Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:23:39AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:53 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
> >
> > The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> > avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
> >
> > Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> > devices.
> >
> > Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > v2: Update the device name format
> > ---
> > drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init
> > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> > struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> > struct platform_device *dev;
> > - int display_number = 1;
> > + int display_number = 0;
> > + char buf[14];
> > + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
>
> static const as suggested and can we just move on please...
Only const, static could be dodgy
> > int ret;
> >
> > /* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
> > @@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init
> > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
> > !of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display",
> > NULL))
> > continue;
> > - dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
> > NULL);
> > + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> > display_number++);
>
> The boot display is always "of-display.0". Just use the fixed string
> here. Then we can get rid of the whole debate around static const.
I prefer to use the same format string when the names should be
consistent. Also it would resurrect the starting from 1 debate.
But if you really want to have two strings I do not care all that much.
>
> > + if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> > + continue;
>
> This only happens if display_number becomes too big. Why continue on?
> The next iteration will fail too.
Yes, there is no need to continue with the loop.
Thanks
Michal
>
> > + dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
> > if (WARN_ON(!dev))
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > boot_display = node;
> > @@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init
> > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > }
> >
> > for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
> > - char *buf[14];
> > if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
> > node == boot_display)
> > continue;
> > - ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d",
> > display_number++);
> > + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> > display_number++);
> > if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> > continue;
>
> Here too in the original change.
>
> > of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
> > --
> > 2.35.3
> >
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:53 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
>
> Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> devices.
>
> Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> ---
> v2: Update the device name format
> ---
> drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> struct platform_device *dev;
> - int display_number = 1;
> + int display_number = 0;
> + char buf[14];
> + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
static const as suggested and can we just move on please...
> int ret;
>
> /* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
> @@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
> !of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display",
> NULL))
> continue;
> - dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
> NULL);
> + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> display_number++);
The boot display is always "of-display.0". Just use the fixed string
here. Then we can get rid of the whole debate around static const.
> + if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> + continue;
This only happens if display_number becomes too big. Why continue on?
The next iteration will fail too.
> + dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
> if (WARN_ON(!dev))
> return -ENOMEM;
> boot_display = node;
> @@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> }
>
> for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
> - char *buf[14];
> if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
> node == boot_display)
> continue;
> - ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d",
> display_number++);
> + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> display_number++);
> if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> continue;
Here too in the original change.
> of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
> --
> 2.35.3
>
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:34:46AM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:24:07AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
> > > The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> > > avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
> > >
> > > Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> > > devices.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > > ---
> > > v2: Update the device name format
> > > ---
> > > drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init
> > > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> > > struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> > > struct platform_device *dev;
> > > - int display_number = 1;
> > > + int display_number = 0;
> > > + char buf[14];
> >
> > Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
>
> No, there are two for blocks.
>
> >
> > > + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
> >
> > Should be const ?
>
> Yes, could be.
>
> >
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > /* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec
> > > */
> > > @@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init
> > > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > > if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened",
> > > NULL) ||
> > > !of_get_property(node,
> > > "linux,boot-display", NULL))
> > > continue;
> > > - dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
> > > NULL);
> > > + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> > > display_number++);
> > > + if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> > > + continue;
> >
> >
> > Can you make buf big enough to avoid that ?
>
> It would be a bit fragile that way.
>
> The buffer would have to theoretically accomodate
> "of-display.-9223372036854775808", and any change to the format requires
> recalculating the length, by hand.
>
> Of course, the memory would run out way before allocating that many
> devices so it's kind of pointless to try and accomodate all possible
> device numbers.
>
> >
> > And by the way could it be called something else than 'buf' ?
> >
> > See exemple here :
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1/source/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c#L690
>
> Yes, that is quite possible. Nonetheless, just like 'ret' generic
> variable names also work.
And in fact judicious use of short generic variable names is more
readeable than naming all variables foobar_* as far as I am concerned.
Of course, YMMV.
Thanks
Michal
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:39:23PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 20.01.23 um 12:27 schrieb Michal Suchánek:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 04:20:57PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am 19.01.23 um 14:23 schrieb Michal Suchánek:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > > > Hi
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 19.01.23 um 11:24 schrieb Christophe Leroy:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
> > > > > > > The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > > > > > breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> > > > > > > avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> > > > > > > devices.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > v2: Update the device name format
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > > > > > index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > > > > > @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init
> > > > > > > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > > > > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> > > > > > > struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> > > > > > > struct platform_device *dev;
> > > > > > > - int display_number = 1;
> > > > > > > + int display_number = 0;
> > > > > > > + char buf[14];
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should be const ?
> > > > >
> > > > > That should be static const of_display_format[] = then
> > > >
> > > > Why? It sounds completely fine to have a const pointer to a string
> > > > constatnt.
> > >
> > > Generally speaking:
> > >
> > > 'static' because your const pointer is then not a local variable, so it
> > > takes pressure off the stack. For global variables, you don't want them to
> > > show up in any linker symbol tables.
> >
> > This sounds a lot like an exemplar case of premature optimization.
> > A simplistic compiler might do exactly what you say, and allocate a slot
> > for the variable on the stack the moment the function is entered.
> >
> > However, in real compilers there is no stack pressure from having a
> > local variable:
> > - the compiler can put the variable into a register
> > - it can completely omit the variable before and after it's actually
> > used which is that specific function call
> >
> > > The string "of-display.%d" is stored as an array in the ELF data section.
> > > And your char pointer is a reference to that array. For static pointers,
> > > these indirections take CPU cycles to update when the loader has to
> > > relocate
> >
> > Provided that the char pointer ever exists in the compiled code. Its
> > address is not taken so it does not need to.
> >
> > > sections. If you declare of_display_format[] directly as array, you avoid
> > > the reference and work directly with the array.
> > >
> > > Of course, this is a kernel module and the string is self-contained within
> > > the function. So the compiler can probably detect that and optimize the
> > > code
> > > to be like the 'static const []' version. It's still good to follow best
> > > practices, as someone might copy from this function.
> >
> > If it could not detect it there would be a lot of trouble all around.
>
> The issues definitely exist in userspace code. Kernel modules are simpler,
> so compiler optimization is easier.
>
> But I'm not really trying to make a technical argument. My point here is
> that someone might read your code and duplicate the pattern. That's not
> unreasonable: it's core Linux code, so it can be assumed to be good (or at
> least not bad). But your current code teaches the reader a bad practices,
> which should be avoided. It is better to do the correct thing, even if it
> makes no difference to the compiled code.
The point I am trying to get across is that besides the original
objection about missing 'const' this code is not bad. Loading a string
constant address into a local variable and passing it as function call
argument is perfectly fine.
If you get any advantage by the alternate convoluted construct it's
more likely than anything else a bug in the compiler you are using.
It may be necessary to work around such bugs in performance-critical
code but not in driver probing code that runs exactly once during boot.
Thanks
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Hi
Am 20.01.23 um 12:27 schrieb Michal Suchánek:
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 04:20:57PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 19.01.23 um 14:23 schrieb Michal Suchánek:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 19.01.23 um 11:24 schrieb Christophe Leroy:
Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
devices.
Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
---
v2: Update the device name format
---
drivers/of/platform.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
struct platform_device *dev;
- int display_number = 1;
+ int display_number = 0;
+ char buf[14];
Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
+ char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
Should be const ?
That should be static const of_display_format[] = then
Why? It sounds completely fine to have a const pointer to a string
constatnt.
Generally speaking:
'static' because your const pointer is then not a local variable, so it
takes pressure off the stack. For global variables, you don't want them to
show up in any linker symbol tables.
This sounds a lot like an exemplar case of premature optimization.
A simplistic compiler might do exactly what you say, and allocate a slot
for the variable on the stack the moment the function is entered.
However, in real compilers there is no stack pressure from having a
local variable:
- the compiler can put the variable into a register
- it can completely omit the variable before and after it's actually
used which is that specific function call
The string "of-display.%d" is stored as an array in the ELF data section.
And your char pointer is a reference to that array. For static pointers,
these indirections take CPU cycles to update when the loader has to relocate
Provided that the char pointer ever exists in the compiled code. Its
address is not taken so it does not need to.
sections. If you declare of_display_format[] directly as array, you avoid
the reference and work directly with the array.
Of course, this is a kernel module and the string is self-contained within
the function. So the compiler can probably detect that and optimize the code
to be like the 'static const []' version. It's still good to follow best
practices, as someone might copy from this function.
If it could not detect it there would be a lot of trouble all around.
The issues definitely exist in userspace code. Kernel modules are
simpler, so compiler optimization is easier.
But I'm not really trying to make a technical argument. My point here is
that someone might read your code and duplicate the pattern. That's not
unreasonable: it's core Linux code, so it can be assumed to be good (or
at least not bad). But your current code teaches the reader a bad
practices, which should be avoided. It is better to do the correct
thing, even if it makes no difference to the compiled code.
Best regards
Thomas
Thanks
Michal
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 04:20:57PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 19.01.23 um 14:23 schrieb Michal Suchánek:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Am 19.01.23 um 11:24 schrieb Christophe Leroy:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
> > > > > The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > > > breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> > > > > avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> > > > > devices.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v2: Update the device name format
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> > > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > > > index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > > > @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init
> > > > > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > > > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> > > > > struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> > > > > struct platform_device *dev;
> > > > > - int display_number = 1;
> > > > > + int display_number = 0;
> > > > > + char buf[14];
> > > >
> > > > Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
> > > >
> > > > > + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
> > > >
> > > > Should be const ?
> > >
> > > That should be static const of_display_format[] = then
> >
> > Why? It sounds completely fine to have a const pointer to a string
> > constatnt.
>
> Generally speaking:
>
> 'static' because your const pointer is then not a local variable, so it
> takes pressure off the stack. For global variables, you don't want them to
> show up in any linker symbol tables.
This sounds a lot like an exemplar case of premature optimization.
A simplistic compiler might do exactly what you say, and allocate a slot
for the variable on the stack the moment the function is entered.
However, in real compilers there is no stack pressure from having a
local variable:
- the compiler can put the variable into a register
- it can completely omit the variable before and after it's actually
used which is that specific function call
> The string "of-display.%d" is stored as an array in the ELF data section.
> And your char pointer is a reference to that array. For static pointers,
> these indirections take CPU cycles to update when the loader has to relocate
Provided that the char pointer ever exists in the compiled code. Its
address is not taken so it does not need to.
> sections. If you declare of_display_format[] directly as array, you avoid
> the reference and work directly with the array.
>
> Of course, this is a kernel module and the string is self-contained within
> the function. So the compiler can probably detect that and optimize the code
> to be like the 'static const []' version. It's still good to follow best
> practices, as someone might copy from this function.
If it could not detect it there would be a lot of trouble all around.
Thanks
Michal
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Hi
Am 19.01.23 um 14:23 schrieb Michal Suchánek:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 19.01.23 um 11:24 schrieb Christophe Leroy:
Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
devices.
Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
---
v2: Update the device name format
---
drivers/of/platform.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
struct platform_device *dev;
- int display_number = 1;
+ int display_number = 0;
+ char buf[14];
Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
+ char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
Should be const ?
That should be static const of_display_format[] = then
Why? It sounds completely fine to have a const pointer to a string
constatnt.
Generally speaking:
'static' because your const pointer is then not a local variable, so it
takes pressure off the stack. For global variables, you don't want them
to show up in any linker symbol tables.
The string "of-display.%d" is stored as an array in the ELF data
section. And your char pointer is a reference to that array. For static
pointers, these indirections take CPU cycles to update when the loader
has to relocate sections. If you declare of_display_format[] directly as
array, you avoid the reference and work directly with the array.
Of course, this is a kernel module and the string is self-contained
within the function. So the compiler can probably detect that and
optimize the code to be like the 'static const []' version. It's still
good to follow best practices, as someone might copy from this function.
Best regards
Thomas
Thanks
Michal
int ret;
/* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
@@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
!of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL))
continue;
- dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
NULL);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
+ if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
+ continue;
Can you make buf big enough to avoid that ?
And by the way could it be called something else than 'buf' ?
See exemple here :
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1/source/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c#L690
+ dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
if (WARN_ON(!dev))
return -ENOMEM;
boot_display = node;
@@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
}
for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
- char *buf[14];
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
node == boot_display)
continue;
- ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d", display_number++);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
continue;
of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:53 AM Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
>
> Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> devices.
>
> Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> ---
> v2: Update the device name format
> ---
> drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
As this is the only fix I have queued, if you respin, send the
original fix with fixes squashed.
Rob
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 19.01.23 um 11:24 schrieb Christophe Leroy:
> >
> >
> > Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
> > > The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> > > avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
> > >
> > > Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> > > devices.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > > ---
> > > v2: Update the device name format
> > > ---
> > >drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> > >1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > > @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init
> > > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> > > struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> > > struct platform_device *dev;
> > > - int display_number = 1;
> > > + int display_number = 0;
> > > + char buf[14];
> >
> > Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
> >
> > > + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
> >
> > Should be const ?
>
> That should be static const of_display_format[] = then
Why? It sounds completely fine to have a const pointer to a string
constatnt.
Thanks
Michal
>
> >
> > > int ret;
> > > /* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec
> > > */
> > > @@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init
> > > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > > if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened",
> > > NULL) ||
> > > !of_get_property(node,
> > > "linux,boot-display", NULL))
> > > continue;
> > > - dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
> > > NULL);
> > > + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> > > display_number++);
> > > + if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> > > + continue;
> >
> >
> > Can you make buf big enough to avoid that ?
> >
> > And by the way could it be called something else than 'buf' ?
> >
> > See exemple here :
> > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1/source/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c#L690
> >
> >
> > > + dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
> > > if (WARN_ON(!dev))
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > boot_display = node;
> > > @@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init
> > > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > > }
> > > for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
> > > - char *buf[14];
> > > if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened",
> > > NULL) || node == boot_display)
> > > continue;
> > > - ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d", display_number++);
> > > + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> > > display_number++);
> > > if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> > > continue;
> > > of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
>
> --
> Thomas Zimmermann
> Graphics Driver Developer
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
> Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Hi
Am 19.01.23 um 11:24 schrieb Christophe Leroy:
Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
devices.
Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
---
v2: Update the device name format
---
drivers/of/platform.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
struct platform_device *dev;
- int display_number = 1;
+ int display_number = 0;
+ char buf[14];
Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
+ char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
Should be const ?
That should be static const of_display_format[] = then
int ret;
/* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
@@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
!of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL))
continue;
- dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
NULL);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
+ if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
+ continue;
Can you make buf big enough to avoid that ?
And by the way could it be called something else than 'buf' ?
See exemple here :
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1/source/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c#L690
+ dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
if (WARN_ON(!dev))
return -ENOMEM;
boot_display = node;
@@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
}
for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
- char *buf[14];
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
node == boot_display)
continue;
- ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d", display_number++);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
continue;
of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:53:23 +0100
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
>
> Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> devices.
>
> Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> ---
> v2: Update the device name format
Hi Michal!
Just tested your 'of: Make of framebuffer devices unique' + 'v2 of: Fix of
platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code' on my G4 and can confirm
they fix the original issue
(https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216095). Thanks!
Also ofdrm gets loaded now without error messages:
# modprobe -v ofdrm
insmod
/lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/video/fbdev/core/cfbcopyarea.ko
insmod
/lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysimgblt.ko
insmod
/lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/video/fbdev/core/sysfillrect.ko
insmod
/lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/video/fbdev/core/cfbimgblt.ko
insmod
/lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/video/fbdev/core/syscopyarea.ko
insmod
/lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/video/fbdev/core/cfbfillrect.ko
insmod /lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_kms_helper.ko
insmod
/lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_shmem_helper.ko
insmod /lib/modules/6.2.0-rc4-PMacG4+/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/ofdrm.ko
However I get no monitor output yet, despite ofdrm is loaded:
# lsmod | grep -i drm
ofdrm 9736 0
drm_shmem_helper5704 1 ofdrm
drm_kms_helper101736 1 ofdrm
cfbfillrect 2896 1 drm_kms_helper
syscopyarea 2400 1 drm_kms_helper
cfbimgblt 2256 1 drm_kms_helper
sysfillrect 2920 1 drm_kms_helper
sysimgblt 2296 1 drm_kms_helper
cfbcopyarea 2376 1 drm_kms_helper
drm 288960 3 drm_shmem_helper,ofdrm,drm_kms_helper
drm_panel_orientation_quirks 16 1 drm
I use DRM [=m], DRM_OFDRM [=m], DRM_RADEON [=n], DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION [=y], FB
[=y] and FB_OF [=n] in my kernel test .config. As far as I understand
DRM_OFDRM and FB_OF would be mutually exclusive? Also does not seem to make a
difference whether FB_SIMPLE [=y] is set.
Regards,
Erhard
dmesg_62-rc4_g4
Description: Binary data
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:24:07AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
> > The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> > avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
> >
> > Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> > devices.
> >
> > Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> > ---
> > v2: Update the device name format
> > ---
> > drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> > @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init
> > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> > struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> > struct platform_device *dev;
> > - int display_number = 1;
> > + int display_number = 0;
> > + char buf[14];
>
> Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
No, there are two for blocks.
>
> > + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
>
> Should be const ?
Yes, could be.
>
> > int ret;
> >
> > /* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
> > @@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init
> > of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> > if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
> > !of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL))
> > continue;
> > - dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
> > NULL);
> > + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> > display_number++);
> > + if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> > + continue;
>
>
> Can you make buf big enough to avoid that ?
It would be a bit fragile that way.
The buffer would have to theoretically accomodate
"of-display.-9223372036854775808", and any change to the format requires
recalculating the length, by hand.
Of course, the memory would run out way before allocating that many
devices so it's kind of pointless to try and accomodate all possible
device numbers.
>
> And by the way could it be called something else than 'buf' ?
>
> See exemple here :
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1/source/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c#L690
Yes, that is quite possible. Nonetheless, just like 'ret' generic
variable names also work.
Thanks
Michal
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Le 19/01/2023 à 10:53, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
> The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
> avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
>
> Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
> devices.
>
> Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
> ---
> v2: Update the device name format
> ---
> drivers/of/platform.c | 12
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
> struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
> struct platform_device *dev;
> - int display_number = 1;
> + int display_number = 0;
> + char buf[14];
Can you declare that in the for block where it is used instead ?
> + char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
Should be const ?
> int ret;
>
> /* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
> @@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
> !of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL))
> continue;
> - dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
> NULL);
> + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> display_number++);
> + if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> + continue;
Can you make buf big enough to avoid that ?
And by the way could it be called something else than 'buf' ?
See exemple here :
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1/source/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c#L690
> + dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
> if (WARN_ON(!dev))
> return -ENOMEM;
> boot_display = node;
> @@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
> }
>
> for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
> - char *buf[14];
> if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
> node == boot_display)
> continue;
> - ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d", display_number++);
> + ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
> display_number++);
> if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
> continue;
> of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
Re: [PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
Am 19.01.23 um 10:53 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
devices.
Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann
Thanks again for taking care of this issue.
---
v2: Update the device name format
---
drivers/of/platform.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
struct platform_device *dev;
- int display_number = 1;
+ int display_number = 0;
+ char buf[14];
+ char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
int ret;
/* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
@@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
!of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL))
continue;
- dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
NULL);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
+ if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
+ continue;
+ dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
if (WARN_ON(!dev))
return -ENOMEM;
boot_display = node;
@@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
}
for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
- char *buf[14];
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
node == boot_display)
continue;
- ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d", display_number++);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
continue;
of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[PATCH v2] of: Fix of platform build on powerpc due to bad of disaply code
The commit 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
breaks build because of wrong argument to snprintf. That certainly
avoids the runtime error but is not the intended outcome.
Also use standard device name format of-display.N for all created
devices.
Fixes: 2d681d6a23a1 ("of: Make of framebuffer devices unique")
Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek
---
v2: Update the device name format
---
drivers/of/platform.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
index f2a5d679a324..8c1b1de22036 100644
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -525,7 +525,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
struct platform_device *dev;
- int display_number = 1;
+ int display_number = 0;
+ char buf[14];
+ char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
int ret;
/* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
@@ -556,7 +558,10 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
!of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL))
continue;
- dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display",
NULL);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
+ if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
+ continue;
+ dev = of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
if (WARN_ON(!dev))
return -ENOMEM;
boot_display = node;
@@ -564,10 +569,9 @@ static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
}
for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
- char *buf[14];
if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
node == boot_display)
continue;
- ret = snprintf(buf, "of-display-%d", display_number++);
+ ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format,
display_number++);
if (ret >= sizeof(buf))
continue;
of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
--
2.35.3
