Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory leak in case SoC name does not match
On Saturday, August 08, 2015 04:36:34 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: W dniu 06.08.2015 o 09:23, Rafael J. Wysocki pisze: On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:45:16 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: From: Shailendra Verma shailendra.capric...@gmail.com During probe free the memory allocated to exynos_info in case of unknown SoC type. Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma shailendra.capric...@gmail.com Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com [k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kg...@kernel.org --- Hi Rafael and Viresh, Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree. I'm not planning more pull requests for 4.2 and this one doesn't seem to be a good enough reason for a pull request of its own, though. Of course, if there are more urgent fixes, I can push it along with them, but there are none so far. The cpufreq driver will be removed completely in v4.3 or v4.4 with patchset adding cpufreq-dt support for Exynos 4x12. This means that this patch makes sense only for 4.2 and as a stable backport (but it was not marked as such). Since I have one more ACPI fix for 4.2, I've applied this one and will push it to Linus next week. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory leak in case SoC name does not match
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Saturday, August 08, 2015 04:36:34 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: W dniu 06.08.2015 o 09:23, Rafael J. Wysocki pisze: On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:45:16 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: From: Shailendra Verma shailendra.capric...@gmail.com During probe free the memory allocated to exynos_info in case of unknown SoC type. Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma shailendra.capric...@gmail.com Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com [k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kg...@kernel.org --- Hi Rafael and Viresh, Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree. I'm not planning more pull requests for 4.2 and this one doesn't seem to be a good enough reason for a pull request of its own, though. Of course, if there are more urgent fixes, I can push it along with them, but there are none so far. The cpufreq driver will be removed completely in v4.3 or v4.4 with patchset adding cpufreq-dt support for Exynos 4x12. This means that this patch makes sense only for 4.2 and as a stable backport (but it was not marked as such). Since I have one more ACPI fix for 4.2, I've applied this one and will push it to Linus next week. Rafael, thanks. - Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix for memory leak in case SoC name does not match
On Tuesday, August 04, 2015 04:45:16 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: From: Shailendra Verma shailendra.capric...@gmail.com During probe free the memory allocated to exynos_info in case of unknown SoC type. Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma shailendra.capric...@gmail.com Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com [k.kozlowski: Rebased the patch around if(of_machine_is_compatible)] Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski k.kozlow...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim kg...@kernel.org --- Hi Rafael and Viresh, Since this is a fix to prevent memory leak, it would be better if this could be sent to linus during -rc via cpufreq tree. I'm not planning more pull requests for 4.2 and this one doesn't seem to be a good enough reason for a pull request of its own, though. Of course, if there are more urgent fixes, I can push it along with them, but there are none so far. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
