Since the CSI controller binding is getting a bit more complex due
to the addition of MIPI CSI-2 bridge support, make the ports node
explicit with the parallel port.
This way, it's clear that the controller only supports parallel
interface input and there's no confusion about the port number.
Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkow...@bootlin.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v3s.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v3s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v3s.dtsi
index 7b2d684aeb97..7926c8b2ac5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v3s.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v3s.dtsi
@@ -540,6 +540,15 @@ csi1: camera@1cb4000 {
clock-names = "bus", "mod", "ram";
resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_CSI>;
status = "disabled";
+
+ ports {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ csi1_in_parallel: port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+ };
+ };
};
gic: interrupt-controller@1c81000 {
--
2.29.2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20201128142839.517949-11-paul.kocialkowski%40bootlin.com.
