Re: [PATCH 0/3] MCPM: clarify boot CPU situation wrt CCI

2014-06-25 Thread Kevin Hilman
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Doug Anderson diand...@google.com wrote:
 Kevin,

 On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
 - Leave mau_epll enabled
   http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262259.html

 Can you drop your mau_epll one and instead pick just
 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4333581/?

 I noticed that Tushar has only been pushing for that patch to be
 applied and I'm going to guess that the leave mau_epll enabled isn't
 needed.  I just tested myself and confirmed that things are happy.

I replied on the other thread too, but just to be thorough...

Picking the above patch alone, I still get the boot hang.  Adding
'clk_ignore_unused' to the command line gets things booting again,
which suggest there's still a missing piece of the puzzle.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] MCPM: clarify boot CPU situation wrt CCI

2014-06-24 Thread Kevin Hilman
Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org writes:

 For the background story, please see:

 http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/thread=32807

 I sat on those patches for a while but they are the best I could think of
 in terms of implementation.  To ease merging I suggest I collect all the
 ACK's and Tested-by's and submit them all at once to RMK's patch system.

Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org

I tested this series on Exynos5 Peach Pi (a.k.a. 13 ARM Chromebook 2)
and verified all 8 cores are booting up.

Kevin

P.S. FYI for anyone else wanting to try this on peach-pi, I still need a
couple other out of tree clock related patches in order to boot fully.
Until the final versions are merged, I'm using these:

- Doug's aclk66 clock removal for earlyprintk support
  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262225.html
- Leave mau_epll enabled
  http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262259.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 0/3] MCPM: clarify boot CPU situation wrt CCI

2014-06-24 Thread Doug Anderson
Kevin,

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
 - Leave mau_epll enabled
   http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-June/262259.html

Can you drop your mau_epll one and instead pick just
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4333581/?

I noticed that Tushar has only been pushing for that patch to be
applied and I'm going to guess that the leave mau_epll enabled isn't
needed.  I just tested myself and confirmed that things are happy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH 0/3] MCPM: clarify boot CPU situation wrt CCI

2014-06-23 Thread Nicolas Pitre
For the background story, please see:

http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/thread=32807

I sat on those patches for a while but they are the best I could think of
in terms of implementation.  To ease merging I suggest I collect all the
ACK's and Tested-by's and submit them all at once to RMK's patch system.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html