Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: Fix register read in TMU

2015-10-16 Thread Kukjin Kim
On 10/13/15 08:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> From: Sudip Mukherjee 
> 
> The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected soc is
> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were reading from the wrong
> register in the case of SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi 
> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski 
> Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for Exynos5433 TMU")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c 
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 0bae8cc6c23a..ca920b0ecf8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct 
> exynos_tmu_data *data,
>  
>   if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
>   emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> - if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> + else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
>   emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
>   else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
>   emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;

Applied, thanks.

- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] thermal: exynos: Fix register read in TMU

2015-10-12 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
From: Sudip Mukherjee 

The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected soc is
SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were reading from the wrong
register in the case of SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee 
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi 
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski 
Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for Exynos5433 TMU")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
---
 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c 
b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 0bae8cc6c23a..ca920b0ecf8f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct 
exynos_tmu_data *data,
 
if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
-   if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
+   else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: fix register read in TMU

2015-10-09 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
W dniu 09.10.2015 o 21:07, Lukasz Majewski pisze:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
>> 2015-10-08 23:21 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee
>> :
>>> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:43:52AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
 2015-10-01 23:12 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee
 :
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>> 2015-10-01 20:39 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee
>> :
>>> The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected
>>> soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were
>>> reading from the wrong register in the case of
>>> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.
>>
>> How the value is overwritten if the soc is Exynos5260? I can't
>> see it (although the "else if" is still more obvious than "if"
>> but how does the description match the code?).
> The code here is:
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
> emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
> else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
> else
> emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON;
>
> So if data->soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260 , then emul_con becomes
> EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON. But again for the else part it will become
> EXYNOS_EMUL_CON.

 Indeed!

 Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for
 Exynos5433 TMU")

 Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>> Who will pick this one up? I still do not see it in linux-next.
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I guess it is a patch for Lukasz.
>>
>> Lukasz,
>> Do you plan to pick it up or maybe this should go through samsung-soc
>> tree?
> 
> This is the only one patch, which is waiting in my queue. Since no more
> fixes available, please feel free to grab this patch to samsung-soc.
> 
> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski 

Okay, thanks! Applied to fixes for current cycle. I'll it send later to
Kukjin (unless he picks it as well).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: fix register read in TMU

2015-10-09 Thread Lukasz Majewski
Hi Krzysztof,

> 2015-10-08 23:21 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee
> :
> > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:43:52AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> 2015-10-01 23:12 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee
> >> :
> >> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> 2015-10-01 20:39 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee
> >> >> :
> >> >> > The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected
> >> >> > soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were
> >> >> > reading from the wrong register in the case of
> >> >> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.
> >> >>
> >> >> How the value is overwritten if the soc is Exynos5260? I can't
> >> >> see it (although the "else if" is still more obvious than "if"
> >> >> but how does the description match the code?).
> >> > The code here is:
> >> > if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
> >> > emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> >> > if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> >> > emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
> >> > else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> >> > emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
> >> > else
> >> > emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON;
> >> >
> >> > So if data->soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260 , then emul_con becomes
> >> > EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON. But again for the else part it will become
> >> > EXYNOS_EMUL_CON.
> >>
> >> Indeed!
> >>
> >> Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for
> >> Exynos5433 TMU")
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > Who will pick this one up? I still do not see it in linux-next.
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I guess it is a patch for Lukasz.
> 
> Lukasz,
> Do you plan to pick it up or maybe this should go through samsung-soc
> tree?

This is the only one patch, which is waiting in my queue. Since no more
fixes available, please feel free to grab this patch to samsung-soc.

Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski 

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof


-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: fix register read in TMU

2015-10-08 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:43:52AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2015-10-01 23:12 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee :
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> 2015-10-01 20:39 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee :
> >> > The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected soc is
> >> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were reading from the wrong
> >> > register in the case of SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.
> >>
> >> How the value is overwritten if the soc is Exynos5260? I can't see it
> >> (although the "else if" is still more obvious than "if" but how does
> >> the description match the code?).
> > The code here is:
> > if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
> > emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> > if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> > emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
> > else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> > emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
> > else
> > emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON;
> >
> > So if data->soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260 , then emul_con becomes
> > EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON. But again for the else part it will become
> > EXYNOS_EMUL_CON.
> 
> Indeed!
> 
> Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for Exynos5433 TMU")
> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 

Hi Krzysztof,
Who will pick this one up? I still do not see it in linux-next.

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH] thermal: exynos: fix register read in TMU

2015-10-01 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected soc is
SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were reading from the wrong
register in the case of SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee 
---
 drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c 
b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index 0bae8cc..ca920b0 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct 
exynos_tmu_data *data,
 
if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
-   if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
+   else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: fix register read in TMU

2015-10-01 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-01 23:12 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee :
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:18:57PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 2015-10-01 20:39 GMT+09:00 Sudip Mukherjee :
>> > The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected soc is
>> > SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were reading from the wrong
>> > register in the case of SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.
>>
>> How the value is overwritten if the soc is Exynos5260? I can't see it
>> (although the "else if" is still more obvious than "if" but how does
>> the description match the code?).
> The code here is:
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
> emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
> else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
> emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
> else
> emul_con = EXYNOS_EMUL_CON;
>
> So if data->soc is SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260 , then emul_con becomes
> EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON. But again for the else part it will become
> EXYNOS_EMUL_CON.

Indeed!

Fixes: 488c7455d74c ("thermal: exynos: Add the support for Exynos5433 TMU")

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski 

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH] thermal: exynos: fix register read in TMU

2015-10-01 Thread Chanwoo Choi
On 2015년 10월 01일 20:39, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> The value of emul_con was getting overwritten if the selected soc is
> SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260. And so as a result we were reading from the wrong
> register in the case of SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee 
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c 
> b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index 0bae8cc..ca920b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void exynos4412_tmu_set_emulation(struct 
> exynos_tmu_data *data,
>  
>   if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5260)
>   emul_con = EXYNOS5260_EMUL_CON;
> - if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
> + else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)
>   emul_con = EXYNOS5433_TMU_EMUL_CON;
>   else if (data->soc == SOC_ARCH_EXYNOS7)
>   emul_con = EXYNOS7_TMU_REG_EMUL_CON;
> 

Thanks for your point out. Looks good to me. 

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi 

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html