[MailServer Resend] Quarantined email -- use caution when opening.Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use __weak macro for smp_setup_processor_id
- Original Message Header - Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use __weak macro for smp_setup_processor_id From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; --- Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking rules. Use caution when accessing the contents. ---BeginMessage--- On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:19:07 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:56:18 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use the __weak macro instead of the longer __attribute__ ((weak)) form Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- init/main.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c 2008-04-18 16:44:32.0 +1000 +++ linux-work/init/main.c2008-04-18 16:44:37.0 +1000 @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void __init boot_cpu_init(void) cpu_set(cpu, cpu_possible_map); } -void __init __attribute__((weak)) smp_setup_processor_id(void) +void __init __weak smp_setup_processor_id(void) { } ack on all three. Please fold #3 into #1 and add both to git-powerpc. Damn ! I took 5mn to actually split it out in order to not do two different things in one patch :-) ah, I misread it. I thought this was changing the __attribute__((weak)) which patch #1 added. But it's changing a different one. I though that was odd. Will do. whatever ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ---End Message--- ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
[MailServer Resend] Quarantined email -- use caution when opening.Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use __weak macro for smp_setup_processor_id
- Original Message Header - Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use __weak macro for smp_setup_processor_id From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; --- Warning: Attachment contains virus code or meets the filtering/blocking rules. Use caution when accessing the contents. ---BeginMessage--- On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:56:18 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use the __weak macro instead of the longer __attribute__ ((weak)) form Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- init/main.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c 2008-04-18 16:44:32.0 +1000 +++ linux-work/init/main.c 2008-04-18 16:44:37.0 +1000 @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void __init boot_cpu_init(void) cpu_set(cpu, cpu_possible_map); } -void __init __attribute__((weak)) smp_setup_processor_id(void) +void __init __weak smp_setup_processor_id(void) { } ack on all three. Please fold #3 into #1 and add both to git-powerpc. Damn ! I took 5mn to actually split it out in order to not do two different things in one patch :-) Will do. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ---End Message--- ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev