Re: [PATCH 4/6] hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events

2011-07-04 Thread K.Prasad
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:52:25PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
 The breakpoint support ability in an arch is not related
 to the fact perf events is built or not. HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
 only shows an ability so this dependency makes no sense
 anymore. Archs that select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT already
 ensure that perf event is built.
 
 Remove that dependency.
 
 Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
 Cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu
 Cc: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl
 Cc: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
 Cc: Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
 Cc: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
 ---
  arch/Kconfig |1 -
  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
 index f78c2be..ce4be89 100644
 --- a/arch/Kconfig
 +++ b/arch/Kconfig
 @@ -149,7 +149,6 @@ config HAVE_DEFAULT_NO_SPIN_MUTEXES
 
  config HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
   bool
 - depends on PERF_EVENTS
 
  config HAVE_MIXED_BREAKPOINTS_REGS
   bool
 -- 

Just a thought you might want to consider...

The need to keep the ability (HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) and the user-choice to
enable hardware breakpoints (through HW_BREAKPOINT) in separate config
options isn't very clear to me (and is a bit confusing with very similar
names).

Why not make HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT selectable by the user (which in turn
would turn on PERF_EVENTS) for a given architecture?

Thanks,
K.Prasad

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Re: [PATCH 4/6] hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events

2011-07-04 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:02:23PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
 On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:52:25PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
  The breakpoint support ability in an arch is not related
  to the fact perf events is built or not. HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
  only shows an ability so this dependency makes no sense
  anymore. Archs that select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT already
  ensure that perf event is built.
  
  Remove that dependency.
  
  Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
  Cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu
  Cc: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl
  Cc: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
  Cc: Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
  Cc: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
  ---
   arch/Kconfig |1 -
   1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
  
  diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
  index f78c2be..ce4be89 100644
  --- a/arch/Kconfig
  +++ b/arch/Kconfig
  @@ -149,7 +149,6 @@ config HAVE_DEFAULT_NO_SPIN_MUTEXES
  
   config HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
  bool
  -   depends on PERF_EVENTS
  
   config HAVE_MIXED_BREAKPOINTS_REGS
  bool
  -- 
 
 Just a thought you might want to consider...
 
 The need to keep the ability (HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) and the user-choice to
 enable hardware breakpoints (through HW_BREAKPOINT) in separate config
 options isn't very clear to me (and is a bit confusing with very similar
 names).
 
 Why not make HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT selectable by the user (which in turn
 would turn on PERF_EVENTS) for a given architecture?

But then how kconfig knows if the allows that? You need to know if the
arch has the ability to support breakpoints.

This is a commin pattern in Linux Kconfig. Things are often seperated between
ability (some constant value provided by the arch) and the user choice that
depends on that ability.
The advantage of doing this is that you can centralize the generic dependencies,
help menu, etc... into a single place.
 
 Thanks,
 K.Prasad
 
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


[PATCH 4/6] hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events

2011-05-24 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
The breakpoint support ability in an arch is not related
to the fact perf events is built or not. HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
only shows an ability so this dependency makes no sense
anymore. Archs that select HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT already
ensure that perf event is built.

Remove that dependency.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu
Cc: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl
Cc: Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
Cc: Prasad pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Paul Mundt let...@linux-sh.org
---
 arch/Kconfig |1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index f78c2be..ce4be89 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -149,7 +149,6 @@ config HAVE_DEFAULT_NO_SPIN_MUTEXES
 
 config HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
bool
-   depends on PERF_EVENTS
 
 config HAVE_MIXED_BREAKPOINTS_REGS
bool
-- 
1.7.3.2

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev