Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
On Saturday 07 December 2002 03:04 am, Joel Hammer espoused: I want to burn CD's that can be used by non-linux OS's (win95/98/2000/XP). I only have win98 available with which to fool. I burned a CD with the Rock Ridge scheme (mkisofs -r), and that worked fine for linux but the win98 machine shows only the 8.3 names. (If I put the CD into the linux box, and share it with samba, the win98 machine sees the full name.) So, it seems I may need the Joliet naming convention, at least for my version of windows98. Will using the Joliet scheme cause difficulties with other flavors of windows or with linux? Thanks, Joel Do not forget thet you will have to reconfig the kernel if its not already selected, Joliet that is. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
RR Joliet are both supported via the kernel in linux. So, as long as you have kernel support (and most do from the distro vendors) you should be fine. I can't comment on windoze, i don't use it. On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joel Hammer wrote: I want to burn CD's that can be used by non-linux OS's (win95/98/2000/XP). I only have win98 available with which to fool. I burned a CD with the Rock Ridge scheme (mkisofs -r), and that worked fine for linux but the win98 machine shows only the 8.3 names. (If I put the CD into the linux box, and share it with samba, the win98 machine sees the full name.) So, it seems I may need the Joliet naming convention, at least for my version of windows98. Will using the Joliet scheme cause difficulties with other flavors of windows or with linux? Thanks, Joel ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
Thanks. mkisofs -J worked just as advertised, at least on windows98. I haven't been using this software long (cdrecord, mkisofs), but, it's really a pleasure to have a command line to burn CD's. Point and click stuff is just too aggravating. Does xcdroast offer any advantages? Joel Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:52:57PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote: RR Joliet are both supported via the kernel in linux. So, as long as you have kernel support (and most do from the distro vendors) you should be fine. I can't comment on windoze, i don't use it. On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joel Hammer wrote: I want to burn CD's that can be used by non-linux OS's (win95/98/2000/XP). I only have win98 available with which to fool. I burned a CD with the Rock Ridge scheme (mkisofs -r), and that worked fine for linux but the win98 machine shows only the 8.3 names. (If I put the CD into the linux box, and share it with samba, the win98 machine sees the full name.) So, it seems I may need the Joliet naming convention, at least for my version of windows98. Will using the Joliet scheme cause difficulties with other flavors of windows or with linux? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
I don't use xcdroast, i wouldn't know. gcombust is my preferred GUI cd-burning tool. On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joel Hammer wrote: Thanks. mkisofs -J worked just as advertised, at least on windows98. I haven't been using this software long (cdrecord, mkisofs), but, it's really a pleasure to have a command line to burn CD's. Point and click stuff is just too aggravating. Does xcdroast offer any advantages? Joel Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:52:57PM -0500, Net Llama! wrote: RR Joliet are both supported via the kernel in linux. So, as long as you have kernel support (and most do from the distro vendors) you should be fine. I can't comment on windoze, i don't use it. On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joel Hammer wrote: I want to burn CD's that can be used by non-linux OS's (win95/98/2000/XP). I only have win98 available with which to fool. I burned a CD with the Rock Ridge scheme (mkisofs -r), and that worked fine for linux but the win98 machine shows only the 8.3 names. (If I put the CD into the linux box, and share it with samba, the win98 machine sees the full name.) So, it seems I may need the Joliet naming convention, at least for my version of windows98. Will using the Joliet scheme cause difficulties with other flavors of windows or with linux? ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users -- ~~ Lonni J Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
I don't use xcdroast either (it's a POS, IMO), arson is my preferred CD burning GUI, but it's primarily audio focused and only recently offered data burning. I've used, and liked, cdbakeoven for data burning. Both are kde-based apps (arson is more qt-based than kde). Regards, Tim On 12/6/2002 3:10 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: I don't use xcdroast, i wouldn't know. gcombust is my preferred GUI cd-burning tool. On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Joel Hammer wrote: Thanks. mkisofs -J worked just as advertised, at least on windows98. I haven't been using this software long (cdrecord, mkisofs), but, it's really a pleasure to have a command line to burn CD's. Point and click stuff is just too aggravating. Does xcdroast offer any advantages? snip ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
ISO9660 is DOS 8.3 and 8 levels deep, requires CAPS.EXT ISO9660+joliet is the above with the 8 level restriction gone and support for long names, no caps. good for all win versions On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:04:17 -0500 - Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes I want to burn CD's that can be used by non-linux OS's (win95/98/2000/XP). I only have win98 available with which to fool. I burned a CD with the Rock Ridge scheme (mkisofs -r), and that worked fine for linux but the win98 machine shows only the 8.3 names. (If I put the CD into the linux box, and share it with samba, the win98 machine sees the full name.) So, it seems I may need the Joliet naming convention, at least for my version of windows98. Will using the Joliet scheme cause difficulties with other flavors of windows or with linux? Thanks, Joel ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
Joel Hammer wrote: Thanks. mkisofs -J worked just as advertised, at least on windows98. I haven't been using this software long (cdrecord, mkisofs), but, it's really a pleasure to have a command line to burn CD's. Point and click stuff is just too aggravating. Does xcdroast offer any advantages? Joel It's appreciated by those of us who can't type long lines of arcane commands error-free. I like XCDRoast. I just burned a 623 MB data back-up CD with a couple of clicks. -- Leon A. Goldstein Powered by Caldera Linux 2.4 System 5WV271 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: Joliet and Rock Ridge naming schemes
I do very little typing on the command line when entering commands like this. Cut and paste and the history function do most of my typing. Joel Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:22:04PM -0500, Leon A. Goldstein wrote: Joel Hammer wrote: Thanks. mkisofs -J worked just as advertised, at least on windows98. I haven't been using this software long (cdrecord, mkisofs), but, it's really a pleasure to have a command line to burn CD's. Point and click stuff is just too aggravating. Does xcdroast offer any advantages? Joel It's appreciated by those of us who can't type long lines of arcane commands error-free. I like XCDRoast. I just burned a 623 MB data back-up CD with a couple of clicks. -- Leon A. Goldstein Powered by Caldera Linux 2.4 System 5WV271 ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
