Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-09-23 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Suman Anna  [150903 16:01]:
>  On 07/23/2015 02:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > OK maybe check the syss/sysc registers involved here for each hardware
> > module here and which driver tinkers with which registers? This will
> > make things a lot easier in the long run for sure.
> 
> The OMAP remoteproc driver typically deals with only the reset registers
> and another register in the Control module for programming the boot
> address for the DSPs. You can look up the OMAP4 hwmod data for
> reference. There is currently a .prcm.omap4.modulemode set for these,
> and I have a patch to remove those. I haven't yet posted it yet [1],
> because OMAP remoteprocs are still not bootable on mainline.

Thanks for checking that. Like we chatted, let's make sure we don't
end up with iommu and remoteproc "consumer device" specific data
in the iommu and remoteproc code.

Regards,

Tony

> [1]
> http://git.ti.com/gitweb/?p=rpmsg/remoteproc.git;a=commit;h=0dd2a6a2d8869ee6cec92f75d70663259a41c11f
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-09-03 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Tony,

Sorry for the long delay in getting back on this. I will repost the
series once 4.3-rc1 is out, but at the moment I do not think any changes
are required. Let me know if you still need any additional details.

 On 07/23/2015 02:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Suman Anna  [150722 09:25]:
>> On 07/22/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.
>>
>> This is not a SoC-level register, but a register within a sub-module of
>> the DSP processor sub-system. The DSP_SYSTEM sub-module in general is
>> described in Section 5.3.3 of the TRM [1], and it implements different
>> functionalities like the PRCM handshaking, wakeup logic and DSP
>> subsystem top-level configuration. It is a module present within the DSP
>> processor sub-system, so can only be accessed when the sub-system is
>> clocked and the appropriate reset is released.
>
> OK so if it's specific to the DSP driver along the lines of sysc and
> syss registers.

 There will be those registers too within the MMU config register space,
 even for DRA7xx MMUs. This is different, think of it like a register in
 the Control module except that it is present within the DSP sub-system
 instead of at the SoC level.
>>>
>>> And what is taking care of pm_runtime_get here to ensure the module
>>> is powered and clocked?
>>
>> pm_runtime_get_sync is indeed getting invoked, its just the current
>> patch doesn't include the code block that invokes it. The function that
>> invokes omap2_iommu_enable does so after a call to the
>> pm_runtime_get_sync() call.
> 
> OK 
> 
>>> I think you are missing a layer here and it's the Linux kernel side
>>> device driver for DSP that initializes things.
>>
>> We already have separate drivers for MMUs (omap-iommu) and the processor
>> management (omap-rproc). The former manages all the low-level
>> programming sequences for the MMUs, while the latter manages the
>> low-level reset etc, and is a client user of the respective IOMMU
>> device. Both integrate into the respective frameworks. The IOMMU API
>> invocations are handled in the remoteproc core, with the OMAP remoteproc
>> driver publishing itself as having an MMU with the remoteproc core. The
>> IOMMU API invoke the appropriate iommu_ops.
>>
>> You can lookup the functions rproc_enable_iommu()/rproc_disable_iommu()
>> in the remoteproc core. The IOMMU enabling sequences happen within the
>> iommu_attach_device() API. The call flow is
>> iommu_attach_device()->omap_iommu_attach_dev()->omap_iommu_attach()->
>> iommu_enable()->
>>omap_device_deassert_hardreset, pm_runtime_get_sync, omap2_iommu_enable.
> 
> OK. The thing to check here is that you have a separate device driver
> for each sysc/syss device registers. This is because each hardware module
> can be independently clocked and idled. Otherwise things will break at
> some point. And no "things are configured for autoidle" or "we're not
> doing PM is not a good excuse here" :)
> 
> Can you please check that? If the remoteproc driver and iommu driver
> are tinkering with registers in separate hardware modules, we have
> a layering violation. My guess is that we have at least two hardware
> modules involved here, one for the iommu and one for the DSP device.

