Re: [PATCH 1/5] PowerPC: Move of_device allocation into of_device.[ch]
On Wednesday 26 September 2007, Joachim Fenkes wrote: Extract generic of_device allocation code from of_platform_device_create() and move it into of_device.[ch], called of_device_alloc(). Also, there's now of_device_free() which puts the device node. This way, bus drivers that build on of_platform (like ibmebus will) can build upon this code instead of reinventing the wheel. Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH 1/5] PowerPC: Move of_device allocation into of_device.[ch]
Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 25.09.2007 16:27:57: The patch looks good to me, especially since you did exactly what I suggested ;-) Yes, our discussions were very productive. Thanks and sorry I forgot to mention your input. Maybe the description should have another sentence in it about what the change is good for. You have that in the 0/5 mail, but that does not go into the changelog, so the information gets lost in the process. Can do. New patch coming right up! Joachim ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Re: [PATCH 1/5] PowerPC: Move of_device allocation into of_device.[ch]
On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Joachim Fenkes wrote: Extract generic of_device allocation code from of_platform_device_create() and move it into of_device.[ch], called of_device_alloc(). Also, there's now of_device_free() which puts the device node. Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/asm-powerpc/of_device.h | 4 ++ include/linux/of_device.h | 5 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/of_device.c | 80 + arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c | 70 +--- 4 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) Sorry I didn't review the patches earlier when you sent them in private. The patch looks good to me, especially since you did exactly what I suggested ;-) Maybe the description should have another sentence in it about what the change is good for. You have that in the 0/5 mail, but that does not go into the changelog, so the information gets lost in the process. Arnd ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
