Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: fix potential memory leak in init_cpu_associativity()

2022-12-13 Thread wangyufen




在 2022/12/13 14:06, Naveen N. Rao 写道:

Wang Yufen wrote:

If the vcpu_associativity alloc memory successfully but the
pcpu_associativity fails to alloc memory, the vcpu_associativity
memory leaks.

Fixes: d62c8deeb6e6 ("powerpc/pseries: Provide vcpu dispatch statistics")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen 
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c

index 97ef649..501ee6c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static int init_cpu_associativity(void)

 if (!vcpu_associativity || !pcpu_associativity) {
 pr_err("error allocating memory for associativity 
information\n");

+    kfree(vcpu_associativity);


I think we should call destroy_cpu_associativity() here instead. We 
don't know which allocation failed, so it is better to try and free 
both, and also to reset the pointers to 0.


Hi,

Okay, I'll send a v2 with the following modifications:

--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
@@ -524,8 +524,10 @@ static ssize_t vcpudispatch_stats_write(struct file 
*file, const char __user *p,


if (cmd) {
rc = init_cpu_associativity();
-   if (rc)
+   if (rc) {
+   destroy_cpu_associativity();
goto out;
+   }

for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
disp = per_cpu_ptr(&vcpu_disp_data, cpu);

Thanks,
Wang




- Naveen




Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: fix potential memory leak in init_cpu_associativity()

2022-12-12 Thread Naveen N. Rao

Wang Yufen wrote:

If the vcpu_associativity alloc memory successfully but the
pcpu_associativity fails to alloc memory, the vcpu_associativity
memory leaks.

Fixes: d62c8deeb6e6 ("powerpc/pseries: Provide vcpu dispatch statistics")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen 
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
index 97ef649..501ee6c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static int init_cpu_associativity(void)

if (!vcpu_associativity || !pcpu_associativity) {
pr_err("error allocating memory for associativity 
information\n");
+   kfree(vcpu_associativity);


I think we should call destroy_cpu_associativity() here instead. We 
don't know which allocation failed, so it is better to try and free 
both, and also to reset the pointers to 0.



- Naveen



[PATCH] powerpc/pseries: fix potential memory leak in init_cpu_associativity()

2022-12-07 Thread Wang Yufen
If the vcpu_associativity alloc memory successfully but the
pcpu_associativity fails to alloc memory, the vcpu_associativity
memory leaks.

Fixes: d62c8deeb6e6 ("powerpc/pseries: Provide vcpu dispatch statistics")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen 
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
index 97ef649..501ee6c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static int init_cpu_associativity(void)
 
if (!vcpu_associativity || !pcpu_associativity) {
pr_err("error allocating memory for associativity 
information\n");
+   kfree(vcpu_associativity);
return -ENOMEM;
}
 
-- 
1.8.3.1