Only the IOMMU has a SYSC/SYSS device register. It has both a soft-reset
as well as a hard-reset line. The IOMMU stays in reset, and its state
machine/programming is controlled through the remoteproc driver. The
clock source is also single clock going into the remote processor
subsystem, and split up internally to feed the memories and the
processors. For the PRCM to auto-gate the clocks, we also need the
processor to be executing a IDLE (DSPs) or WFI/WFE (Cortex M3/M4s). Just
the IOMMU will allow the OCP idle because of the associated sysc/syss
registers. Depending on the remote processor, there might be a separate
internal module (like the DSPs usually have a separate SYSC module), but
that programming is left to the software running on the DSP.

>  
> Typically we handle these registers by mapping them to the PM runtime
> functions for the interconnect so we can reset and idle the hardware
> modules even if there is no driver, see for example
> omap54xx_mmu_dsp_hwmod.

 I haven't yet submitted the DRA7xx hwmods, but they will look almost
 exactly like the OMAP5 ones. The reset and idle on these are in general
 not effective at boot time since these are also controlled by a
 hard-reset line, so that's left to the drivers to deal with it through
 the omap_device_deassert_hardreset API.
>>>
>>> If the MMU configuration is one time init, it may make sense to add
>>> it to the hwmod reset function. However, if the Linux kernel side
>>> driver needs to configure things depending on the DSP firmware, it
>>> should be done in the kernel side device driver.
>>
>> 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-07-28 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150724 09:27]:
 Hi Tony,
 
 On 07/23/2015 11:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
  * Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150723 09:25]:
  Hi Tony,
 
  On 07/23/2015 02:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
  * Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150722 09:25]:
  On 07/22/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
 
  I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.
 
  This is not a SoC-level register, but a register within a sub-module of
  the DSP processor sub-system. The DSP_SYSTEM sub-module in general is
  described in Section 5.3.3 of the TRM [1], and it implements different
  functionalities like the PRCM handshaking, wakeup logic and DSP
  subsystem top-level configuration. It is a module present within the DSP
  processor sub-system, so can only be accessed when the sub-system is
  clocked and the appropriate reset is released.
 
  OK so if it's specific to the DSP driver along the lines of sysc and
  syss registers.
 
  There will be those registers too within the MMU config register space,
  even for DRA7xx MMUs. This is different, think of it like a register in
  the Control module except that it is present within the DSP sub-system
  instead of at the SoC level.
  
  And what is taking care of pm_runtime_get here to ensure the module
  is powered and clocked?
 
 pm_runtime_get_sync is indeed getting invoked, its just the current
 patch doesn't include the code block that invokes it. The function that
 invokes omap2_iommu_enable does so after a call to the
 pm_runtime_get_sync() call.

OK 

  I think you are missing a layer here and it's the Linux kernel side
  device driver for DSP that initializes things.
 
 We already have separate drivers for MMUs (omap-iommu) and the processor
 management (omap-rproc). The former manages all the low-level
 programming sequences for the MMUs, while the latter manages the
 low-level reset etc, and is a client user of the respective IOMMU
 device. Both integrate into the respective frameworks. The IOMMU API
 invocations are handled in the remoteproc core, with the OMAP remoteproc
 driver publishing itself as having an MMU with the remoteproc core. The
 IOMMU API invoke the appropriate iommu_ops.
 
 You can lookup the functions rproc_enable_iommu()/rproc_disable_iommu()
 in the remoteproc core. The IOMMU enabling sequences happen within the
 iommu_attach_device() API. The call flow is
 iommu_attach_device()-omap_iommu_attach_dev()-omap_iommu_attach()-
 iommu_enable()-
omap_device_deassert_hardreset, pm_runtime_get_sync, omap2_iommu_enable.

OK. The thing to check here is that you have a separate device driver
for each sysc/syss device registers. This is because each hardware module
can be independently clocked and idled. Otherwise things will break at
some point. And no things are configured for autoidle or we're not
doing PM is not a good excuse here :)

Can you please check that? If the remoteproc driver and iommu driver
are tinkering with registers in separate hardware modules, we have
a layering violation. My guess is that we have at least two hardware
modules involved here, one for the iommu and one for the DSP device.
 
  Typically we handle these registers by mapping them to the PM runtime
  functions for the interconnect so we can reset and idle the hardware
  modules even if there is no driver, see for example
  omap54xx_mmu_dsp_hwmod.
 
