RE: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and T4240QDS

2013-09-08 Thread Jia Hongtao-B38951
Great thanks.

I will update the patch and send it soon.

-Hongtao

 -Original Message-
 From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-
 bounces+b38951=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Kumar Gala
 Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 12:10 AM
 To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
 Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
 wei.y...@windriver.com
 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and
 T4240QDS
 
 
 On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
  Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:41 AM
  To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
  Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
  wei.y...@windriver.com
  Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4
  and T4240QDS
 
 
  On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
 
  In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
  The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
 
  Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao hongtao@freescale.com
  ---
  V2 change log:
  Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right
  topology.
 
  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi   | 49 +---
  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67
  ++-
  ---
  2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
 
  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
  b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
  index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
  --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
  +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
  @@ -120,25 +120,36 @@
};
 
i2c@118000 {
  - eeprom@50 {
  - compatible = at24,24c64;
  - reg = 0x50;
  - };
  - eeprom@51 {
  - compatible = at24,24c256;
  - reg = 0x51;
  - };
  - eeprom@53 {
  - compatible = at24,24c256;
  - reg = 0x53;
  - };
  - eeprom@57 {
  - compatible = at24,24c256;
  - reg = 0x57;
  - };
  - rtc@68 {
  - compatible = dallas,ds3232;
  - reg = 0x68;
  + pca9547@77 {
  + compatible = philips,pca9547;
 
  We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.
 
 This is based on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
 
 
  + reg = 0x77;
  + #address-cells = 1;
  + #size-cells = 0;
  + channel@0 {
 
  channel should probably be i2c
 
 
  Is there any standard for the name?
  i2c is ok but I think channel is more intuitional.
 
  Hi Scott,
  What do you think of it.
 
 Basing my comments on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt
 
 
 
  Thanks.
  -Hongtao
 
 
 
  [same comments below]
 
  + #address-cells = 1;
  + #size-cells = 0;
  + reg = 0;
  + eeprom@50 {
  + compatible = at24,24c64;
  + reg = 0x50;
  + };
  + eeprom@51 {
  + compatible = at24,24c256;
  + reg = 0x51;
  + };
  + eeprom@53 {
  + compatible = at24,24c256;
  + reg = 0x53;
  + };
  + eeprom@57 {
  + compatible = at24,24c256;
  + reg = 0x57;
  + };
  + rtc@68 {
  + compatible = dallas,ds3232;
  + reg = 0x68;
  + };
  + };
};
};
 
  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
  b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
  index 0555976..ae68595 100644
  --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
  +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
  @@ -118,34 +118,45 @@
};
 
i2c@118000 {
  - eeprom@51 {
  - compatible = at24,24c256;
  - reg = 0x51;
  - };
  - eeprom@52 {
  - compatible = at24,24c256;
  - reg = 0x52;
  - };
  - eeprom@53

Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and T4240QDS

2013-09-06 Thread Kumar Gala

On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
 Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:41 AM
 To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
 wei.y...@windriver.com
 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and
 T4240QDS
 
 
 On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
 
 In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
 The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
 
 Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao hongtao@freescale.com
 ---
 V2 change log:
 Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right
 topology.
 
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi   | 49 +---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 ++-
 ---
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 @@ -120,25 +120,36 @@
 };
 
 i2c@118000 {
 -   eeprom@50 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c64;
 -   reg = 0x50;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@51 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x51;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@53 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x53;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@57 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x57;
 -   };
 -   rtc@68 {
 -   compatible = dallas,ds3232;
 -   reg = 0x68;
 +   pca9547@77 {
 +   compatible = philips,pca9547;
 
 We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.

This is based on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt

 
 +   reg = 0x77;
 +   #address-cells = 1;
 +   #size-cells = 0;
 +   channel@0 {
 
 channel should probably be i2c
 
 
 Is there any standard for the name?
 i2c is ok but I think channel is more intuitional.
 
 Hi Scott,
 What do you think of it.

Basing my comments on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt 


 
 Thanks.
 -Hongtao
 
 
 
 [same comments below]
 
 +   #address-cells = 1;
 +   #size-cells = 0;
 +   reg = 0;
 +   eeprom@50 {
 +   compatible = at24,24c64;
 +   reg = 0x50;
 +   };
 +   eeprom@51 {
 +   compatible = at24,24c256;
 +   reg = 0x51;
 +   };
 +   eeprom@53 {
 +   compatible = at24,24c256;
 +   reg = 0x53;
 +   };
 +   eeprom@57 {
 +   compatible = at24,24c256;
 +   reg = 0x57;
 +   };
 +   rtc@68 {
 +   compatible = dallas,ds3232;
 +   reg = 0x68;
 +   };
 +   };
 };
 };
 
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 index 0555976..ae68595 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 @@ -118,34 +118,45 @@
 };
 
 i2c@118000 {
 -   eeprom@51 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x51;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@52 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x52;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@53 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x53;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@54 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x54;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@55 {
 -   compatible = at24,24c256;
 -   reg = 0x55;
 -   };
 -   eeprom@56

Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and T4240QDS

2013-09-05 Thread Kumar Gala

On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:

 In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
 The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
 
 Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao hongtao@freescale.com
 ---
 V2 change log:
 Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right topology.
 
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi   | 49 +---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 ++
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi 
 b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 @@ -120,25 +120,36 @@
   };
 
   i2c@118000 {
 - eeprom@50 {
 - compatible = at24,24c64;
 - reg = 0x50;
 - };
 - eeprom@51 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x51;
 - };
 - eeprom@53 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x53;
 - };
 - eeprom@57 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x57;
 - };
 - rtc@68 {
 - compatible = dallas,ds3232;
 - reg = 0x68;
 + pca9547@77 {
 + compatible = philips,pca9547;

We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.

 + reg = 0x77;
 + #address-cells = 1;
 + #size-cells = 0;
 + channel@0 {

channel should probably be i2c

[same comments below]

 + #address-cells = 1;
 + #size-cells = 0;
 + reg = 0;
 + eeprom@50 {
 + compatible = at24,24c64;
 + reg = 0x50;
 + };
 + eeprom@51 {
 + compatible = at24,24c256;
 + reg = 0x51;
 + };
 + eeprom@53 {
 + compatible = at24,24c256;
 + reg = 0x53;
 + };
 + eeprom@57 {
 + compatible = at24,24c256;
 + reg = 0x57;
 + };
 + rtc@68 {
 + compatible = dallas,ds3232;
 + reg = 0x68;
 + };
 + };
   };
   };
 
 diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts 
 b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 index 0555976..ae68595 100644
 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 @@ -118,34 +118,45 @@
   };
 
   i2c@118000 {
 - eeprom@51 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x51;
 - };
 - eeprom@52 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x52;
 - };
 - eeprom@53 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x53;
 - };
 - eeprom@54 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x54;
 - };
 - eeprom@55 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x55;
 - };
 - eeprom@56 {
 - compatible = at24,24c256;
 - reg = 0x56;
 - };
 - rtc@68 {
 - compatible = dallas,ds3232;
 - reg = 0x68;
 - interrupts = 0x1 0x1 0 0;
 + pca9547@77 {
 + compatible = philips,pca9547;
 + reg = 0x77;
 + #address-cells = 1;
 +

RE: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and T4240QDS

2013-09-05 Thread Jia Hongtao-B38951
 -Original Message-
 From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
 Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:41 AM
 To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
 wei.y...@windriver.com
 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and
 T4240QDS
 
 
 On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
 
  In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
  The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
 
  Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao hongtao@freescale.com
  ---
  V2 change log:
  Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right
 topology.
 
