Re: DMA Mapping Error in ppc64
Hi Ben
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 3:19 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<b...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:41 -0500, Jared Bents wrote:
>> Thank you for the advice. Looks like I get to try to rewrite the ath9k and
>> ath10k drivers to use dma_alloc_coherent() instead of kmemdup() and
>> dev_alloc_skb()
>
> Euh no... dev_alloc_skb() is the right thing to do for receive
> packets for a device driver.
>
> The arch should be able to map that for DMA, even if include
> bounce buffers via swiotlb.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
I have fixed the kmemdup usage to be dma_alloc_coherent() in the ath10k driver.
While dev_alloc_skb() is the right thing to do for receive packets,
the dma_map_single for all of those buffers fails. So it looks like I
have to add the ifdef conditional from
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c to struct sk_buff
*__netdev_alloc_skb() in net/core/skbuff.c
#if defined(CONFIG_FSL_PCI) && defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32)
gfp_mask |= GFP_DMA32;
#endif
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 6:27 PM, Oliver <ooh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:41 PM, Jared Bents
> <jared.be...@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
>> Thank you for the advice. Looks like I get to try to rewrite the ath9k and
>> ath10k drivers to use dma_alloc_coherent() instead of kmemdup() and
>> dev_alloc_skb()
>
> I don't think you need to go that far. It looks like you might be able
> to fix the uses of kmemdup() and kzalloc() in
> ath10k_pci_hif_exchange_bmi_msg() and call it a day. Auditing the
> other uses of dma_map_single() to see if they're using kmalloc()
> memory might be a good idea too.
>
> Anyway this is probably something you're better off taking to the ath10k list.
>
> Thanks,
> Oliver
>
I'll take my update of kmemdup to dma_alloc_coherent() to the ath10k
mailing list. However, even after updating to use
dma_alloc_coherent() and adding the conditional to
__netdev_alloc_skb() for the rx skb's used in the driver, I am still
getting a transmit error. I'm struggling to track down where in the
kernel the skb being taken from a queue is coming from in
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
I will ask ath10k about this as well. The skb being taken off the
queue below is later DMAed with dma_map_single and that fails but
since I haven't figured out where it comes from, I haven't been able
to try to fix it.
void ath10k_offchan_tx_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
>...struct ath10k *ar = container_of(work, struct ath10k, offchan_tx_work);
[...]
>...for (;;) {
>...>...skb = skb_dequeue(>offchan_tx_queue);
Thank you for all the help,
Jared
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Oliver <ooh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 1:37 AM, Jared Bents
>>> <jared.be...@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
>>> > Thank you for the response but unfortunately, it looks like I already
>>> > have that and it is being used. To verify, I commented that out and
>>> > got the failure "dma_direct_alloc_coherent: No suitable zone for pfn
>>> > 0xe". Below is the code flow for function
>>> > ath10k_pci_hif_exchange_bmi_msg which is showing the first dma mapping
>>> > error.
>>> >
>>> > ath10k_pci_hif_exchange_bmi_msg -> dma_map_single ->
>>> > dma_map_single_attrs -> swiotlb_map_page -> dma_capable (returns
>>> > false)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > dma_capable is what reports the failure in that flow.
>>> >
>>> > static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
>>> > size_t size)
>>> > {
>>> > #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
>>> > struct dev_archdata *sd = >archdata;
>>> >
>>> >if (sd->max_direct_dma_addr && addr + size > sd->max_direct_dma_addr)
>>> > return false;
>>> > #endif
>>> >
>>> > if (!dev->dma_mask)
>>> > return false;
>>> >
>>> > return addr + size - 1 <= *dev->dma_mask;
>>> > }
>>> > Getting the below values:
>>> > addr = 1ee376218
>>> > size = 4
>>> > sd->max_direct_dma_addr = e000 which is I believe DMA window size
>>> > (e000)
>>> >
>>> > when executed sd->max_direct_dma_addr(e000) && addr(1ee376218) +
>>> > size(4) becomes e004 which is > sd->max_direct_dma_addr (e000)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > So even though limit_zone_pfn(ZONE_DMA32, 1UL << (31 - PAGE_SHIFT)) is
>>> > being us
Re: DMA Mapping Error in ppc64
Thank you for the advice. Looks like I get to try to rewrite the ath9k and
ath10k drivers to use dma_alloc_coherent() instead of kmemdup() and
dev_alloc_skb()
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Oliver <ooh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 1:37 AM, Jared Bents
> <jared.be...@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for the response but unfortunately, it looks like I already
> > have that and it is being used. To verify, I commented that out and
> > got the failure "dma_direct_alloc_coherent: No suitable zone for pfn
> > 0xe". Below is the code flow for function
> > ath10k_pci_hif_exchange_bmi_msg which is showing the first dma mapping
> > error.
> >
> > ath10k_pci_hif_exchange_bmi_msg -> dma_map_single ->
> > dma_map_single_attrs -> swiotlb_map_page -> dma_capable (returns
> > false)
> >
> >
> > dma_capable is what reports the failure in that flow.
> >
> > static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> size_t size)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
> > struct dev_archdata *sd = >archdata;
> >
> >if (sd->max_direct_dma_addr && addr + size > sd->max_direct_dma_addr)
> > return false;
> > #endif
> >
> > if (!dev->dma_mask)
> > return false;
> >
> > return addr + size - 1 <= *dev->dma_mask;
> > }
> > Getting the below values:
> > addr = 1ee376218
> > size = 4
> > sd->max_direct_dma_addr = e000 which is I believe DMA window size
> (e000)
> >
> > when executed sd->max_direct_dma_addr(e000) && addr(1ee376218) +
> > size(4) becomes e004 which is > sd->max_direct_dma_addr (e000)
> >
> >
> > So even though limit_zone_pfn(ZONE_DMA32, 1UL << (31 - PAGE_SHIFT)) is
> > being used in arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c,
>
> > kmemdup(req, req_len, GFP_KERNEL) is returning an address that when
> > sent to dma_map_single(), results in a bad map.
>
> You need to use (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA32) to constrain the allocations
> to ZONE_DMA32. Without that the kmemdup() will allocate from any zone
> so you'll probably get an unmappable address.
>
> That said, the driver probably shouldn't be using kmemdup() here.
> DMA-API.txt pretty explicitly says that drivers should not assume that
> dma_map_single() will work with arbitrary memory. It should be using
> dma_alloc_coherent() or a dma pool here.
>
> > - Jared
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Oliver <ooh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Jared Bents
> >> <jared.be...@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Apologies for the amount of information but we've been debugging this
> >>> for a while and I wanted to get what we are seeing captured as much as
> >>> possible. We are a T1042 processor and have a total 8GB DDR and our
> >>> kernel version is fsl-sdk-v2.0-1703 (linux v4.1.35) as that is the
> >>> latest version supplied by NXP.
> >>>
> >>> A while ago we ported from 32 bit to 64 bit. Everything continued to
> >>> work except the ath10k module we have. So as a first step, we checked
> >>> to see if an ath9k module also failed to work and it was also no
> >>> longer working. The ath10k is working fine on a 32 bit system but
> >>> it's not working on 64 bit system as we are getting dma mapping errors
> >>> when trying to initialize the wifi modules.
> >>>
> >>> pci_bus 0002:01: bus scan returning with max=01
> >>> pci_bus 0002:01: busn_res: [bus 01] end is updated to 01
> >>> pci_bus 0002:00: bus scan returning with max=01
> >>> ath10k_pci :01:00.0: unable to get target info from device
> >>> ath10k_pci :01:00.0: could not get target info (-5)
> >>> ath10k_pci :01:00.0: could not probe fw (-5)
> >>> ath10k_pci 0001:01:00.0: Direct firmware load for
> >>> ath10k/cal-pci-0001:01:00.0.bin failed with error -2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> First, we have tried the mainline kernel (v4.15) to see if that would
> >>> fix the issue, it did not. So I made a patch for the ath10k driver to
> >>> restrict to just GFP_DMA areas when allocating memory or creating
> >>> sk_buffs and have attached it. The ath10k wifi modules now initialize
> >>> correctly but when I try to connect them and send traffic, they get a
> >>> DMA mapping error from the
Re: DMA Mapping Error in ppc64
Thank you for the response but unfortunately, it looks like I already
have that and it is being used. To verify, I commented that out and
got the failure "dma_direct_alloc_coherent: No suitable zone for pfn
0xe". Below is the code flow for function
ath10k_pci_hif_exchange_bmi_msg which is showing the first dma mapping
error.
ath10k_pci_hif_exchange_bmi_msg -> dma_map_single ->
dma_map_single_attrs -> swiotlb_map_page -> dma_capable (returns
false)
dma_capable is what reports the failure in that flow.
static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
struct dev_archdata *sd = >archdata;
if (sd->max_direct_dma_addr && addr + size > sd->max_direct_dma_addr)
return false;
#endif
if (!dev->dma_mask)
return false;
return addr + size - 1 <= *dev->dma_mask;
}
Getting the below values:
addr = 1ee376218
size = 4
sd->max_direct_dma_addr = e000 which is I believe DMA window size (e000)
when executed sd->max_direct_dma_addr(e000) && addr(1ee376218) +
size(4) becomes e004 which is > sd->max_direct_dma_addr (e000)
So even though limit_zone_pfn(ZONE_DMA32, 1UL << (31 - PAGE_SHIFT)) is
being used in arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/corenet_generic.c,
kmemdup(req, req_len, GFP_KERNEL) is returning an address that when
sent to dma_map_single(), results in a bad map.
- Jared
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Oliver <ooh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Jared Bents
> <jared.be...@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Apologies for the amount of information but we've been debugging this
>> for a while and I wanted to get what we are seeing captured as much as
>> possible. We are a T1042 processor and have a total 8GB DDR and our
>> kernel version is fsl-sdk-v2.0-1703 (linux v4.1.35) as that is the
>> latest version supplied by NXP.
>>
>> A while ago we ported from 32 bit to 64 bit. Everything continued to
>> work except the ath10k module we have. So as a first step, we checked
>> to see if an ath9k module also failed to work and it was also no
>> longer working. The ath10k is working fine on a 32 bit system but
>> it's not working on 64 bit system as we are getting dma mapping errors
>> when trying to initialize the wifi modules.
>>
>> pci_bus 0002:01: bus scan returning with max=01
>> pci_bus 0002:01: busn_res: [bus 01] end is updated to 01
>> pci_bus 0002:00: bus scan returning with max=01
>> ath10k_pci :01:00.0: unable to get target info from device
>> ath10k_pci :01:00.0: could not get target info (-5)
>> ath10k_pci :01:00.0: could not probe fw (-5)
>> ath10k_pci 0001:01:00.0: Direct firmware load for
>> ath10k/cal-pci-0001:01:00.0.bin failed with error -2
>>
>>
>> First, we have tried the mainline kernel (v4.15) to see if that would
>> fix the issue, it did not. So I made a patch for the ath10k driver to
>> restrict to just GFP_DMA areas when allocating memory or creating
>> sk_buffs and have attached it. The ath10k wifi modules now initialize
>> correctly but when I try to connect them and send traffic, they get a
>> DMA mapping error from the sk_buff that it receives from elsewhere in
>> the kernel. So while the driver appears to be fixable with the patch,
>> the modules are still unusable due to data being sent to the driver
>> when ath10k_tx is called and it tries to dma map with the provided
>> skb. Also, according to the ath10k mailing list, GFP_DMA is not
>> supposed to be used in general. The error below is the same sort of
>> dma mapping error that is seen when initializing the modules without
>> the patch to OR with GFP_DMA.
>>
>> ath10k_pci 0001:01:00.0: failed to transmit packet, dropping: -5
>>
>>
>> We asked on the ath10k mailing list if anyone else is having this
>> problem and no one else seems to have the issue but they are using
>> different architectures (ARM or X86). As a result, it does not seem to
>> be a driver issue to us but something within the PowerPC arch. So we
>> dug a little deeper to try to find what addresses being mapped are
>> working and what address being mapped are not working.
>>
>> We found that when the virtual address of data pointer (a member of
>> sk_buff) is above ~3.7 GB RAM address range then return address from
>> dma_map_single API is failed to validate in dma_mapping_error
>> function.
>>
>> We also noticed that in a 64bit machine sometimes ping is working and
>> because of the virtual address is under ~3.7GAM RAM address range. So
>> if we set mem=2048M in the bootarg
DMA Mapping Error in ppc64
Hi all, Apologies for the amount of information but we've been debugging this for a while and I wanted to get what we are seeing captured as much as possible. We are a T1042 processor and have a total 8GB DDR and our kernel version is fsl-sdk-v2.0-1703 (linux v4.1.35) as that is the latest version supplied by NXP. A while ago we ported from 32 bit to 64 bit. Everything continued to work except the ath10k module we have. So as a first step, we checked to see if an ath9k module also failed to work and it was also no longer working. The ath10k is working fine on a 32 bit system but it's not working on 64 bit system as we are getting dma mapping errors when trying to initialize the wifi modules. pci_bus 0002:01: bus scan returning with max=01 pci_bus 0002:01: busn_res: [bus 01] end is updated to 01 pci_bus 0002:00: bus scan returning with max=01 ath10k_pci :01:00.0: unable to get target info from device ath10k_pci :01:00.0: could not get target info (-5) ath10k_pci :01:00.0: could not probe fw (-5) ath10k_pci 0001:01:00.0: Direct firmware load for ath10k/cal-pci-0001:01:00.0.bin failed with error -2 First, we have tried the mainline kernel (v4.15) to see if that would fix the issue, it did not. So I made a patch for the ath10k driver to restrict to just GFP_DMA areas when allocating memory or creating sk_buffs and have attached it. The ath10k wifi modules now initialize correctly but when I try to connect them and send traffic, they get a DMA mapping error from the sk_buff that it receives from elsewhere in the kernel. So while the driver appears to be fixable with the patch, the modules are still unusable due to data being sent to the driver when ath10k_tx is called and it tries to dma map with the provided skb. Also, according to the ath10k mailing list, GFP_DMA is not supposed to be used in general. The error below is the same sort of dma mapping error that is seen when initializing the modules without the patch to OR with GFP_DMA. ath10k_pci 0001:01:00.0: failed to transmit packet, dropping: -5 We asked on the ath10k mailing list if anyone else is having this problem and no one else seems to have the issue but they are using different architectures (ARM or X86). As a result, it does not seem to be a driver issue to us but something within the PowerPC arch. So we dug a little deeper to try to find what addresses being mapped are working and what address being mapped are not working. We found that when the virtual address of data pointer (a member of sk_buff) is above ~3.7 GB RAM address range then return address from dma_map_single API is failed to validate in dma_mapping_error function. We also noticed that in a 64bit machine sometimes ping is working and because of the virtual address is under ~3.7GAM RAM address range. So if we set mem=2048M in the bootargs, the ath10k module works perfectly, however this isn't a real solution since it cuts our available RAM from 8GB to 2GB. Any information that could help us resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Jared
