Re: [PATCH 2/6] kvmppc: add hypercall infrastructure - host part
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Tony Breeds wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:36:43AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c @@ -203,6 +203,24 @@ kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, vcpu-arch.srr1); } +static int kvmppc_do_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int ret = 0; + + switch (vcpu-arch.gpr[0]) { + default: + printk(KERN_ERRunknown hypercall %d\n, vcpu-arch.gpr[0]); I think the preffered style is printk(KERN_ERR ...) You've made the same style mistake in most of you printk()'s in your other patches aswell. Note that these days people use pr_err() instead. With kind regards, Geert Uytterhoeven Software Architect Sony Techsoft Centre Europe The Corporate Village · Da Vincilaan 7-D1 · B-1935 Zaventem · Belgium Phone:+32 (0)2 700 8453 Fax: +32 (0)2 700 8622 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.sony-europe.com/ A division of Sony Europe (Belgium) N.V. VAT BE 0413.825.160 · RPR Brussels Fortis 293-0376800-10 GEBA-BE-BB___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
[PATCH 2/6] kvmppc: add hypercall infrastructure - host part
From: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] This adds the host portion of the hypercall infrastructure which receives the guest calls - no specific hcall function is implemented in this patch. Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [diffstat] arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c | 27 +++ include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h |2 ++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) [diff] diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c @@ -203,6 +203,24 @@ kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, vcpu-arch.srr1); } +static int kvmppc_do_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int ret = 0; + + switch (vcpu-arch.gpr[0]) { + default: + printk(KERN_ERRunknown hypercall %d\n, vcpu-arch.gpr[0]); + kvmppc_dump_vcpu(vcpu); + ret = -ENOSYS; + } + + vcpu-arch.gpr[11] = ret; + vcpu-arch.pc += 4; /* Advance past hypercall instruction. */ + + return ret; +} + + /* XXX to do: * lhax * lhaux @@ -232,6 +250,15 @@ int advance = 1; switch (get_op(inst)) { + case 0: + if (inst == KVM_HYPERCALL_BIN) { + kvmppc_do_hypercall(vcpu); + advance = 0; /* kvmppc_do_hypercall handles the PC. */ + } else { + printk(KERN_ERRunknown op %d\n, get_op(inst)); + emulated = EMULATE_FAIL; + } + break; case 3: /* trap */ printk(trap!\n); kvmppc_queue_exception(vcpu, BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PROGRAM); diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h b/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h --- a/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h +++ b/include/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ #ifdef __KERNEL__ +#define KVM_HYPERCALL_BIN 0x03ff + static inline int kvm_para_available(void) { return 0; ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH 2/6] kvmppc: add hypercall infrastructure - host part
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:36:43AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Christian, A few comments diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c @@ -203,6 +203,24 @@ kvmppc_set_msr(vcpu, vcpu-arch.srr1); } +static int kvmppc_do_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int ret = 0; + + switch (vcpu-arch.gpr[0]) { + default: + printk(KERN_ERRunknown hypercall %d\n, vcpu-arch.gpr[0]); I think the preffered style is printk(KERN_ERR ...) You've made the same style mistake in most of you printk()'s in your other patches aswell. Yours Tony linux.conf.auhttp://www.marchsouth.org/ Jan 19 - 24 2009 The Australian Linux Technical Conference! ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev