Prevailing practice for define_machine() in powerpc is to use the platform name when the platform has only one define_machine() statement, but maple uses "maple_md". This caused me some head-scratching when writing some new code that uses machine_is(maple).
Use "maple" instead of "maple_md". There should not be any behavioral change -- fixup_maple_ide() calls machine_is(maple) but the body of the function is ifdef'd out. Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c index 3ce2d73..3b32e07 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/setup.c @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int __init maple_probe(void) return 1; } -define_machine(maple_md) { +define_machine(maple) { .name = "Maple", .probe = maple_probe, .setup_arch = maple_setup_arch, -- 1.5.4.4 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev