewhere.
I will update this. Thanks.
--
Tarun

 Kevin

       __raw_writel(0x  ~bank-suspend_wakeup, mask_reg);
       spin_unlock_irqrestore(bank-lock, flags);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-23 Thread Tarun Kanti DebBarma
There is no more need to have saved_wakeup. Instead we can use
context.wake_en which holds the current wakeup enable register
context. This also means that the read from wakeup enable register
is not needed.

Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c |   13 -
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index 40a1fb2..64f15d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct gpio_bank {
u16 irq;
u16 virtual_irq_start;
u32 suspend_wakeup;
-   u32 saved_wakeup;
u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
struct gpio_regs context;
@@ -772,7 +771,7 @@ static int omap_mpuio_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
unsigned long   flags;
 
spin_lock_irqsave(bank-lock, flags);
-   bank-saved_wakeup = __raw_readl(mask_reg);
+   bank-context.wake_en = __raw_readl(mask_reg);
__raw_writel(0x  ~bank-suspend_wakeup, mask_reg);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(bank-lock, flags);
 
@@ -788,7 +787,7 @@ static int omap_mpuio_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
unsigned long   flags;
 
spin_lock_irqsave(bank-lock, flags);
-   __raw_writel(bank-saved_wakeup, mask_reg);
+   __raw_writel(bank-context.wake_en, mask_reg);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(bank-lock, flags);
 
return 0;
@@ -1133,7 +1132,6 @@ static int omap_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
struct gpio_bank *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
void __iomem *base = bank-base;
-   void __iomem *wakeup_enable;
unsigned long flags;
 
if (!bank-mod_usage || !bank-loses_context)
@@ -1142,10 +1140,7 @@ static int omap_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
if (!bank-regs-wkup_en || !bank-suspend_wakeup)
return 0;
 
-   wakeup_enable = bank-base + bank-regs-wkup_en;
-
spin_lock_irqsave(bank-lock, flags);
-   bank-saved_wakeup = __raw_readl(wakeup_enable);
_gpio_rmw(base, bank-regs-wkup_en, 0x, 0);
_gpio_rmw(base, bank-regs-wkup_en, bank-suspend_wakeup, 1);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(bank-lock, flags);
@@ -1163,12 +1158,12 @@ static int omap_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
if (!bank-mod_usage || !bank-loses_context)
return 0;
 
-   if (!bank-regs-wkup_en || !bank-saved_wakeup)
+   if (!bank-regs-wkup_en || !bank-context.wake_en)
return 0;
 
spin_lock_irqsave(bank-lock, flags);
_gpio_rmw(base, bank-regs-wkup_en, 0x, 0);
-   _gpio_rmw(base, bank-regs-wkup_en, bank-saved_wakeup, 1);
+   _gpio_rmw(base, bank-regs-wkup_en, bank-context.wake_en, 1);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(bank-lock, flags);
 
return 0;
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/6] gpio/omap: remove saved_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank

2012-02-23 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 05:40:27PM +0530, Tarun Kanti DebBarma wrote:
 There is no more need to have saved_wakeup. Instead we can use
 context.wake_en which holds the current wakeup enable register
 context. This also means that the read from wakeup enable register
 is not needed.
 
 Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma tarun.ka...@ti.com

Likewise:

Acked-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com

-- 
balbi


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature