Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ehci-exynos: Make provision for vdd regulators
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Facilitate getting required 3.3V and 1.0V VDD supply for
EHCI controller on Exynos.
With patches for regulators' nodes merged in 3.15:
c8c253f ARM: dts: Add regulator entries to smdk5420
275dcd2 ARM: dts: add max77686 pmic node for smdk5250,
certain perripherals will now need to ensure that,
they request VDD regulators in their drivers, and enable
them so as to make them working.
Certain peripherals? Don't you mean certain controllers?
Right, 'certain controllers'.
Does this mean some controllers don't need to use the VDD regulators?
Actually until the two patches got merged, the USB controllers were
depending on bootloader
for the VDD supply, wherein it was enabled, which ofcourse was bad.
And by 'certain' i meant that above mentioned dt patches enable only the minimum
number of regulators for the system, however leaves other for the
drivers to enable.
Anyways, i will re-do this commit message.
@@ -193,7 +196,31 @@ static int exynos_ehci_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
err = exynos_ehci_get_phy(pdev-dev, exynos_ehci);
if (err)
- goto fail_clk;
+ goto fail_regulator1;
+
+ exynos_ehci-vdd33 = devm_regulator_get(pdev-dev, vdd33);
+ if (!IS_ERR(exynos_ehci-vdd33)) {
+ err = regulator_enable(exynos_ehci-vdd33);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(pdev-dev,
+ Failed to enable 3.3V Vdd supply\n);
+ goto fail_regulator1;
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_warn(pdev-dev, Regulator 3.3V Vdd supply not found\n);
+ }
What if this is one of the controllers that don't need to use a VDD
regulator? Do you really want to print out a warning in that case?
Should you call devm_regulator_get_optional() instead?
Right, better to use devm_regulator_get_optional(). Thanks for
pointing this out.
--
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung RD Institute, Bangalore
India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ehci-exynos: Make provision for vdd regulators
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Facilitate getting required 3.3V and 1.0V VDD supply for
EHCI controller on Exynos.
With patches for regulators' nodes merged in 3.15:
c8c253f ARM: dts: Add regulator entries to smdk5420
275dcd2 ARM: dts: add max77686 pmic node for smdk5250,
certain perripherals will now need to ensure that,
they request VDD regulators in their drivers, and enable
them so as to make them working.
Certain peripherals? Don't you mean certain controllers?
Does this mean some controllers don't need to use the VDD regulators?
@@ -193,7 +196,31 @@ static int exynos_ehci_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
err = exynos_ehci_get_phy(pdev-dev, exynos_ehci);
if (err)
- goto fail_clk;
+ goto fail_regulator1;
+
+ exynos_ehci-vdd33 = devm_regulator_get(pdev-dev, vdd33);
+ if (!IS_ERR(exynos_ehci-vdd33)) {
+ err = regulator_enable(exynos_ehci-vdd33);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(pdev-dev,
+ Failed to enable 3.3V Vdd supply\n);
+ goto fail_regulator1;
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_warn(pdev-dev, Regulator 3.3V Vdd supply not found\n);
+ }
What if this is one of the controllers that don't need to use a VDD
regulator? Do you really want to print out a warning in that case?
Should you call devm_regulator_get_optional() instead?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: ehci-exynos: Make provision for vdd regulators
On Thursday, June 12, 2014 12:39 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Facilitate getting required 3.3V and 1.0V VDD supply for
EHCI controller on Exynos.
With patches for regulators' nodes merged in 3.15:
c8c253f ARM: dts: Add regulator entries to smdk5420
275dcd2 ARM: dts: add max77686 pmic node for smdk5250,
certain perripherals will now need to ensure that,
they request VDD regulators in their drivers, and enable
them so as to make them working.
Certain peripherals? Don't you mean certain controllers?
Does this mean some controllers don't need to use the VDD regulators?
@@ -193,7 +196,31 @@ static int exynos_ehci_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
err = exynos_ehci_get_phy(pdev-dev, exynos_ehci);
if (err)
- goto fail_clk;
+ goto fail_regulator1;
+
+ exynos_ehci-vdd33 = devm_regulator_get(pdev-dev, vdd33);
+ if (!IS_ERR(exynos_ehci-vdd33)) {
+ err = regulator_enable(exynos_ehci-vdd33);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(pdev-dev,
+ Failed to enable 3.3V Vdd supply\n);
+ goto fail_regulator1;
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_warn(pdev-dev, Regulator 3.3V Vdd supply not found\n);
+ }
What if this is one of the controllers that don't need to use a VDD
regulator? Do you really want to print out a warning in that case?
Should you call devm_regulator_get_optional() instead?
I agree with Alan's suggestion. This warning message is not
proper, when USB controllers that don't need a VDD regulator
are used. The devm_regulator_get_optional() looks better.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
