Re: [PATCH v8 11/45] powerpc/powernv: Track M64 segment consumption

2016-04-19 Thread Gavin Shan
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:09:45PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 02/17/2016 02:43 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>When unplugging PCI devices, their parent PEs might be offline.
>>The consumed M64 resource by the PEs should be released at that
>>time. As we track M32 segment consumption, this introduces an
>>array to the PHB to track the mapping between M64 segment and
>>PE number.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan 
>
>
>Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy 
>
>but it would not hurt to mention in the commit log why M64 segment is not
>tracked/setup by the existing (at this point, at least)
>pnv_ioda_setup_one_res().
>

Right, I'll add something for it to the commit log in next revision, thanks!

>
>>---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 10 --
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h  |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c 
>>b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>index 7330a73..fc0374a 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda2_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, 
>>bool all)
>>  phb->ioda.total_pe_num) {
>>  pe = >ioda.pe_array[i];
>>
>>+ phb->ioda.m64_segmap[pe->pe_number] = pe->pe_number;
>>  if (!master_pe) {
>>  pe->flags |= PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER;
>>  INIT_LIST_HEAD(>slaves);
>>@@ -3245,7 +3246,7 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
>>device_node *np,
>>  {
>>  struct pci_controller *hose;
>>  struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>- unsigned long size, m32map_off, pemap_off, iomap_off = 0;
>>+ unsigned long size, m64map_off, m32map_off, pemap_off, iomap_off = 0;
>>  const __be64 *prop64;
>>  const __be32 *prop32;
>>  int i, len;
>>@@ -3332,6 +,8 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
>>device_node *np,
>>
>>  /* Allocate aux data & arrays. We don't have IO ports on PHB3 */
>>  size = _ALIGN_UP(phb->ioda.total_pe_num / 8, sizeof(unsigned long));
>>+ m64map_off = size;
>>+ size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(phb->ioda.m64_segmap[0]);
>>  m32map_off = size;
>>  size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(phb->ioda.m32_segmap[0]);
>>  if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
>>@@ -3342,9 +3345,12 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
>>device_node *np,
>>  size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(struct pnv_ioda_pe);
>>  aux = memblock_virt_alloc(size, 0);
>>  phb->ioda.pe_alloc = aux;
>>+ phb->ioda.m64_segmap = aux + m64map_off;
>>  phb->ioda.m32_segmap = aux + m32map_off;
>>- for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++)
>>+ for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++) {
>>+ phb->ioda.m64_segmap[i] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>  phb->ioda.m32_segmap[i] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>+ }
>>  if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
>>  phb->ioda.io_segmap = aux + iomap_off;
>>  for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++)
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h 
>>b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>index 36c4965..866a5ea 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct pnv_phb {
>>  struct pnv_ioda_pe  *pe_array;
>>
>>  /* M32 & IO segment maps */
>>+ int *m64_segmap;
>>  int *m32_segmap;
>>  int *io_segmap;
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Alexey
>

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [PATCH v8 11/45] powerpc/powernv: Track M64 segment consumption

2016-04-13 Thread Alexey Kardashevskiy

On 02/17/2016 02:43 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:

When unplugging PCI devices, their parent PEs might be offline.
The consumed M64 resource by the PEs should be released at that
time. As we track M32 segment consumption, this introduces an
array to the PHB to track the mapping between M64 segment and
PE number.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan 



Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy 

but it would not hurt to mention in the commit log why M64 segment is not 
tracked/setup by the existing (at this point, at least) 
pnv_ioda_setup_one_res().




