Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 14-02-11 01:01 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 21:45, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/11/2014, 12:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 21:23, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/10/2014, 11:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 16:21, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update. Could it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up behind this and people clawing at me for it :-) Ack'd. I can do that, I like to keep them in sync, but I'm willing to bend that rule to keep things moving. I'll have this merged during the day tomorrow. Thank you kindly. On that same note, I went ahead and merged this to -dev, it is now in the linux-yocto-dev repository. I had a reject for 3.10 on the first patch of the series (we've already done some eg20t work). It wasn't hard to resolve, but can you confirm that you do want this on 3.10 as well as -dev, before I got ahead and push that change. Bruce As you have expressed an interest in keeping them in sync, please resolve the conflict with minnow.scc by adding the eg20t include line. This won't hurt anything as any differences between eg20t.cfg and minnow.cfg will defer to minnow.cfg as it comes later. 3.10 is still a bit different from the master (-dev) kernel, but I did a few fixups and it looks sane (enough). Incremental patches to what I just pushed to 3.10's meta branch are welcomed to fix anything I did wrong. Bruce As I update minnow, we can remove the redundancy later. -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 2/11/14, 7:45, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 14-02-11 01:01 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 21:45, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/11/2014, 12:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 21:23, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/10/2014, 11:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 16:21, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update. Could it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up behind this and people clawing at me for it :-) Ack'd. I can do that, I like to keep them in sync, but I'm willing to bend that rule to keep things moving. I'll have this merged during the day tomorrow. Thank you kindly. On that same note, I went ahead and merged this to -dev, it is now in the linux-yocto-dev repository. I had a reject for 3.10 on the first patch of the series (we've already done some eg20t work). It wasn't hard to resolve, but can you confirm that you do want this on 3.10 as well as -dev, before I got ahead and push that change. Bruce As you have expressed an interest in keeping them in sync, please resolve the conflict with minnow.scc by adding the eg20t include line. This won't hurt anything as any differences between eg20t.cfg and minnow.cfg will defer to minnow.cfg as it comes later. 3.10 is still a bit different from the master (-dev) kernel, but I did a few fixups and it looks sane (enough). Incremental patches to what I just pushed to 3.10's meta branch are welcomed to fix anything I did wrong. Thanks Bruce. I see the changes in 3.10, but I am not seeing the linux-yocto-dev meta changes: $ git pull origin meta From git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-dev * branchmeta - FETCH_HEAD Already up-to-date. $ git l 0580cff checkpoint dir: meta 469420b checkpoint dir: meta/scripts 180ec63 checkpoint dir: meta/patches d89dd7d checkpoint dir: meta/cfg/scratch 071c446 checkpoint dir: m -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. Bruce -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto -- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 2/10/14, 16:21, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update. Could it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up behind this and people clawing at me for it :-) Sorry to be a nag. -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 2/10/2014, 11:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 16:21, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update. Could it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up behind this and people clawing at me for it :-) Ack'd. I can do that, I like to keep them in sync, but I'm willing to bend that rule to keep things moving. I'll have this merged during the day tomorrow. Bruce Sorry to be a nag. -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 2/10/14, 21:23, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/10/2014, 11:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 16:21, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update. Could it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up behind this and people clawing at me for it :-) Ack'd. I can do that, I like to keep them in sync, but I'm willing to bend that rule to keep things moving. I'll have this merged during the day tomorrow. Thank you kindly. -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 2/11/2014, 12:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 21:23, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/10/2014, 11:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 16:21, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update. Could it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up behind this and people clawing at me for it :-) Ack'd. I can do that, I like to keep them in sync, but I'm willing to bend that rule to keep things moving. I'll have this merged during the day tomorrow. Thank you kindly. On that same note, I went ahead and merged this to -dev, it is now in the linux-yocto-dev repository. I had a reject for 3.10 on the first patch of the series (we've already done some eg20t work). It wasn't hard to resolve, but can you confirm that you do want this on 3.10 as well as -dev, before I got ahead and push that change. Bruce -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH v2 0/4] Cleanup eg20t, 8250, add intel-common BSPs
On 2/10/14, 21:45, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/11/2014, 12:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 21:23, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: On 2/10/2014, 11:59 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 2/10/14, 16:21, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/6/14, 17:18, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: This series does some fragment cleanup and adds the two new common BSPs for the meta-intel layer: intel-core2-32 and intel-corei7-64. These BSPs currently include all the corresponding ARCH (32 or 64) BSP descriptions as well as common-pc to build two kernels capable of supporting all these machines. v2: - Generic to specific ordering in scc files - Use driver fragments from common-pc*, not the entire scc - Update both machines to use CONFIG_MCORE2 Hi Bruce, any pending concerns on this series? Nope. I just didn't want to merge it yet, since I have three other pending updates to the 3.10 kernel that I was waiting on in the meantime. LTSI being the biggest that I want to see merged before piling more on top. This is for -dev first and can go into 3.10 after the LTSI update. Could it go into -dev now? I've got some meta-intel stuff that's queued up behind this and people clawing at me for it :-) Ack'd. I can do that, I like to keep them in sync, but I'm willing to bend that rule to keep things moving. I'll have this merged during the day tomorrow. Thank you kindly. On that same note, I went ahead and merged this to -dev, it is now in the linux-yocto-dev repository. I had a reject for 3.10 on the first patch of the series (we've already done some eg20t work). It wasn't hard to resolve, but can you confirm that you do want this on 3.10 as well as -dev, before I got ahead and push that change. Bruce As you have expressed an interest in keeping them in sync, please resolve the conflict with minnow.scc by adding the eg20t include line. This won't hurt anything as any differences between eg20t.cfg and minnow.cfg will defer to minnow.cfg as it comes later. As I update minnow, we can remove the redundancy later. -- Darren ___ linux-yocto mailing list linux-yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