  I haven't yet submitted the DRA7xx hwmods, but they will look almost
  exactly like the OMAP5 ones. The reset and idle on these are in general
  not effective at boot time since these are also controlled by a
  hard-reset line, so that's left to the drivers to deal with it through
  the omap_device_deassert_hardreset API.
  
  If the MMU configuration is one time init, it may make sense to add
  it to the hwmod reset function. However, if the Linux kernel side
  driver needs to configure things depending on the DSP firmware, it
  should be done in the kernel side device driver.
 
 The MMU configuration comes into picture whenever the remoteproc driver
 is being booted and shut down, and also during suspend (no support for
 this yet in mainline on OMAP rproc). Today, the hwmod
 _enable/_idle/reset functions alone are not enough to power on the OMAP
 remoteproc/iommus. We need sequencing calls to both
 omap_device_assert/_deassert_hardreset (done through pdata-quirks) and
 pm_runtime API to achieve this.

Right and that's why I'm worried that we have multiple hardware modules
involved :)  
 
  We should use some Linux generic framework for configuring these
  bits to avoid nasty dependencies between various hardware modules
  on the SoC.
 
  What does DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register do? It seems it's probably
  a regulator or a gate clock? If so, it should be set up as a
  regulator or a clock and then the omap-iommu driver can just
  use regulator or clcok framework to request the resource.
 
  No, its neither. It is a control bit that dictates whether the
  processor/EDMA addresses go through the respective MMU 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-07-24 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Tony,

On 07/23/2015 11:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
 * Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150723 09:25]:
 Hi Tony,

 On 07/23/2015 02:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
 * Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150722 09:25]:
 On 07/22/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:

 I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.

 This is not a SoC-level register, but a register within a sub-module of
 the DSP processor sub-system. The DSP_SYSTEM sub-module in general is
 described in Section 5.3.3 of the TRM [1], and it implements different
 functionalities like the PRCM handshaking, wakeup logic and DSP
 subsystem top-level configuration. It is a module present within the DSP
 processor sub-system, so can only be accessed when the sub-system is
 clocked and the appropriate reset is released.

 OK so if it's specific to the DSP driver along the lines of sysc and
 syss registers.

 There will be those registers too within the MMU config register space,
 even for DRA7xx MMUs. This is different, think of it like a register in
 the Control module except that it is present within the DSP sub-system
 instead of at the SoC level.
 
 And what is taking care of pm_runtime_get here to ensure the module
 is powered and clocked?

pm_runtime_get_sync is indeed getting invoked, its just the current
patch doesn't include the code block that invokes it. The function that
invokes omap2_iommu_enable does so after a call to the
pm_runtime_get_sync() call.

 
 I think you are missing a layer here and it's the Linux kernel side
 device driver for DSP that initializes things.

We already have separate drivers for MMUs (omap-iommu) and the processor
management (omap-rproc). The former manages all the low-level
programming sequences for the MMUs, while the latter manages the
low-level reset etc, and is a client user of the respective IOMMU
device. Both integrate into the respective frameworks. The IOMMU API
invocations are handled in the remoteproc core, with the OMAP remoteproc
driver publishing itself as having an MMU with the remoteproc core. The
IOMMU API invoke the appropriate iommu_ops.

You can lookup the functions rproc_enable_iommu()/rproc_disable_iommu()
in the remoteproc core. The IOMMU enabling sequences happen within the
iommu_attach_device() API. The call flow is
iommu_attach_device()-omap_iommu_attach_dev()-omap_iommu_attach()-
iommu_enable()-
   omap_device_deassert_hardreset, pm_runtime_get_sync, omap2_iommu_enable.

  
 Typically we handle these registers by mapping them to the PM runtime
 functions for the interconnect so we can reset and idle the hardware
 modules even if there is no driver, see for example
 omap54xx_mmu_dsp_hwmod.

 I haven't yet submitted the DRA7xx hwmods, but they will look almost
 exactly like the OMAP5 ones. The reset and idle on these are in general
 not effective at boot time since these are also controlled by a
 hard-reset line, so that's left to the drivers to deal with it through
 the omap_device_deassert_hardreset API.
 
 If the MMU configuration is one time init, it may make sense to add
 it to the hwmod reset function. However, if the Linux kernel side
 driver needs to configure things depending on the DSP firmware, it
 should be done in the kernel side device driver.

The MMU configuration comes into picture whenever the remoteproc driver
is being booted and shut down, and also during suspend (no support for
this yet in mainline on OMAP rproc). Today, the hwmod
_enable/_idle/reset functions alone are not enough to power on the OMAP
remoteproc/iommus. We need sequencing calls to both
omap_device_assert/_deassert_hardreset (done through pdata-quirks) and
pm_runtime API to achieve this.


  
 We should use some Linux generic framework for configuring these
 bits to avoid nasty dependencies between various hardware modules
 on the SoC.

 What does DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register do? It seems it's probably
 a regulator or a gate clock? If so, it should be set up as a
 regulator or a clock and then the omap-iommu driver can just
 use regulator or clcok framework to request the resource.

 No, its neither. It is a control bit that dictates whether the
 processor/EDMA addresses go through the respective MMU or not. The
 register currently has 4 bits (bit 0 in each nibble), one each for
 enabling each MMU and requesting an MMU abort on each. The MMU
 integration and enablement notes are detailed in Section 5.3.6 of the
 TRM [1], and the DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register layout is in Table 5-28
 (Page 1641).

 OK yeah seems like it should be handled by the DSP driver during
 probe after doing pm_runtime_get. Then the driver can configure
 things like IOMMU and load firmware. Or am I missing something here?

 The DSP (remoteproc) driver uses the generic IOMMU API, and all the
 IOMMU enabling sequence is transparent to the DSP driver. So, any
 configuration/enabling sequence specific to the IOMMU has to be handled
 within the respective IOMMU platform driver that gets integrated into
 the IOMMU API.
 
 To me it 

Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-07-23 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150723 09:25]:
 Hi Tony,
 
 On 07/23/2015 02:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
  * Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150722 09:25]:
  On 07/22/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
 
  I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.
 
  This is not a SoC-level register, but a register within a sub-module of
  the DSP processor sub-system. The DSP_SYSTEM sub-module in general is
  described in Section 5.3.3 of the TRM [1], and it implements different
  functionalities like the PRCM handshaking, wakeup logic and DSP
  subsystem top-level configuration. It is a module present within the DSP
  processor sub-system, so can only be accessed when the sub-system is
  clocked and the appropriate reset is released.
  
  OK so if it's specific to the DSP driver along the lines of sysc and
  syss registers.
 
 There will be those registers too within the MMU config register space,
 even for DRA7xx MMUs. This is different, think of it like a register in
 the Control module except that it is present within the DSP sub-system
 instead of at the SoC level.

And what is taking care of pm_runtime_get here to ensure the module
is powered and clocked?

I think you are missing a layer here and it's the Linux kernel side
device driver for DSP that initializes things.
 
  Typically we handle these registers by mapping them to the PM runtime
  functions for the interconnect so we can reset and idle the hardware
  modules even if there is no driver, see for example
  omap54xx_mmu_dsp_hwmod.
 
 I haven't yet submitted the DRA7xx hwmods, but they will look almost
 exactly like the OMAP5 ones. The reset and idle on these are in general
 not effective at boot time since these are also controlled by a
 hard-reset line, so that's left to the drivers to deal with it through
 the omap_device_deassert_hardreset API.

If the MMU configuration is one time init, it may make sense to add
it to the hwmod reset function. However, if the Linux kernel side
driver needs to configure things depending on the DSP firmware, it
should be done in the kernel side device driver. 
 
  We should use some Linux generic framework for configuring these
  bits to avoid nasty dependencies between various hardware modules
  on the SoC.
 
  What does DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register do? It seems it's probably
  a regulator or a gate clock? If so, it should be set up as a
  regulator or a clock and then the omap-iommu driver can just
  use regulator or clcok framework to request the resource.
 
  No, its neither. It is a control bit that dictates whether the
  processor/EDMA addresses go through the respective MMU or not. The
  register currently has 4 bits (bit 0 in each nibble), one each for
  enabling each MMU and requesting an MMU abort on each. The MMU
  integration and enablement notes are detailed in Section 5.3.6 of the
  TRM [1], and the DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register layout is in Table 5-28
  (Page 1641).
  
  OK yeah seems like it should be handled by the DSP driver during
  probe after doing pm_runtime_get. Then the driver can configure
  things like IOMMU and load firmware. Or am I missing something here?
 
 The DSP (remoteproc) driver uses the generic IOMMU API, and all the
 IOMMU enabling sequence is transparent to the DSP driver. So, any
 configuration/enabling sequence specific to the IOMMU has to be handled
 within the respective IOMMU platform driver that gets integrated into
 the IOMMU API.

To me it seems you still need a DSP kernel driver to manage the
DSP hardware for PM runtime. I don't see how iommu and remoteproc
alone would be sufficient here. You end up sprinkling DSP driver
specific code to the iommu and remoteproc layers.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-07-23 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Tony,

On 07/23/2015 02:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
 * Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150722 09:25]:
 On 07/22/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:

 I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.

 This is not a SoC-level register, but a register within a sub-module of
 the DSP processor sub-system. The DSP_SYSTEM sub-module in general is
 described in Section 5.3.3 of the TRM [1], and it implements different
 functionalities like the PRCM handshaking, wakeup logic and DSP
 subsystem top-level configuration. It is a module present within the DSP
 processor sub-system, so can only be accessed when the sub-system is
 clocked and the appropriate reset is released.
 
 OK so if it's specific to the DSP driver along the lines of sysc and
 syss registers.

There will be those registers too within the MMU config register space,
even for DRA7xx MMUs. This is different, think of it like a register in
the Control module except that it is present within the DSP sub-system
instead of at the SoC level.

 
 Typically we handle these registers by mapping them to the PM runtime
 functions for the interconnect so we can reset and idle the hardware
 modules even if there is no driver, see for example
 omap54xx_mmu_dsp_hwmod.

I haven't yet submitted the DRA7xx hwmods, but they will look almost
exactly like the OMAP5 ones. The reset and idle on these are in general
not effective at boot time since these are also controlled by a
hard-reset line, so that's left to the drivers to deal with it through
the omap_device_deassert_hardreset API.

  
 We should use some Linux generic framework for configuring these
 bits to avoid nasty dependencies between various hardware modules
 on the SoC.

 What does DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register do? It seems it's probably
 a regulator or a gate clock? If so, it should be set up as a
 regulator or a clock and then the omap-iommu driver can just
 use regulator or clcok framework to request the resource.

 No, its neither. It is a control bit that dictates whether the
 processor/EDMA addresses go through the respective MMU or not. The
 register currently has 4 bits (bit 0 in each nibble), one each for
 enabling each MMU and requesting an MMU abort on each. The MMU
 integration and enablement notes are detailed in Section 5.3.6 of the
 TRM [1], and the DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register layout is in Table 5-28
 (Page 1641).
 
 OK yeah seems like it should be handled by the DSP driver during
 probe after doing pm_runtime_get. Then the driver can configure
 things like IOMMU and load firmware. Or am I missing something here?

The DSP (remoteproc) driver uses the generic IOMMU API, and all the
IOMMU enabling sequence is transparent to the DSP driver. So, any
configuration/enabling sequence specific to the IOMMU has to be handled
within the respective IOMMU platform driver that gets integrated into
the IOMMU API.

regards
Suman

 
  
 [1] http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruhz6/spruhz6.pdf

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-07-23 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150722 09:25]:
 On 07/22/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
  
  I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.
 
 This is not a SoC-level register, but a register within a sub-module of
 the DSP processor sub-system. The DSP_SYSTEM sub-module in general is
 described in Section 5.3.3 of the TRM [1], and it implements different
 functionalities like the PRCM handshaking, wakeup logic and DSP
 subsystem top-level configuration. It is a module present within the DSP
 processor sub-system, so can only be accessed when the sub-system is
 clocked and the appropriate reset is released.

OK so if it's specific to the DSP driver along the lines of sysc and
syss registers.

Typically we handle these registers by mapping them to the PM runtime
functions for the interconnect so we can reset and idle the hardware
modules even if there is no driver, see for example
omap54xx_mmu_dsp_hwmod.
 
  We should use some Linux generic framework for configuring these
  bits to avoid nasty dependencies between various hardware modules
  on the SoC.
  
  What does DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register do? It seems it's probably
  a regulator or a gate clock? If so, it should be set up as a
  regulator or a clock and then the omap-iommu driver can just
  use regulator or clcok framework to request the resource.
 
 No, its neither. It is a control bit that dictates whether the
 processor/EDMA addresses go through the respective MMU or not. The
 register currently has 4 bits (bit 0 in each nibble), one each for
 enabling each MMU and requesting an MMU abort on each. The MMU
 integration and enablement notes are detailed in Section 5.3.6 of the
 TRM [1], and the DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register layout is in Table 5-28
 (Page 1641).

OK yeah seems like it should be handled by the DSP driver during
probe after doing pm_runtime_get. Then the driver can configure
things like IOMMU and load firmware. Or am I missing something here?

Regards,

Tony

 
 [1] http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruhz6/spruhz6.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-07-22 Thread Suman Anna
Hi Tony,

On 07/22/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
 * Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150721 16:58]:
 --- a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c
 +++ b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c
 @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
  #include linux/of_iommu.h
  #include linux/of_irq.h
  #include linux/of_platform.h
 +#include linux/regmap.h
 +#include linux/mfd/syscon.h
  
  #include asm/cacheflush.h
  
 @@ -112,6 +114,18 @@ void omap_iommu_restore_ctx(struct device *dev)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap_iommu_restore_ctx);
  
 +static void dra7_cfg_dspsys_mmu(struct omap_iommu *obj, bool enable)
 +{
 +u32 val, mask;
 +
 +if (!obj-syscfg)
 +return;
 +
 +mask = (1  (obj-id * DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG_EN_SHIFT));
 +val = enable ? mask : 0;
 +regmap_update_bits(obj-syscfg, DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG, mask, val);
 +}
 +
  static void __iommu_set_twl(struct omap_iommu *obj, bool on)
 
 I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.

This is not a SoC-level register, but a register within a sub-module of
the DSP processor sub-system. The DSP_SYSTEM sub-module in general is
described in Section 5.3.3 of the TRM [1], and it implements different
functionalities like the PRCM handshaking, wakeup logic and DSP
subsystem top-level configuration. It is a module present within the DSP
processor sub-system, so can only be accessed when the sub-system is
clocked and the appropriate reset is released.

 We should use some Linux generic framework for configuring these
 bits to avoid nasty dependencies between various hardware modules
 on the SoC.
 
 What does DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register do? It seems it's probably
 a regulator or a gate clock? If so, it should be set up as a
 regulator or a clock and then the omap-iommu driver can just
 use regulator or clcok framework to request the resource.

No, its neither. It is a control bit that dictates whether the
processor/EDMA addresses go through the respective MMU or not. The
register currently has 4 bits (bit 0 in each nibble), one each for
enabling each MMU and requesting an MMU abort on each. The MMU
integration and enablement notes are detailed in Section 5.3.6 of the
TRM [1], and the DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register layout is in Table 5-28
(Page 1641).

regards
Suman

[1] http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruhz6/spruhz6.pdf


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/omap: Add support for configuring dsp iommus on DRA7xx

2015-07-21 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com [150721 16:58]:
 --- a/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c
 +++ b/drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c
 @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
  #include linux/of_iommu.h
  #include linux/of_irq.h
  #include linux/of_platform.h
 +#include linux/regmap.h
 +#include linux/mfd/syscon.h
  
  #include asm/cacheflush.h
  
 @@ -112,6 +114,18 @@ void omap_iommu_restore_ctx(struct device *dev)
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap_iommu_restore_ctx);
  
 +static void dra7_cfg_dspsys_mmu(struct omap_iommu *obj, bool enable)
 +{
 + u32 val, mask;
 +
 + if (!obj-syscfg)
 + return;
 +
 + mask = (1  (obj-id * DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG_EN_SHIFT));
 + val = enable ? mask : 0;
 + regmap_update_bits(obj-syscfg, DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG, mask, val);
 +}
 +
  static void __iommu_set_twl(struct omap_iommu *obj, bool on)

I don't like using syscon for tinkering directly with SoC registers.

We should use some Linux generic framework for configuring these
bits to avoid nasty dependencies between various hardware modules
on the SoC.

What does DSP_SYS_MMU_CONFIG register do? It seems it's probably
a regulator or a gate clock? If so, it should be set up as a
regulator or a clock and then the omap-iommu driver can just
use regulator or clcok framework to request the resource.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html