Re: [v3 PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects
From: Johannes BergDate: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:32:12 +0200 > On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 13:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 18:58 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: >> > >> > v3 fixes a bug in the remove path that causes the element count >> > to decrease when it shouldn't, leading to a gigantic hash table >> > when it underflows. >> > >> Ok, with the BUG_ON() thrown in, this works in the test that was >> failing before. I'll run the entire suite again over lunch. >> > > Ok, the entire test suite passed (with the BUG_ON, but hey). > > Dave, let me know what you want to do (or have done, as it may be). I'll apply this directly to net-next and push it out after some build testing. Thanks guys.
Re: [v3 PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 13:03 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 18:58 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > v3 fixes a bug in the remove path that causes the element count > > to decrease when it shouldn't, leading to a gigantic hash table > > when it underflows. > > > Ok, with the BUG_ON() thrown in, this works in the test that was > failing before. I'll run the entire suite again over lunch. > Ok, the entire test suite passed (with the BUG_ON, but hey). Dave, let me know what you want to do (or have done, as it may be). Thanks, johannes
Re: [v3 PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 18:58 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > v3 fixes a bug in the remove path that causes the element count > to decrease when it shouldn't, leading to a gigantic hash table > when it underflows. > Ok, with the BUG_ON() thrown in, this works in the test that was failing before. I'll run the entire suite again over lunch. johannes
[v3 PATCH 0/2] rhashtable: rhashtable with duplicate objects
v3 fixes a bug in the remove path that causes the element count to decrease when it shouldn't, leading to a gigantic hash table when it underflows. v2 contains a reworked insertion slowpath to ensure that the spinlock for the table we're inserting into is taken. This series contains two patches. The first adds the rhlist interface and the second converts mac80211 to use it. If this works out I'll then proceed to convert the other insecure_elasticity users over to this. I've tested the rhlist code with test_rhashtable but I haven't tested the mac80211 conversion. So please give it a go and see if it still works. Thanks! -- Email: Herbert XuHome Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt