On 8/3/2017 9:08 PM, Maya Erez wrote:
From: Hamad Kadmany
Validate buffer length has the minimum needed size
when sending management frame to protect against
possible buffer overrun.
I noticed this is already applied, but I saw this subject text which has
similar sound to a recent patch in our driver so I it made me curious...
Signed-off-by: Hamad Kadmany
Signed-off-by: Lior David
Signed-off-by: Maya Erez
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c | 3 +++
drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
index 0b5383a..77af749 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/cfg80211.c
@@ -884,6 +884,9 @@ int wil_cfg80211_mgmt_tx(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct
wireless_dev *wdev,
wil_hex_dump_misc("mgmt tx frame ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, buf,
len, true);
+ if (len < sizeof(struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr))
+ return -EINVAL;
A similar check is already in net/wireless/cfg80211_mlme_mgmt_tx() which
calls this function:
if (params->len < 24 + 1)
return -EINVAL;
So it only makes sense if this is called from some other call site
cmd = kmalloc(sizeof(*cmd) + len, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cmd) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
index f82506d..a2b5d59 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
@@ -801,6 +801,9 @@ static ssize_t wil_write_file_txmgmt(struct file *file,
const char __user *buf,
int rc;
void *frame;
+ if (!len)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
... which is in this function. Now I wonder why you would need this
method in the first place. Why not stick with using the nl80211
NL80211_CMD_FRAME api?
Regards,
Arend
frame = memdup_user(buf, len);
if (IS_ERR(frame))
return PTR_ERR(frame);