Re: [PATCH] powerpc/tm: Limit TM code inside PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 09:49:05AM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote: hi Sasha, On 1/16/19 11:35 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: e1c3743e1a20 powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to recheckpoint. The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.2, v4.19.15, v4.14.93, v4.9.150. v4.20.2: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: Unable to calculate v4.19.15: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: Unable to calculate v4.14.93: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & sys_rt_sigreturn()") bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & ppc_fadvise64_64()") f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE") v4.9.150: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & sys_rt_sigreturn()") bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & ppc_fadvise64_64()") f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE") How should we proceed with this patch? I understand that the commit that this patch fixes is not integrated into stable tree. I think it does not need to make stable at this moment, thus. The commit it fixes (e1c3743e1a20) exists in all 4.9+ stable trees as it itself was tagged for stable. -- Thanks, Sasha
Re: [PATCH] powerpc/tm: Limit TM code inside PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
hi Sasha, On 1/16/19 11:35 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > Hi, > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, > fixing commit: e1c3743e1a20 powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to > recheckpoint. > > The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.2, v4.19.15, v4.14.93, v4.9.150. > > v4.20.2: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > Unable to calculate > > v4.19.15: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > Unable to calculate > > v4.14.93: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") > 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") > 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") > b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & > sys_rt_sigreturn()") > bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & > ppc_fadvise64_64()") > f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to > SYSCALL_DEFINE") > > v4.9.150: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") > 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") > 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") > b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & > sys_rt_sigreturn()") > bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & > ppc_fadvise64_64()") > f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to > SYSCALL_DEFINE") > > > How should we proceed with this patch? I understand that the commit that this patch fixes is not integrated into stable tree. I think it does not need to make stable at this moment, thus. Thanks, Breno
Re: [PATCH] powerpc/tm: Limit TM code inside PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: e1c3743e1a20 powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to recheckpoint. The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.2, v4.19.15, v4.14.93, v4.9.150. v4.20.2: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: Unable to calculate v4.19.15: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: Unable to calculate v4.14.93: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & sys_rt_sigreturn()") bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & ppc_fadvise64_64()") f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE") v4.9.150: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0d60619e1c0c ("powerpc: Add missing prototype for sys_debug_setcontext()") 67b464a89c21 ("powerpc/32: Mark both tmp variables as unused") 6f5b9f018f4c ("powerpc/tm: Unset MSR[TS] if not recheckpointing") b53875c4b4f2 ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for sys_sigreturn() & sys_rt_sigreturn()") bf7fb32dd5fc ("powerpc: Add missing prototypes for ppc_select() & ppc_fadvise64_64()") f3675644e172 ("powerpc/syscalls: signal_{32, 64} - switch to SYSCALL_DEFINE") How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha
[PATCH] powerpc/tm: Limit TM code inside PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
Commit e1c3743e1a20 ("powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to recheckpoint") moved a code block around and this block uses a 'msr' variable outside of the CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM, however the 'msr' variable is declared inside a CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM block, causing a possible error when CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTION_MEM is not defined. error: 'msr' undeclared (first use in this function) This is not causing a compilation error in the mainline kernel, because 'msr' is being used as an argument of MSR_TM_ACTIVE(), which is defined as the following when CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM is *not* set: #define MSR_TM_ACTIVE(x) 0 This patch just fixes this issue avoiding the 'msr' variable usage outside the CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM block, avoiding trusting in the MSR_TM_ACTIVE() definition. Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Christoph Biedl Fixes: e1c3743e1a20 ("powerpc/tm: Set MSR[TS] just prior to recheckpoint") Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao --- NB: Since stable kernels didn't cherry picked 5c784c8414fba ('powerpc/tm: Remove msr_tm_active()), MSR_TM_ACTIVE() is not defined as 0 for CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM=n case, thus triggering the compilation error above. Tested against stable kernel 4.19.13-rc2 and problem is now fixed when CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM=n arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c index daa28cb72272..8fe698162ab9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c @@ -739,11 +739,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn) if (restore_tm_sigcontexts(current, >uc_mcontext, _transact->uc_mcontext)) goto badframe; - } + } else #endif - /* Fall through, for non-TM restore */ - if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(msr)) { + { /* +* Fall through, for non-TM restore +* * Unset MSR[TS] on the thread regs since MSR from user * context does not have MSR active, and recheckpoint was * not called since restore_tm_sigcontexts() was not called -- 2.19.0