Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: exynos: add exynos5410 SoC specific data
Hi Andreas, On 23.11.2014 07:26, Andreas Färber wrote: From: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com Add Samsung EXYNOS5410 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5410. Signed-off-by: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com [AF: Rebased onto Exynos5260 and irq_chip consolidation] Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de --- v2 - v3: * Rebased (.svc, .{g,w}eint_{con,mask,pend} fields dropped) v1 - v2: * Filled in Sob from Hakjoo Kim Any news on this patch? I'd like to ACK it, but apparently it is waiting for a rebase. Sorry for the delay, unfortunately things are a little bit busy on my side nowadays. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: exynos: add exynos5410 SoC specific data
Hi Andreas, 2014-11-28 21:07 GMT+09:00 Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de: Am 28.11.2014 um 12:59 schrieb Linus Walleij: On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: From: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com Add Samsung EXYNOS5410 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5410. Signed-off-by: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com [AF: Rebased onto Exynos5260 and irq_chip consolidation] Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de --- v2 - v3: * Rebased (.svc, .{g,w}eint_{con,mask,pend} fields dropped) v1 - v2: * Filled in Sob from Hakjoo Kim Is this based on the pinctrl devel branch so I can apply it? It was based on the Samsung for-next tree. I can rebase if needed. Yes, please rebase (and please make sure that all the structs are const, which became possible after recent changes). Otherwise the patch looks good. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: exynos: add exynos5410 SoC specific data
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: From: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com Add Samsung EXYNOS5410 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5410. Signed-off-by: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com [AF: Rebased onto Exynos5260 and irq_chip consolidation] Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de --- v2 - v3: * Rebased (.svc, .{g,w}eint_{con,mask,pend} fields dropped) v1 - v2: * Filled in Sob from Hakjoo Kim Is this based on the pinctrl devel branch so I can apply it? I'd like Tomasz ACK on it first though. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] pinctrl: exynos: add exynos5410 SoC specific data
Am 28.11.2014 um 12:59 schrieb Linus Walleij: On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote: From: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com Add Samsung EXYNOS5410 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5410. Signed-off-by: Hakjoo Kim ruppi@hardkernel.com [AF: Rebased onto Exynos5260 and irq_chip consolidation] Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de --- v2 - v3: * Rebased (.svc, .{g,w}eint_{con,mask,pend} fields dropped) v1 - v2: * Filled in Sob from Hakjoo Kim Is this based on the pinctrl devel branch so I can apply it? It was based on the Samsung for-next tree. I can rebase if needed. I'd like Tomasz ACK on it first though. Thanks, Andreas -- SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 21284 AG Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html