On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > The current function name is a bit confusing, and doesn't really allow to > create an explicit function to reverse the operation. > > We also for now change the parent rate through a pointer, while we don't > return anything. > > In order to be less confusing, and easier to use for downstream users, > change the function name to something hopefully clearer, and return the > adjusted rate instead of changing the pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
