Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: remove memblock_find_dma_reserve()

2024-03-20 Thread Baoquan He
On 03/20/24 at 11:36am, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 03:52:52PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 03/19/24 at 05:49pm, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > Hi Baoquan,
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:21:34PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > > This is not needed any more.
> > > 
> > > I'd swap this and the first patch, so that the first patch would remove
> > > memblock_find_dma_reserve() and it's changelog will explain why it's not
> > > needed and then the second patch will simply drop unused set_dma_reserve()
> > 
> > Thanks, Mike.
> > 
> > My thought on the patch 1/2 splitting is:
> > patch 1 is removing all relevant codes in mm, including the usage of
> > dma_reserve in free_area_init_core() and exporting set_dma_reserve()
> > to any ARCH which want to subtract the dma_reserve from DMA zone.
> >
> > Patch 2 purely remove the code in x86 ARCH about how to get dma_reserve.
>  
> I think it's better first to remove the usage of set_dma_reserve() in x86
> and then clean up the unused code.

OK, firslty remove the only user, that sounds reasonable. Will change.
Thanks.



Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: remove memblock_find_dma_reserve()

2024-03-20 Thread Mike Rapoport
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 03:52:52PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 03/19/24 at 05:49pm, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Hi Baoquan,
> > 
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:21:34PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > This is not needed any more.
> > 
> > I'd swap this and the first patch, so that the first patch would remove
> > memblock_find_dma_reserve() and it's changelog will explain why it's not
> > needed and then the second patch will simply drop unused set_dma_reserve()
> 
> Thanks, Mike.
> 
> My thought on the patch 1/2 splitting is:
> patch 1 is removing all relevant codes in mm, including the usage of
> dma_reserve in free_area_init_core() and exporting set_dma_reserve()
> to any ARCH which want to subtract the dma_reserve from DMA zone.
>
> Patch 2 purely remove the code in x86 ARCH about how to get dma_reserve.
 
I think it's better first to remove the usage of set_dma_reserve() in x86
and then clean up the unused code.

> Your suggestion is also good to me, I can rearrange the order and
> repost.

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: remove memblock_find_dma_reserve()

2024-03-20 Thread Baoquan He
On 03/19/24 at 05:49pm, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:21:34PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > This is not needed any more.
> 
> I'd swap this and the first patch, so that the first patch would remove
> memblock_find_dma_reserve() and it's changelog will explain why it's not
> needed and then the second patch will simply drop unused set_dma_reserve()

Thanks, Mike.

My thought on the patch 1/2 splitting is:
patch 1 is removing all relevant codes in mm, including the usage of
dma_reserve in free_area_init_core() and exporting set_dma_reserve()
to any ARCH which want to subtract the dma_reserve from DMA zone.

Patch 2 purely remove the code in x86 ARCH about how to get dma_reserve.

Your suggestion is also good to me, I can rearrange the order and
repost.



Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: remove memblock_find_dma_reserve()

2024-03-19 Thread Mike Rapoport
Hi Baoquan,

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:21:34PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> This is not needed any more.

I'd swap this and the first patch, so that the first patch would remove
memblock_find_dma_reserve() and it's changelog will explain why it's not
needed and then the second patch will simply drop unused set_dma_reserve()

> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He 
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |  1 -
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup.c|  2 --
>  arch/x86/mm/init.c | 45 --
>  3 files changed, 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 315535ffb258..cefc7a84f7a4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -1200,7 +1200,6 @@ static inline int pgd_none(pgd_t pgd)
>  extern int direct_gbpages;
>  void init_mem_mapping(void);
>  void early_alloc_pgt_buf(void);
> -extern void memblock_find_dma_reserve(void);
>  void __init poking_init(void);
>  unsigned long init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
> unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 3e1e96efadfe..5aa00938051f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -1106,8 +1106,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>*/
>   arch_reserve_crashkernel();
>  
> - memblock_find_dma_reserve();
> -
>   if (!early_xdbc_setup_hardware())
>   early_xdbc_register_console();
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> index 5209549e8192..615f0bf4bda6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
> @@ -990,51 +990,6 @@ void __init free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, 
> unsigned long end)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> -/*
> - * Calculate the precise size of the DMA zone (first 16 MB of RAM),
> - * and pass it to the MM layer - to help it set zone watermarks more
> - * accurately.
> - *
> - * Done on 64-bit systems only for the time being, although 32-bit systems
> - * might benefit from this as well.
> - */
> -void __init memblock_find_dma_reserve(void)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - u64 nr_pages = 0, nr_free_pages = 0;
> - unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
> - phys_addr_t start_addr, end_addr;
> - int i;
> - u64 u;
> -
> - /*
> -  * Iterate over all memory ranges (free and reserved ones alike),
> -  * to calculate the total number of pages in the first 16 MB of RAM:
> -  */
> - nr_pages = 0;
> - for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, _pfn, _pfn, NULL) {
> - start_pfn = min(start_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
> - end_pfn   = min(end_pfn,   MAX_DMA_PFN);
> -
> - nr_pages += end_pfn - start_pfn;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> -  * Iterate over free memory ranges to calculate the number of free
> -  * pages in the DMA zone, while not counting potential partial
> -  * pages at the beginning or the end of the range:
> -  */
> - nr_free_pages = 0;
> - for_each_free_mem_range(u, NUMA_NO_NODE, MEMBLOCK_NONE, _addr, 
> _addr, NULL) {
> - start_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, PFN_UP(start_addr), 
> MAX_DMA_PFN);
> - end_pfn   = min_t(unsigned long, PFN_DOWN(end_addr), 
> MAX_DMA_PFN);
> -
> - if (start_pfn < end_pfn)
> - nr_free_pages += end_pfn - start_pfn;
> - }
> -#endif
> -}
> -
>  void __init zone_sizes_init(void)
>  {
>   unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


[PATCH 2/6] x86: remove memblock_find_dma_reserve()

2024-03-18 Thread Baoquan He
This is not needed any more.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He 
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c|  2 --
 arch/x86/mm/init.c | 45 --
 3 files changed, 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 315535ffb258..cefc7a84f7a4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -1200,7 +1200,6 @@ static inline int pgd_none(pgd_t pgd)
 extern int direct_gbpages;
 void init_mem_mapping(void);
 void early_alloc_pgt_buf(void);
-extern void memblock_find_dma_reserve(void);
 void __init poking_init(void);
 unsigned long init_memory_mapping(unsigned long start,
  unsigned long end, pgprot_t prot);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 3e1e96efadfe..5aa00938051f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1106,8 +1106,6 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 */
arch_reserve_crashkernel();
 
-   memblock_find_dma_reserve();
-
if (!early_xdbc_setup_hardware())
early_xdbc_register_console();
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index 5209549e8192..615f0bf4bda6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -990,51 +990,6 @@ void __init free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned 
long end)
 }
 #endif
 
-/*
- * Calculate the precise size of the DMA zone (first 16 MB of RAM),
- * and pass it to the MM layer - to help it set zone watermarks more
- * accurately.
- *
- * Done on 64-bit systems only for the time being, although 32-bit systems
- * might benefit from this as well.
- */
-void __init memblock_find_dma_reserve(void)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-   u64 nr_pages = 0, nr_free_pages = 0;
-   unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn;
-   phys_addr_t start_addr, end_addr;
-   int i;
-   u64 u;
-
-   /*
-* Iterate over all memory ranges (free and reserved ones alike),
-* to calculate the total number of pages in the first 16 MB of RAM:
-*/
-   nr_pages = 0;
-   for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, _pfn, _pfn, NULL) {
-   start_pfn = min(start_pfn, MAX_DMA_PFN);
-   end_pfn   = min(end_pfn,   MAX_DMA_PFN);
-
-   nr_pages += end_pfn - start_pfn;
-   }
-
-   /*
-* Iterate over free memory ranges to calculate the number of free
-* pages in the DMA zone, while not counting potential partial
-* pages at the beginning or the end of the range:
-*/
-   nr_free_pages = 0;
-   for_each_free_mem_range(u, NUMA_NO_NODE, MEMBLOCK_NONE, _addr, 
_addr, NULL) {
-   start_pfn = min_t(unsigned long, PFN_UP(start_addr), 
MAX_DMA_PFN);
-   end_pfn   = min_t(unsigned long, PFN_DOWN(end_addr), 
MAX_DMA_PFN);
-
-   if (start_pfn < end_pfn)
-   nr_free_pages += end_pfn - start_pfn;
-   }
-#endif
-}
-
 void __init zone_sizes_init(void)
 {
unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES];
-- 
2.41.0