From: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> commit d73dad4eb5ad8c31ac9cf358eb5a55825bafe706 upstream.
Intentional overflows, as performed by the KASAN tests, are detected at compile time[1] (instead of only at run-time) with the addition of __alloc_size. Fix this by forcing the compiler into not being able to trust the size used following the kmalloc()s. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211005184717.65c6d8eb39350395e387b...@linux-foundation.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211006181544.1670992-1-keesc...@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin....@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <gli...@google.com> Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyk...@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortma...@windriver.com> --- lib/test_kasan.c | 8 +++++++- lib/test_kasan_module.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c index aa8e42250219..5475fe396ff7 100644 --- a/lib/test_kasan.c +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_2(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 1, 0, 2)); kfree(ptr); } @@ -452,6 +453,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_4(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 3, 0, 4)); kfree(ptr); } @@ -464,6 +466,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_8(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 7, 0, 8)); kfree(ptr); } @@ -476,6 +479,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_memset_16(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr + size - 15, 0, 16)); kfree(ptr); } @@ -488,6 +492,7 @@ static void kmalloc_oob_in_memset(struct kunit *test) ptr = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memset(ptr, 0, size + KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE)); kfree(ptr); @@ -497,7 +502,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_negative_size(struct kunit *test) { char *ptr; size_t size = 64; - volatile size_t invalid_size = -2; + size_t invalid_size = -2; /* * Hardware tag-based mode doesn't check memmove for negative size. @@ -510,6 +515,7 @@ static void kmalloc_memmove_negative_size(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ptr); memset((char *)ptr, 0, 64); + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(invalid_size); KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, memmove((char *)ptr, (char *)ptr + 4, invalid_size)); kfree(ptr); diff --git a/lib/test_kasan_module.c b/lib/test_kasan_module.c index 7ebf433edef3..b112cbc835e9 100644 --- a/lib/test_kasan_module.c +++ b/lib/test_kasan_module.c @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ static noinline void __init copy_user_test(void) return; } + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(size); + pr_info("out-of-bounds in copy_from_user()\n"); unused = copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, size + 1); -- 2.17.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11153): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/message/11153 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/90342151/21656 Group Owner: linux-yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/linux-yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
