Samsung printers support Linux out of the box

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Fakaro
My old OKI printer finally died and I went looking for a new one and
found a Samsung ML1750 c/w Linux drivers in the box.

Brought it home and it was printing great in 5 minutes drivers installed
no problem.

I just felt it was important to mention because of Samsungs support of
Linux. I know many printers run under Linux but at least these guys go
the extra step, this is a really nice printer and I'm very pleased to be
able to support a Linux friendly printer manufacturer.

Now I just have to register it so they know my main reason for
purchasing it!

Regards

Mike F

-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users


Re: Weird boot problem??

2003-02-10 Thread Michael Fakaro
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 07:13, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, David A. Bandel wrote:

> 
> > with his XFS chant.  But you definitely want to move you system to XFS
> > at the first opportunity.  Check the steps and consider moving. XFS will
> > be included in the 2.6 kernel when it comes out.  Move to XFS and say
> > goodbye to fsck forever.
> 
> I agree 100%.  I think either you are starting to see a subtle hardware
> problem, or you hit one of the many ext2/3 bugs out there.
> 

One of the reasons I moved to Red Hat 8 was to use ext3 because it was
journaled, it was my belief this would substantially reduce my chances
of corruption, my Caldera 3.1.1 is ext2 but it sure saved my butt.

What your saying is that move to ext3 is still leaving me open to
corruption for no reason. That being the case it should be a no brainer
to go to XFS.

But is XFS ready for prime time?? or should I wait to make any big
changes till kernel 2.6.

I am not that adept at the mechanics of Linux yet, but love using it and
wouldn't switch for anything. So am I better off waiting till say Red
Hat 8.1 or whatever that will make these changes for me.

Sorry about being long winded, I just don't want to get myself in a
position where I destroy my system will ill timed changes I may not have
the technical abilities to perform.

Thanks

Mike F

-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Weird boot problem??

2003-02-09 Thread Michael Fakaro
My kids wanted to play some games so I shutdown, booted into windows and
then when they were finished booted back to Red Hat 8. When it got to 
checking root it said it had errors and forced a check. I did shutdown 
properly so I don't know how any errors were present. Anyway it checked
to 
57.5 % then locked up, I tried it several times and had to power off to 
reboot each time. So I tried to boot from my rescue floppy that wouldn't
boot!! then panic set in. I then booted into Caldera 3.1.1 and ran fsck 
from there on my Red Hat root partition, I know that was probably crazy
but 
I didn't know what else to do. Anyway it got through with 2 error on
pass 1 
then finished and now I'm back happily in Red Hat. Any comments on what 
happened and how I could avoid this near catastrophe (if it was one) in
the 
future. 

Your comments are quite welcome, I'm in the dark.

Thanks

Mike F
-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: mozilla 1.2.1

2002-12-10 Thread Michael Fakaro
Go to:

edit

preferences

advanced/scripts & plugins

Uncheck "Open unrequested windows" box

Regards

Mike F



On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 09:59, Collins wrote:
> I'm thinking mozilla 1.2.1 is the best browser I've ever used, but how
> can I disable popups?  I've scanned all the preference options a dozen
> times, and I just don't see it.
-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: new Flash player available

2002-11-27 Thread Michael Fakaro
After upgrading!! never did get it to work before. 

With the new files NO PROBLEM!!

Regards

Mike


On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 16:50, Net Llama! wrote:
> After upgrading, or just in general??
> 
> On 11/27/02 16:04, Michael Fakaro wrote:
> > Thanks for the heads up. flash finally works as a user and not just
> > as root.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Mike F
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:13, Net Llama! wrote:
> > 
> >>http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: new Flash player available

2002-11-27 Thread Michael Fakaro
Thanks for the heads up. flash finally works as a user and not just
as root.

Regards

Mike F


On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 13:13, Net Llama! wrote:
> http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashplayer/special/beta/
-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Flash Player

2002-11-16 Thread Michael Fakaro
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 14:40, Net Llama! wrote:

> 
> no, not really.  i think redhat did something snarfy to their Mozilla.

Well I think your right!! another fellow from a Red Hat Newsgroup has
the same problem after he updated his kernel. His Mozilla will only play
as "root" now to, mine will sometimes load slow as I said but has since
refused to load at all.

Gotta check the Mozilla site, 

Thanks

Mike F

-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Flash Player

2002-11-16 Thread Michael Fakaro
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 23:01, Net Llama! wrote:

> > 
> >>Which sites have you tried?
> > 
> > 
> > www.stars-stripes.com is the one I'm at every day now
> > 

Well this morning I booted up started Mozilla and it froze
at the above page again, then my young son called me and I
went to help him when I got back the page had LOADED!!

So I tried again and sure enough if I wait a couple of minutes
it WILL LOAD. Booted back to "root" and it loads immediately, back
to user and it takes a couple of minutes. WEIRD

I have no idea why flash would work well at root and ssslllooowww as
a user, any thoughts??

Thanks

Mike F

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Flash Player

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fakaro
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 23:01, Net Llama! wrote:
> Where did you get the version of Mozilla that you're running?  If not 
> from ftp.mozilla.org, perhaps you should try theirs.  Who knows what 
> redhat might have done.

It is from Red Hat, I'll try the Mozilla one and get back to you with the results,

Thanks again

Mike F
> 

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Flash Player

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fakaro
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 22:38, Net Llama! wrote:

> 
> That's the version that i've been using for months without a problem.
> 

Wish I could say the same

> > 

> 
> Which sites have you tried?

www.stars-stripes.com is the one I'm at every day now

> 
> > 
> > 
> >> Are you sure that mozilla is actually 

> Do you mean 'killall mozilla-bin'?  'kill mozilla-bin' is incorrect 
> syntax and won't kill anything.  Either way, did you look at the process 
> list and verify that its no longer running?

Yes according to the list it's no longer running, I actually kill it
from the list using the system monitor

> 
> Are you running mozilla from the command line?  Is it spitting out errors?

No but when I do the cursor just goes back to the prompt after I kill
it,and it only says "killed"
-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: Flash Player

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fakaro

> Upgraded from what? 

The exact version was 5.01 r48, came with RH8 
>  Was a new version of flash released recently? 

The version I downloaded today from Macromedia was 5.01 r50

I was hoping it might run a website my kids like to go to play games

>  And 
> what do you mean by 'crashes'? 

It just stops dead, freezes before the page will load

>  Are you sure that mozilla is actually 
> cleanly terminating, 

No it isn't, to get it to run again I have to manually kill mozilla-bin

> and not leaving any processes behind?  If its 
> running as root, and not as a normal user, then that's got to be 
> something permissions related.

I tried switching permissions of the 2 flash files all around and
nothing changed

Thanks for the suggestion though.

Regards

Mike
-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Flash Player

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fakaro
Flash was working fine until I upgraded it tonight. (Why do I insist on 
fixing things that aren't broken?) Now it crashes everytime I go to 
www.stars-stripes.com (or any other flash site). So I deleted it, took
the original files of my spare computer and it still crashes. I wiped
out every remnant of flash on my system copied the old files into
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and it still crashes. So I booted into "root"
and voila it runs, back into a user acount and it crashes, log into a
terminal and "su" and run mozilla it crashes. It's been 2 long hours now
and a lot less hair any Ideas would be great.

Red Hat 8, Mozilla 1.0.1

Thanks

Mike F
-- 
Michael Fakaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



Re: PCMCIA mount?

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Fakaro
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 16:47, Net Llama! wrote:

> Because your syntax is incorrect.  /dev/hde1 is the device, not the 
> mount point.  You want something like:
> mount /mnt/pcmcia
> 

DUH!! sorry about that, yes I type "mount /mnt/pcmcia"
and it just sits there till I close the terminal. (If I hit enter the
cursor just moves down a line)

Sometimes I forget to put my mind in gear before I put my hands in
motion!!

Mike

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users



PCMCIA mount?

2002-11-10 Thread Michael Fakaro


Red Hat 8 recognizes my ISA PCMCIA card reader and if I go to the PCMCIA
panel in the Control Center it shows that the card is in and recognized.

So how do I mount it??

In my last distro

I added this line to fstab:

"/dev/hde1 /mnt/pcmcia  vfatro,defaults 0 0"

which I have done, then I would mount it by:

"mount /dev/hde1"

after I hit enter the cursor goes to the next line with no error and
just 
sits there.. I have to close the terminal to end it.

Any suggestions would be appreciated

Thanks

Mike

___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users