Re: [PATCH 1/2, pci] pci: Addition of PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN attribute to the PCI subsystem

2018-03-14 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

On 03/14/2018 03:55 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:


As far as I'm concerned, we can just remove these messages completely.
I don't think there's any real value there.


After I found out that this was happening to all PCI devices on powerpc due
to the __weak
pcibios_default_alignment() interface (necessary for VFIO passthrough and
performance), I confess that this was my first approach to this matter;
however I couldn't vouch the need of these messages on other architectures.

If there are no further concerns, I definitely prefer sending a second
version of this patch only eliminating these messages and attesting the
reason why.

Thank you very much for your review Bjorn,


No problem, welcome to PCI, and I hope we see more of your work!


Bjorn,

Awesome! A second version of this fix has been sent with a new title: 
"[PATCH, pci, v2] pci: Delete PCI disabling informational messages"


Thanks for the review and warm welcome!

--
Desnes A. Nunes do Rosário
--



Re: [PATCH 1/2, pci] pci: Addition of PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN attribute to the PCI subsystem

2018-03-14 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

Hello Bjorn,

On 03/14/2018 03:06 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:34:54PM -0300, Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario wrote:

Add PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN to pci_dev_flags and use it to
silent PCI realignment messages if the flag is turned on by a driver.

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario 
---
  drivers/pci/pci.c   | 3 ++-
  drivers/pci/setup-res.c | 3 ++-
  include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index 8c71d1a66cdd..be197c944e5f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -5505,7 +5505,8 @@ void pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev 
*dev)
return;
}
  
-	pci_info(dev, "Disabling memory decoding and releasing memory resources\n");

+   if (!(dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN))
+   pci_info(dev, "Disabling memory decoding and releasing memory 
resources\n");
pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, );
command &= ~PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY;
pci_write_config_word(dev, PCI_COMMAND, command);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
index 369d48d6c6f1..00a538def763 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
@@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_claim_resource);
  
  void pci_disable_bridge_window(struct pci_dev *dev)

  {
-   pci_info(dev, "disabling bridge mem windows\n");
+   if (!(dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN))
+   pci_info(dev, "disabling bridge mem windows\n");


As far as I'm concerned, we can just remove these messages completely.
I don't think there's any real value there.


After I found out that this was happening to all PCI devices on powerpc 
due to the __weak
pcibios_default_alignment() interface (necessary for VFIO passthrough 
and performance), I confess that this was my first approach to this 
matter; however I couldn't vouch the need of these messages on other 
architectures.


If there are no further concerns, I definitely prefer sending a second 
version of this patch only eliminating these messages and attesting the 
reason why.


Thank you very much for your review Bjorn,

--
Desnes A. Nunes do Rosário



Re: [PATCH 1/2, pci] pci: Addition of PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN attribute to the PCI subsystem

2018-03-14 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

Hello Andy,

On 03/14/2018 02:41 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario
 wrote:

Add PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN to pci_dev_flags and use it to
silent PCI realignment messages if the flag is turned on by a driver.


It doesn't explain "Why?"
Why the driver needs that?


I have written down the reason on the cover letter, but I concur on 
creating a second version of the patch's comment. Basically, all PCI 
resources on powerpc are printing out expected realignment messages 
which are flooding the systems logs.


Perhaps this would be better?
---
"Some architectures such as powerpc has aligned all of its PCI resources 
to its PAGE_SIZE during boot, thus the system logs will be flooded by 
expected realignment messages, which can be interpreted as a false 
positive for total PCI failure on the system.


[root@system user]# dmesg | grep -i disabling
[0.692270] pci :00:00.0: Disabling memory decoding and releasing 
memory resources

[0.692324] pci :00:00.0: disabling bridge mem windows
[0.729134] pci 0001:00:00.0: Disabling memory decoding and releasing 
memory resources

[0.737352] pci 0001:00:00.0: disabling bridge mem windows
[0.776295] pci 0002:00:00.0: Disabling memory decoding and releasing 
memory resources

[0.784509] pci 0002:00:00.0: disabling bridge mem windows
... and goes on for all PCI devices ...

Thus, this patch adds PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_REALIGN_MSG to pci_dev_flags and 
uses it to silent PCI realignment messages if the flag is turned on by a 
driver.

"
---



Another approach is to increase level of the message. Would it be
accepted by you (in case Bjorn agrees)?


--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags {
 PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_FLR_RESET = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 10),
 /* Don't use Relaxed Ordering for TLPs directed at this device */
 PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_RELAXED_ORDERING = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 
11),
+   /* Silent PCI resource realignment messages */
+   PCI_DEV_FLAGS_QUIET_PCI_REALIGN = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 12),


I would rather name it _NO_PCI_REALIGN_MSG


I concur on changing it to PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_REALIGN_MSG in a second 
version of the patchset.





  };




Thank you very much for your review,

--
Desnes A. Nunes do Rosário



Re: [PATCH, net] ibmvnic: fix firmware version when no firmware level has been provided by the VIOS server

2018-02-02 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

Hello Tyrel,

I concur with your observations, but since this patch has already been 
merged, I'll address them in another patch.


Thank you for your review,

On 02/01/2018 07:02 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:

On 02/01/2018 10:04 AM, Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosario wrote:

Older versions of VIOS servers do not send the firmware level in the VPD
buffer for the ibmvnic driver. Thus, not only the current message is mis-
leading but the firmware version in the ethtool will be NULL. Therefore,
this patch fixes the firmware string and its warning.

Fixes: 4e6759be28e4 ("ibmvnic: Feature implementation of VPD for the ibmvnic 
driver")

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario <desn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 6 +-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index b65f5f3ac034..2b3e71b63a7a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -3290,7 +3290,11 @@ static void handle_vpd_rsp(union ibmvnic_crq *crq,
 */
substr = strnstr(adapter->vpd->buff, "RM", adapter->vpd->len);
if (!substr) {
-   dev_info(dev, "No FW level provided by VPD\n");
+   dev_info(dev, "Warning - No FW level has been provided in the VPD 
buffer by the VIOS Server\n");
+   ptr = strncpy((char *)adapter->fw_version, "N/A",


Is "N/A" the right thing to report? Would something like "Unknown" or 
"Unreported" be better?


+ 3 * sizeof(char));
+   if (!ptr)
+   dev_err(dev, "Failed to inform that firmware version is 
unavailable to the adapter\n");


The sentence structure here seems awkward. I would probably just get rid of 
this error and this one later in the function.

dev_err(dev, "Failed to isolate FW level string\n");

Instead just check and report if adapter->fw_version == NULL in the complete: 
label section.

-Tyrel


goto complete;
}





--
Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário
--

Linux Developer - IBM / Brazil
M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering - UFRN



Re: [PATCH, net] ibmvnic: fix firmware version when no firmware level has been provided by the VIOS server

2018-02-02 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

Hello David,

Thank you for your review and the heads up about protocol.

On 02/01/2018 05:59 PM, David Miller wrote:

From: Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosario <desn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu,  1 Feb 2018 16:04:30 -0200


Older versions of VIOS servers do not send the firmware level in the VPD
buffer for the ibmvnic driver. Thus, not only the current message is mis-
leading but the firmware version in the ethtool will be NULL. Therefore,
this patch fixes the firmware string and its warning.

Fixes: 4e6759be28e4 ("ibmvnic: Feature implementation of VPD for the ibmvnic 
driver")

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario <desn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


Applied.

Please do not put empty lines between Fixes: and Signed-off-by: and other
tags, all tags are equal and are placed together in an uninterrupted
sequences of consequetive lines.

Thank you.



--
Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário
--

Linux Developer - IBM / Brazil
M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering - UFRN



Re: [PATCH] [powerpc-next] Fix powerpc64 alignment of .toc section in kernel modules

2017-12-07 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

Hello Michael,

On 12/07/2017 10:25 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:

Hi Desnes,

Am I right that Alan largely wrote this patch?

If so it should probably be From: him, so that he is the author in the
git log.


Yes, Alan Modra is the main author and I am just committing it with 
minor changes. Thus, the author change is necessary.





Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosario <desn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
index 1381693..c472f5b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ UTS_MACHINE := $(subst $(space),,$(machine-y))
  ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
  KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE += arch/powerpc/lib/crtsavres.o
  else
+KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE += -T arch/powerpc/kernel/module.lds


This needs to be:

KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE += -T $(srctree)/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.lds

Otherwise building with O=../build fails with:

   ld: cannot open linker script file arch/powerpc/kernel/module.lds: No such 
file or directory

I'll fix it up.


Indeed; this change is necessary to avoid any path errors.




diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
index 759104b..9b2c5c1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c
@@ -374,11 +377,13 @@ int module_frob_arch_sections(Elf64_Ehdr *hdr,
  }
  
  /* r2 is the TOC pointer: it actually points 0x8000 into the TOC (this

-   gives the value maximum span in an instruction which uses a signed
-   offset) */
+ * gives the value maximum span in an instruction which uses a signed
+ * offset).  Round down to a 256 byte boundary for the odd case where
+ * we are setting up r2 without a .toc section.
+ */
  static inline unsigned long my_r2(const Elf64_Shdr *sechdrs, struct module 
*me)
  {
-   return sechdrs[me->arch.toc_section].sh_addr + 0x8000;
+   return (sechdrs[me->arch.toc_section].sh_addr & -256) + 0x8000;


I think it's more typical in the kernel to write -256 as ~0xff.

Again I can fix it up.


Good to know!



cheers



Lastly, will you fix it up or do you want me to send a second version 
then? Whatever is best for you.


Thank you for the review.

--
Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário
--

Linux Developer - IBM / Brazil
M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering - UFRN

(11) 9595-30-900
desn...@br.ibm.com



Re: [PATCH] [net-next,v2] ibmvnic: fix dma_mapping_error call

2017-11-16 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

First of all, I apologize for sending this patch to net-next!

Since this is a fix, it should had been sent to the regular net tree, 
which I'll do now with the proper fixes tag. My mistake!


Thanks for understanding and please discard this one.

On 11/16/2017 04:33 PM, Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosario wrote:

This patch fixes the dma_mapping_error call to use the correct dma_addr
which is inside the ibmvnic_vpd struct. Moreover, it fixes a uninitialized
  warning for the local dma_addr.

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario <desn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index 04aaacb..1dc4aef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -849,7 +849,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_get_vpd(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
  {
struct device *dev = >vdev->dev;
union ibmvnic_crq crq;
-   dma_addr_t dma_addr;
int len = 0;

if (adapter->vpd->buff)
@@ -879,7 +878,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_get_vpd(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
adapter->vpd->dma_addr =
dma_map_single(dev, adapter->vpd->buff, adapter->vpd->len,
   DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-   if (dma_mapping_error(dev, dma_addr)) {
+   if (dma_mapping_error(dev, adapter->vpd->dma_addr)) {
dev_err(dev, "Could not map VPD buffer\n");
kfree(adapter->vpd->buff);
        return -ENOMEM;



--
Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário
--

Linux Developer - IBM / Brazil
M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering - UFRN

(11) 9595-30-900
desn...@br.ibm.com



Re: [PATCH] [net-next] ibmvnic: This patch fixes the dma_mapping_error call to use the correct dma_addr which is inside the ibmvnic_vpd struct.

2017-11-16 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário

Version 2 of this patch has been already sent with correct styling.

On 11/16/2017 04:28 PM, Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosario wrote:

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario <desn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index 04aaacb..1dc4aef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -849,7 +849,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_get_vpd(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
  {
struct device *dev = >vdev->dev;
union ibmvnic_crq crq;
-   dma_addr_t dma_addr;
int len = 0;

if (adapter->vpd->buff)
@@ -879,7 +878,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_get_vpd(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
adapter->vpd->dma_addr =
dma_map_single(dev, adapter->vpd->buff, adapter->vpd->len,
   DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-   if (dma_mapping_error(dev, dma_addr)) {
+   if (dma_mapping_error(dev, adapter->vpd->dma_addr)) {
dev_err(dev, "Could not map VPD buffer\n");
kfree(adapter->vpd->buff);
        return -ENOMEM;



--
Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário
--

Linux Developer - IBM / Brazil
M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering - UFRN

(11) 9595-30-900
desn...@br.ibm.com



Re: [PATCH] [net-next,v3] ibmvnic: Feature implementation of Vital Product Data (VPD) for the ibmvnic driver

2017-11-10 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário



On 11/10/2017 12:54 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:

On 11/10/2017 08:41 AM, Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário wrote:



On 11/09/2017 06:31 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:

On 11/09/2017 01:00 PM, Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosario wrote:

This patch implements and enables VDP support for the ibmvnic driver.
Moreover, it includes the implementation of suitable structs, signal
   transmission/handling and functions which allows the retrival of firmware
   information from the ibmvnic card through the ethtool command.

Signed-off-by: Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario <desn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
   drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 149 
-
   drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h |  27 ++-
   2 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index d0cff28..693b502 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -573,6 +573,15 @@ static int reset_tx_pools(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
   return 0;
   }

+static void release_vpd_data(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
+{
+    if (!adapter->vpd)
+    return;
+
+    kfree(adapter->vpd->buff);
+    kfree(adapter->vpd);
+}
+
   static void release_tx_pools(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
   {
   struct ibmvnic_tx_pool *tx_pool;
@@ -753,6 +762,8 @@ static void release_resources(struct ibmvnic_adapter 
*adapter)
   {
   int i;

+    release_vpd_data(adapter);
+
   release_tx_pools(adapter);
   release_rx_pools(adapter);

@@ -833,6 +844,53 @@ static int set_real_num_queues(struct net_device *netdev)
   return rc;
   }

+static int ibmvnic_get_vpd(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
+{
+    struct device *dev = >vdev->dev;
+    union ibmvnic_crq crq;
+    dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+    int len;
+
+    if (adapter->vpd->buff)
+    len = adapter->vpd->len;
+
+    reinit_completion(>fw_done);
+    crq.get_vpd_size.first = IBMVNIC_CRQ_CMD;
+    crq.get_vpd_size.cmd = GET_VPD_SIZE;
+    ibmvnic_send_crq(adapter, );
+    wait_for_completion(>fw_done);
+


Shouldn't there be a check for the return code when getting the
vpd size?


Hello Nathan,

This check is already being performed on the handle_vpd_size_rsp() function 
down below.

In short, a GET_VPD_SIZE signal is sent here through a ibmvnic_crq union in 
ibmvnic_send_crq(), whereas handle_query_ip_offload_rsp() receives from the VNIC 
adapter a GET_VPD_SIZE_RSP containing a ibmvnic_crq union with the vpd size 
information and the rc.code. If successful, a >fw_done is sent and 
this part of the code continues; however if not, a dev_error() is thrown. Same logic 
applies to GET_VPD/GET_VPD_RSP.



Yes, I did see that code. You do a complet of the completion variable for both 
success and failure,
this then lets this routine continue irregardless of the results of the get vpd 
size request. The
call to dev_err will print the error message but does not prevent use from 
bailing if the
get vpd size fails. Perhaps setting vpd->len to -1 to indicate the get vpd call 
failed which could
then be checked by the requester.

-Nathan

 >> What I am adding on the next version of the patch is a check if 
adapter->vpd->len is different than 0 before allocating 
adapter->vpd->buff, since that in a case of a failure, adapter->vpd->len 
will be 0.


I do concur with your observation that the break is necessary.

If the reception of vpd failed, adapter->vpd->len will be still zeroed 
out since it was created with kzalloc in init_resources().


Thus, do you agree if in the next version I send the following code?

===
  +   reinit_completion(>fw_done);
  +   crq.get_vpd_size.first = IBMVNIC_CRQ_CMD;
  +   crq.get_vpd_size.cmd = GET_VPD_SIZE;
  +   ibmvnic_send_crq(adapter, );
  +   wait_for_completion(>fw_done);
  +
->+   if(!adapter->vpd->len)
->+   return -ENODATA;
  +
  +   if (!adapter->vpd->buff)
  +   adapter->vpd->buff = kzalloc(adapter->vpd->len, 
GFP_KERNEL);

  +   else if (adapter->vpd->len != len)
  +   adapter->vpd->buff =
  +   krealloc(adapter->vpd->buff,
  +adapter->vpd->len, GFP_KERNEL);
===



Best Regards,





+    if (!adapter->vpd->buff)
+    adapter->vpd->buff = kzalloc(adapter->vpd->len, GFP_KERNEL);
+    else if (adapter->vpd->len != len)
+    adapter->vpd->buff =
+    krealloc(adapter->vpd->buff,
+ adapter->vpd->len, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+    if (!adapter->vpd->buff) {
+    dev_err(dev, "Could allocate VPD buffer\n");
+    return -ENOMEM;
+    }
+
+    adapter->vpd->dma_addr =
+    dma_map_si

Re: [PATCH] [net-next,v3] ibmvnic: Feature implementation of Vital Product Data (VPD) for the ibmvnic driver

2017-11-10 Thread Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário
rc;
+} __packed __aligned(8);
+
  struct ibmvnic_acl_change_indication {
u8 first;
u8 cmd;
@@ -700,10 +713,10 @@ union ibmvnic_crq {
struct ibmvnic_change_mac_addr change_mac_addr_rsp;
struct ibmvnic_multicast_ctrl multicast_ctrl;
struct ibmvnic_multicast_ctrl multicast_ctrl_rsp;
-   struct ibmvnic_generic_crq get_vpd_size;
+   struct ibmvnic_get_vpd_size get_vpd_size;
struct ibmvnic_get_vpd_size_rsp get_vpd_size_rsp;
struct ibmvnic_get_vpd get_vpd;
-   struct ibmvnic_generic_crq get_vpd_rsp;
+   struct ibmvnic_get_vpd_rsp get_vpd_rsp;
struct ibmvnic_acl_change_indication acl_change_indication;
struct ibmvnic_acl_query acl_query;
struct ibmvnic_generic_crq acl_query_rsp;
@@ -937,6 +950,12 @@ struct ibmvnic_error_buff {
__be32 error_id;
  };

+struct ibmvnic_vpd {
+   unsigned char *buff;
+   dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+   u64 len;
+};
+
  enum vnic_state {VNIC_PROBING = 1,
 VNIC_PROBED,
 VNIC_OPENING,
@@ -978,6 +997,10 @@ struct ibmvnic_adapter {
dma_addr_t ip_offload_ctrl_tok;
u32 msg_enable;

+   /* Vital Product Data (VPD) */
+   struct ibmvnic_vpd *vpd;
+   char fw_version[32];
+
/* Statistics */
struct ibmvnic_statistics stats;
dma_addr_t stats_token;



--
Desnes Augusto Nunes do Rosário
--

Linux Developer - IBM / Brazil
M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering - UFRN

desn...@br.ibm.com