---
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 10 --
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h  |  1 +
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 7330a73..fc0374a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda2_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool 
all)
phb->ioda.total_pe_num) {
pe = >ioda.pe_array[i];

+   phb->ioda.m64_segmap[pe->pe_number] = pe->pe_number;
if (!master_pe) {
pe->flags |= PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(>slaves);
@@ -3245,7 +3246,7 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
device_node *np,
  {
struct pci_controller *hose;
struct pnv_phb *phb;
-   unsigned long size, m32map_off, pemap_off, iomap_off = 0;
+   unsigned long size, m64map_off, m32map_off, pemap_off, iomap_off = 0;
const __be64 *prop64;
const __be32 *prop32;
int i, len;
@@ -3332,6 +,8 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
device_node *np,

/* Allocate aux data & arrays. We don't have IO ports on PHB3 */
size = _ALIGN_UP(phb->ioda.total_pe_num / 8, sizeof(unsigned long));
+   m64map_off = size;
+   size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(phb->ioda.m64_segmap[0]);
m32map_off = size;
size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(phb->ioda.m32_segmap[0]);
if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
@@ -3342,9 +3345,12 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
device_node *np,
size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(struct pnv_ioda_pe);
aux = memblock_virt_alloc(size, 0);
phb->ioda.pe_alloc = aux;
+   phb->ioda.m64_segmap = aux + m64map_off;
phb->ioda.m32_segmap = aux + m32map_off;
-   for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++)
+   for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++) {
+   phb->ioda.m64_segmap[i] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
phb->ioda.m32_segmap[i] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
+   }
if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
phb->ioda.io_segmap = aux + iomap_off;
for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
index 36c4965..866a5ea 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct pnv_phb {
struct pnv_ioda_pe  *pe_array;

/* M32 & IO segment maps */
+   int *m64_segmap;
int *m32_segmap;
int *io_segmap;





--
Alexey
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

[PATCH v8 11/45] powerpc/powernv: Track M64 segment consumption

2016-02-16 Thread Gavin Shan
When unplugging PCI devices, their parent PEs might be offline.
The consumed M64 resource by the PEs should be released at that
time. As we track M32 segment consumption, this introduces an
array to the PHB to track the mapping between M64 segment and
PE number.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan 
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 10 --
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h  |  1 +
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 7330a73..fc0374a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda2_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool 
all)
phb->ioda.total_pe_num) {
pe = >ioda.pe_array[i];
 
+   phb->ioda.m64_segmap[pe->pe_number] = pe->pe_number;
if (!master_pe) {
pe->flags |= PNV_IODA_PE_MASTER;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(>slaves);
@@ -3245,7 +3246,7 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
device_node *np,
 {
struct pci_controller *hose;
struct pnv_phb *phb;
-   unsigned long size, m32map_off, pemap_off, iomap_off = 0;
+   unsigned long size, m64map_off, m32map_off, pemap_off, iomap_off = 0;
const __be64 *prop64;
const __be32 *prop32;
int i, len;
@@ -3332,6 +,8 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
device_node *np,
 
/* Allocate aux data & arrays. We don't have IO ports on PHB3 */
size = _ALIGN_UP(phb->ioda.total_pe_num / 8, sizeof(unsigned long));
+   m64map_off = size;
+   size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(phb->ioda.m64_segmap[0]);
m32map_off = size;
size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(phb->ioda.m32_segmap[0]);
if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
@@ -3342,9 +3345,12 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
device_node *np,
size += phb->ioda.total_pe_num * sizeof(struct pnv_ioda_pe);
aux = memblock_virt_alloc(size, 0);
phb->ioda.pe_alloc = aux;
+   phb->ioda.m64_segmap = aux + m64map_off;
phb->ioda.m32_segmap = aux + m32map_off;
-   for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++)
+   for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++) {
+   phb->ioda.m64_segmap[i] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
phb->ioda.m32_segmap[i] = IODA_INVALID_PE;
+   }
if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA1) {
phb->ioda.io_segmap = aux + iomap_off;
for (i = 0; i < phb->ioda.total_pe_num; i++)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
index 36c4965..866a5ea 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct pnv_phb {
struct pnv_ioda_pe  *pe_array;
 
/* M32 & IO segment maps */
+   int *m64_segmap;
int *m32_segmap;
int *io_segmap;
 
-- 
2.1.0

___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev