Re: [Linux-users] Can linux boot even when windows can not?
On 18 February 2016 at 10:38, Volker Kuhlmannwrote: > > Awkward!! Don't borrow RAM, only swap around what you have. Memory > faults can be awkward to find, especially when they're sporadic. It was more a question of a fast fault find. In the event that the problem was *not* your specific dimms messing you up and it was some problem with the motherboard not working under certain load patterns with that exact amount of memory, or your OS drawing a certain voltage with that many dimms installed that caused problems due to a bad powersupply... the idea was _if_ you could replicate the situation identically with an entirely different set of ram, then you know the problem is not the ram. Similarly, if you can replicate the problem with a different powersupply, its not the power supply. ( And you'd be amazed how many weird problems can appear from weak powersupplies ) I'd also consider ripping out the hard drive and booting it in an entirely different machine just to see if windows fails at the same points in the same ways or not. And it could very well be that its not "windows", just some way windows utilizes hardware makes the problem appear faster than it does with Linux. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [Linux-users] Can linux boot even when windows can not?
On Wed 17 Feb 2016 21:44:03 NZDT +1300, Peter Simmonds wrote: > drive and kept going as it was! Booting is not an exception really, > it has far better programming to enable it to recover from what may > be slightly mashed up partitioning. Keep in mind that BillyFS(TM) was designed with the braindead idea of storing the start position of the filesystem relative to the start of the disk(!!!) in the filesystem header. If you dd the partition to a new disk with a partition later on, because you enlarged the previous partition, Billy no longer knows about it... I have once successfuly injected new doctored bytes with dd, but it's not worth the trouble. Just tell the boss you need to buy a new doze box, preinstalled... In answer to $SUBJECT, yes, in numerous ways, but I'm not sure they apply in the case here. Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann http://volker.top.geek.nz/ Please do not CC list postings to me. ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [Linux-users] Can linux boot even when windows can not?
On 17 February 2016 at 22:18,wrote: > I doubt it is the hard drives as boots fine 7 and 10 if I just use 2x2 gigs > ram in same slots, Did you try swapping the order of your ram cards? That can alleviate certain kinds of "Loaded into fixed address that happened to be broken" problems. And see if you can borrow some friends ram of the same size and try it independently. -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [Linux-users] Can linux boot even when windows can not?
I doubt it is the hard drives as boots fine 7 and 10 if I just use 2x2 gigs ram in same slots, I suspect the computer repair store will blame the hard drive configuration as I admit not ideal as 250g ssd drive with boot and windows 7 C partition, with I partition pointing to partition on 3tb drive (GPT formatted) and windows 10 on another 4tb hard drive formatted mbr so only able to use first 2tb. I am waiting until I need to replace motherboard and cpu before bothering fixing up harddrives as motherboard won't boot from gpt formatting. Done some stress testing on Linux boot and once I got towards 4tb appeared to have issues with window manager as looked like it crashed, so I am guessing problem is either motherboard or ram. On 17.02.2016 21:44, Peter Simmonds wrote: > Hi All, > > How did you actually go about moving windows to the new drive, and if > win 7 or later, did you copy both partitions? If you don't mind, what > did you use to copy these partitions? > > In the past I have successfully used Clonezilla and Redo Backup to copy > windows partitions and keep them working. Both of these are linux live > CD's which you boot from. > > Regarding booting I can only give general advice; Linux is much more > fault tolerant than windows, in other words, when anything minor goes > wrong with windows it simply crashes. With linux, I have actually > plugged in a CDrom with the system on, hard drive spun down then spun up > (crashed) and linux simply sent a reset command to the drive and kept > going as it was! Booting is not an exception really, it has far better > programming to enable it to recover from what may be slightly mashed up > partitioning. > > Hope This helps! > > Peter > > On 17/02/2016 19:55, dave wrote: > >> Me thinks that it's the header info that can be seen when responder asks the question about safebooting in windows. that's about all i can think of. dave On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:03:02 Kent Fredric wrote: >> >>> On 17 February 2016 at 12:13, Barrywrote: >>> Please do not hijack an unrelated thread, start a new one. >>> Care to explain which thread was hijacked? All the context I have is: - Person wonders why linux can boot and windows cannot - Second person asks first person if windows safemode boots And that seems entirely reasonable to me. ( Though perhaps different mail clients format it differently, I'm using GMail ) >> ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users [1] > > ___ > Linux-users mailing list > Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz > http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users [1] Links: -- [1] http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [Linux-users] Can linux boot even when windows can not?
Peter I think you missed the point of the first post. It was the RAM which was upgraded not the hard drives. Robert Fisher On 17 Feb 2016 9:44 p.m., "Peter Simmonds"wrote: > Hi All, > > How did you actually go about moving windows to the new drive, and if win > 7 or later, did you copy both partitions? If you don't mind, what did you > use to copy these partitions? > > In the past I have successfully used Clonezilla and Redo Backup to copy > windows partitions and keep them working. Both of these are linux live CD's > which you boot from. > > Regarding booting I can only give general advice; Linux is much more fault > tolerant than windows, in other words, when anything minor goes wrong with > windows it simply crashes. With linux, I have actually plugged in a CDrom > with the system on, hard drive spun down then spun up (crashed) and linux > simply sent a reset command to the drive and kept going as it was! Booting > is not an exception really, it has far better programming to enable it to > recover from what may be slightly mashed up partitioning. > > Hope This helps! > > Peter > > On 17/02/2016 19:55, dave wrote: > >> Me thinks that it's the header info that can be seen when responder asks >> the >> question about safebooting in windows. >> >> that's about all i can think of. >> >> dave >> >> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:03:02 Kent Fredric wrote: >> >>> On 17 February 2016 at 12:13, Barry wrote: >>> Please do not hijack an unrelated thread, start a new one. >>> Care to explain which thread was hijacked? >>> >>> All the context I have is: >>> >>> - Person wonders why linux can boot and windows cannot >>> - Second person asks first person if windows safemode boots >>> >>> And that seems entirely reasonable to me. ( Though perhaps different >>> mail clients format it differently, I'm using GMail ) >>> >> ___ >> Linux-users mailing list >> Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz >> http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users >> >> > ___ > Linux-users mailing list > Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz > http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Re: [Linux-users] Can linux boot even when windows can not?
Hi All, How did you actually go about moving windows to the new drive, and if win 7 or later, did you copy both partitions? If you don't mind, what did you use to copy these partitions? In the past I have successfully used Clonezilla and Redo Backup to copy windows partitions and keep them working. Both of these are linux live CD's which you boot from. Regarding booting I can only give general advice; Linux is much more fault tolerant than windows, in other words, when anything minor goes wrong with windows it simply crashes. With linux, I have actually plugged in a CDrom with the system on, hard drive spun down then spun up (crashed) and linux simply sent a reset command to the drive and kept going as it was! Booting is not an exception really, it has far better programming to enable it to recover from what may be slightly mashed up partitioning. Hope This helps! Peter On 17/02/2016 19:55, dave wrote: Me thinks that it's the header info that can be seen when responder asks the question about safebooting in windows. that's about all i can think of. dave On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:03:02 Kent Fredric wrote: On 17 February 2016 at 12:13, Barrywrote: Please do not hijack an unrelated thread, start a new one. Care to explain which thread was hijacked? All the context I have is: - Person wonders why linux can boot and windows cannot - Second person asks first person if windows safemode boots And that seems entirely reasonable to me. ( Though perhaps different mail clients format it differently, I'm using GMail ) ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users ___ Linux-users mailing list Linux-users@lists.canterbury.ac.nz http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users