Use the new "raw" of_get_next_child() variant so all device tree nodes
will appear in procfs.

Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollis_blanch...@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <deepak_sax...@mentor.com>
---
 fs/proc/proc_devtree.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
index d9396a4..aa914eb 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np,
        const char *p;
 
        set_node_proc_entry(np, de);
-       for (child = NULL; (child = of_get_next_child(np, child));) {
+       for (child = NULL; (child = _of_get_next_child(np, child));) {
                /* Use everything after the last slash, or the full name */
                p = strrchr(child->full_name, '/');
                if (!p)
-- 
1.6.3.3
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to