  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi   | 49 +---
  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 ++-
 ---
  2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
 
  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
 b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
  index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
  --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
  +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
  @@ -120,25 +120,36 @@
  };
 
  i2c@118000 {
  -   eeprom@50 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c64;
  -   reg = 0x50;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@51 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x51;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@53 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x53;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@57 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x57;
  -   };
  -   rtc@68 {
  -   compatible = dallas,ds3232;
  -   reg = 0x68;
  +   pca9547@77 {
  +   compatible = philips,pca9547;
 
 We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.
 
  +   reg = 0x77;
  +   #address-cells = 1;
  +   #size-cells = 0;
  +   channel@0 {
 
 channel should probably be i2c


Is there any standard for the name?
i2c is ok but I think channel is more intuitional.

Hi Scott,
What do you think of it.

Thanks.
-Hongtao


 
 [same comments below]
 
  +   #address-cells = 1;
  +   #size-cells = 0;
  +   reg = 0;
  +   eeprom@50 {
  +   compatible = at24,24c64;
  +   reg = 0x50;
  +   };
  +   eeprom@51 {
  +   compatible = at24,24c256;
  +   reg = 0x51;
  +   };
  +   eeprom@53 {
  +   compatible = at24,24c256;
  +   reg = 0x53;
  +   };
  +   eeprom@57 {
  +   compatible = at24,24c256;
  +   reg = 0x57;
  +   };
  +   rtc@68 {
  +   compatible = dallas,ds3232;
  +   reg = 0x68;
  +   };
  +   };
  };
  };
 
  diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
 b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
  index 0555976..ae68595 100644
  --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
  +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
  @@ -118,34 +118,45 @@
  };
 
  i2c@118000 {
  -   eeprom@51 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x51;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@52 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x52;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@53 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x53;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@54 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x54;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@55 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x55;
  -   };
  -   eeprom@56 {
  -   compatible = at24,24c256;
  -   reg = 0x56

[PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and T4240QDS

2013-09-04 Thread Jia Hongtao
In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.

Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao hongtao@freescale.com
---
V2 change log:
Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right topology.

 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi   | 49 +---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 ++
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
@@ -120,25 +120,36 @@
};
 
i2c@118000 {
-   eeprom@50 {
-   compatible = at24,24c64;
-   reg = 0x50;
-   };
-   eeprom@51 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x51;
-   };
-   eeprom@53 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x53;
-   };
-   eeprom@57 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x57;
-   };
-   rtc@68 {
-   compatible = dallas,ds3232;
-   reg = 0x68;
+   pca9547@77 {
+   compatible = philips,pca9547;
+   reg = 0x77;
+   #address-cells = 1;
+   #size-cells = 0;
+   channel@0 {
+   #address-cells = 1;
+   #size-cells = 0;
+   reg = 0;
+   eeprom@50 {
+   compatible = at24,24c64;
+   reg = 0x50;
+   };
+   eeprom@51 {
+   compatible = at24,24c256;
+   reg = 0x51;
+   };
+   eeprom@53 {
+   compatible = at24,24c256;
+   reg = 0x53;
+   };
+   eeprom@57 {
+   compatible = at24,24c256;
+   reg = 0x57;
+   };
+   rtc@68 {
+   compatible = dallas,ds3232;
+   reg = 0x68;
+   };
+   };
};
};
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts 
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
index 0555976..ae68595 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
@@ -118,34 +118,45 @@
};
 
i2c@118000 {
-   eeprom@51 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x51;
-   };
-   eeprom@52 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x52;
-   };
-   eeprom@53 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x53;
-   };
-   eeprom@54 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x54;
-   };
-   eeprom@55 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x55;
-   };
-   eeprom@56 {
-   compatible = at24,24c256;
-   reg = 0x56;
-   };
-   rtc@68 {
-   compatible = dallas,ds3232;
-   reg = 0x68;
-   interrupts = 0x1 0x1 0 0;
+   pca9547@77 {
+   compatible = philips,pca9547;
+   reg = 0x77;
+   #address-cells = 1;
+   #size-cells = 0;
+   channel@0 {
+