Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add missing asm/cacheflush.h

2020-06-15 Thread Christophe Leroy




Le 14/06/2020 à 20:57, Chuck Lever a écrit :

Hi Christophe -


On Jun 14, 2020, at 1:07 PM, Christophe Leroy  
wrote:

Even if that's only a warning, not including asm/cacheflush.h
leads to svc_flush_bvec() being empty allthough powerpc defines
ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE.

  CC  net/sunrpc/svcsock.o
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:227:5: warning: "ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE" is not 
defined [-Wundef]
#if ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE
 ^

Fixes: ca07eda33e01 ("SUNRPC: Refactor svc_recvfrom()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
---
I detected this on linux-next on June 4th and warned Chuck. Seems like it went 
into mainline anyway.


Thanks for your patch. I've searched my mailbox. It appears I never
received your June 4th e-mail.


It is there: 
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/868915eb-8fed-0600-ea5d-31ae87445...@csgroup.eu/




Does your patch also address:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=159194369128024=2 ?


I guess it does, yes.



If so, then

Reported-by: kernel test robot 

should be added to the patch description.

Ideally, compilation on x86_64 should have thrown the same warning,
but it didn't. Why would the x86_64 build behave differently than
ppc64 or i386?


I think it depends whether you have selected CONFIG_BLOCK or not.
In my embedded config, CONFIG_BLOCK isn't selected.

When CONFIG_BLOCK is selected, there is the following inclusion chain:

  CC  net/sunrpc/svcsock.o
In file included from ./include/linux/highmem.h:12:0,
 from ./include/linux/pagemap.h:11,
 from ./include/linux/blkdev.h:16,
 from ./include/linux/blk-cgroup.h:23,
 from ./include/linux/writeback.h:14,
 from ./include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
 from ./include/net/sock.h:53,
 from ./include/net/inet_sock.h:22,
 from ./include/linux/udp.h:16,
 from net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:31:
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/cacheflush.h:26:2: warning: #warning Coucous 
[-Wcpp]

 #warning test

But linux/blkdev.h includes linux/pagemap.h only when CONFIG_BLOCK is 
defined.






net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 5c4ec9386f81..d9e99cb09aab 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include 
#include 
#include 
+#include 


Nit: Let's include  in net/sunrpc/svcsock.h instead
of  directly.


Ok, I'll post v2.





#include 
#include 
--
2.25.0



--
Chuck Lever





Christophe


Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add missing asm/cacheflush.h

2020-06-14 Thread Chuck Lever
Hi Christophe -

> On Jun 14, 2020, at 1:07 PM, Christophe Leroy  
> wrote:
> 
> Even if that's only a warning, not including asm/cacheflush.h
> leads to svc_flush_bvec() being empty allthough powerpc defines
> ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE.
> 
>  CC  net/sunrpc/svcsock.o
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:227:5: warning: "ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE" is 
> not defined [-Wundef]
> #if ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE
> ^
> 
> Fixes: ca07eda33e01 ("SUNRPC: Refactor svc_recvfrom()")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
> ---
> I detected this on linux-next on June 4th and warned Chuck. Seems like it 
> went into mainline anyway.

Thanks for your patch. I've searched my mailbox. It appears I never
received your June 4th e-mail.

Does your patch also address:

   https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=159194369128024=2 ?

If so, then

   Reported-by: kernel test robot 

should be added to the patch description.

Ideally, compilation on x86_64 should have thrown the same warning,
but it didn't. Why would the x86_64 build behave differently than
ppc64 or i386?


> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 5c4ec9386f81..d9e99cb09aab 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #include 
> #include 
> #include 
> +#include 

Nit: Let's include  in net/sunrpc/svcsock.h instead
of  directly.


> #include 
> #include 
> -- 
> 2.25.0
> 

--
Chuck Lever





[PATCH] SUNRPC: Add missing asm/cacheflush.h

2020-06-14 Thread Christophe Leroy
Even if that's only a warning, not including asm/cacheflush.h
leads to svc_flush_bvec() being empty allthough powerpc defines
ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE.

  CC  net/sunrpc/svcsock.o
net/sunrpc/svcsock.c:227:5: warning: "ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE" is not 
defined [-Wundef]
 #if ARCH_IMPLEMENTS_FLUSH_DCACHE_PAGE
 ^

Fixes: ca07eda33e01 ("SUNRPC: Refactor svc_recvfrom()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy 
---
 I detected this on linux-next on June 4th and warned Chuck. Seems like it went 
into mainline anyway.

 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 5c4ec9386f81..d9e99cb09aab 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 
 #include 
 #include 
-- 
2.25.0