Re: [PATCH] ibmvnic: Fix possibly uninitialized old_num_tx_queues variable warning.

2021-03-03 Thread patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue,  2 Mar 2021 20:47:47 +0100 you wrote:
> GCC 7.5 reports:
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c: In function 'ibmvnic_reset_init':
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5373:51: warning: 'old_num_tx_queues' 
> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5373:6: warning: 'old_num_rx_queues' 
> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 
> The variable is initialized only if(reset) and used only if(reset &&
> something) so this is a false positive. However, there is no reason to
> not initialize the variables unconditionally avoiding the warning.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - ibmvnic: Fix possibly uninitialized old_num_tx_queues variable warning.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/6881b07fdd24

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html




Re: [PATCH] ibmvnic: Fix possibly uninitialized old_num_tx_queues variable warning.

2021-03-02 Thread Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Michal Suchanek [msucha...@suse.de] wrote:
> GCC 7.5 reports:
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c: In function 'ibmvnic_reset_init':
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5373:51: warning: 'old_num_tx_queues' 
> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> ../drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c:5373:6: warning: 'old_num_rx_queues' 
> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 
> The variable is initialized only if(reset) and used only if(reset &&
> something) so this is a false positive. However, there is no reason to
> not initialize the variables unconditionally avoiding the warning.

Yeah, its a false positive, but initializing doesn't hurt.
> 
> Fixes: 635e442f4a48 ("ibmvnic: merge ibmvnic_reset_init and ibmvnic_init")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek 

Reviewed-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu