Re: [PATCH] macintosh/adb-iop: Send correct poll command

2020-12-04 Thread Finn Thain
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Hi Finn,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:54 AM Finn Thain  wrote:
> > The behaviour of the IOP firmware is not well documented but we do know
> > that IOP message reply data can be used to issue new ADB commands.
> > Use the message reply to better control autopoll behaviour by sending
> > a Talk Register 0 command after every ADB response, not unlike the
> > algorithm in the via-macii driver. This poll command is addressed to
> > that device which last received a Talk command (explicit or otherwise).
> >
> > Cc: Joshua Thompson 
> > Fixes: fa3b5a9929fc ("macintosh/adb-iop: Implement idle -> sending state 
> > transition")
> 
> WARNING: Unknown commit id 'fa3b5a9929fc', maybe rebased or not pulled?
> 
> 32226e817043?
> 

Yes, that's the one. I accidentally gave a commit id from one of my 
backport branches.

> > Tested-by: Stan Johnson 
> > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain 
> 
> Thanks, will queue in the m68k for-v5.11 branch.
> 

Thanks.

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
> Geert
> 
> 


Re: [PATCH] macintosh/adb-iop: Send correct poll command

2020-12-04 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Finn,

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:54 AM Finn Thain  wrote:
> The behaviour of the IOP firmware is not well documented but we do know
> that IOP message reply data can be used to issue new ADB commands.
> Use the message reply to better control autopoll behaviour by sending
> a Talk Register 0 command after every ADB response, not unlike the
> algorithm in the via-macii driver. This poll command is addressed to
> that device which last received a Talk command (explicit or otherwise).
>
> Cc: Joshua Thompson 
> Fixes: fa3b5a9929fc ("macintosh/adb-iop: Implement idle -> sending state 
> transition")

WARNING: Unknown commit id 'fa3b5a9929fc', maybe rebased or not pulled?

32226e817043?

> Tested-by: Stan Johnson 
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain 

Thanks, will queue in the m68k for-v5.11 branch.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


[PATCH] macintosh/adb-iop: Send correct poll command

2020-11-19 Thread Finn Thain
The behaviour of the IOP firmware is not well documented but we do know
that IOP message reply data can be used to issue new ADB commands.
Use the message reply to better control autopoll behaviour by sending
a Talk Register 0 command after every ADB response, not unlike the
algorithm in the via-macii driver. This poll command is addressed to
that device which last received a Talk command (explicit or otherwise).

Cc: Joshua Thompson 
Fixes: fa3b5a9929fc ("macintosh/adb-iop: Implement idle -> sending state 
transition")
Tested-by: Stan Johnson 
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain 
---
 drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c | 40 +++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c b/drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c
index f3d1a460fbce..6b26b6a2c463 100644
--- a/drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c
+++ b/drivers/macintosh/adb-iop.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 static struct adb_request *current_req;
 static struct adb_request *last_req;
 static unsigned int autopoll_devs;
+static u8 autopoll_addr;
 
 static enum adb_iop_state {
idle,
@@ -41,6 +42,11 @@ static int adb_iop_autopoll(int);
 static void adb_iop_poll(void);
 static int adb_iop_reset_bus(void);
 
+/* ADB command byte structure */
+#define ADDR_MASK   0xF0
+#define OP_MASK 0x0C
+#define TALK0x0C
+
 struct adb_driver adb_iop_driver = {
.name = "ISM IOP",
.probe= adb_iop_probe,
@@ -96,17 +102,24 @@ static void adb_iop_complete(struct iop_msg *msg)
 static void adb_iop_listen(struct iop_msg *msg)
 {
struct adb_iopmsg *amsg = (struct adb_iopmsg *)msg->message;
+   u8 addr = (amsg->cmd & ADDR_MASK) >> 4;
+   u8 op = amsg->cmd & OP_MASK;
unsigned long flags;
bool req_done = false;
 
local_irq_save(flags);
 
-   /* Handle a timeout. Timeout packets seem to occur even after
-* we've gotten a valid reply to a TALK, presumably because of
-* autopolling.
+   /* Responses to Talk commands may be unsolicited as they are
+* produced when the IOP polls devices. They are mostly timeouts.
 */
-
-   if (amsg->flags & ADB_IOP_EXPLICIT) {
+   if (op == TALK && ((1 << addr) & autopoll_devs))
+   autopoll_addr = addr;
+
+   switch (amsg->flags & (ADB_IOP_EXPLICIT |
+  ADB_IOP_AUTOPOLL |
+  ADB_IOP_TIMEOUT)) {
+   case ADB_IOP_EXPLICIT:
+   case ADB_IOP_EXPLICIT | ADB_IOP_TIMEOUT:
if (adb_iop_state == awaiting_reply) {
struct adb_request *req = current_req;
 
@@ -115,12 +128,16 @@ static void adb_iop_listen(struct iop_msg *msg)
 
req_done = true;
}
-   } else if (!(amsg->flags & ADB_IOP_TIMEOUT)) {
-   adb_input(&amsg->cmd, amsg->count + 1,
- amsg->flags & ADB_IOP_AUTOPOLL);
+   break;
+   case ADB_IOP_AUTOPOLL:
+   if (((1 << addr) & autopoll_devs) &&
+   amsg->cmd == ADB_READREG(addr, 0))
+   adb_input(&amsg->cmd, amsg->count + 1, 1);
+   break;
}
-
-   msg->reply[0] = autopoll_devs ? ADB_IOP_AUTOPOLL : 0;
+   msg->reply[0] = autopoll_addr ? ADB_IOP_AUTOPOLL : 0;
+   msg->reply[1] = 0;
+   msg->reply[2] = autopoll_addr ? ADB_READREG(autopoll_addr, 0) : 0;
iop_complete_message(msg);
 
if (req_done)
@@ -233,6 +250,9 @@ static void adb_iop_set_ap_complete(struct iop_msg *msg)
struct adb_iopmsg *amsg = (struct adb_iopmsg *)msg->message;
 
autopoll_devs = (amsg->data[1] << 8) | amsg->data[0];
+   if (autopoll_devs & (1 << autopoll_addr))
+   return;
+   autopoll_addr = autopoll_devs ? (ffs(autopoll_devs) - 1) : 0;
 }
 
 static int adb_iop_autopoll(int devs)
-- 
2.26.2