Re: [PATCH 065/493] i2c: remove use of __devexit_p
Wolfram Sang writes: --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:20:14 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer needed. =20 As mentioned on the lm-sensors list for hwmon patches already, I think it would be much clearer to not split __devexit, __devexit_p, __devinit etc. removal into separate patches. One patch per subsystem would be easier to review and apply. If patches grow too large then you'd rather split in a different direction, for example drivers/i2c/muxes vs. drivers/i2c/busses or even grouped by related bus drivers (see entries I2C OVER PARALLEL PORT and I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC in MAINTAINERS for examples of meaningful groups.) I agree with Jean here. Is there a V2 planned? With a change like this? Yes, my plan is to redo the patches for the i2c subsystem. -- Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 065/493] i2c: remove use of __devexit_p
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:20:14 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer needed. As mentioned on the lm-sensors list for hwmon patches already, I think it would be much clearer to not split __devexit, __devexit_p, __devinit etc. removal into separate patches. One patch per subsystem would be easier to review and apply. If patches grow too large then you'd rather split in a different direction, for example drivers/i2c/muxes vs. drivers/i2c/busses or even grouped by related bus drivers (see entries I2C OVER PARALLEL PORT and I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC in MAINTAINERS for examples of meaningful groups.) I agree with Jean here. Is there a V2 planned? With a change like this? -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang| Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH 065/493] i2c: remove use of __devexit_p
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:20:14 -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote: CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer needed. As mentioned on the lm-sensors list for hwmon patches already, I think it would be much clearer to not split __devexit, __devexit_p, __devinit etc. removal into separate patches. One patch per subsystem would be easier to review and apply. If patches grow too large then you'd rather split in a different direction, for example drivers/i2c/muxes vs. drivers/i2c/busses or even grouped by related bus drivers (see entries I2C OVER PARALLEL PORT and I2C/SMBUS CONTROLLER DRIVERS FOR PC in MAINTAINERS for examples of meaningful groups.) -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
