Re: [PATCH kernel v3] powerpc/xive: Drop deregistered irqs
Hello Alexey, >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c >> @@ -632,10 +632,13 @@ void __do_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) >> may_hard_irq_enable(); >> /* And finally process it */ >> - if (unlikely(!irq)) >> + if (unlikely(!irq)) { >> __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.spurious_irqs); >> - else >> - generic_handle_irq(irq); >> + } else if (generic_handle_irq(irq)) { >> + if (ppc_md.orphan_irq) >> + ppc_md.orphan_irq(irq); >> + __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.spurious_irqs); >> + } I think we still have an issue here. The fix is relying on the fact that generic_handle_irq() will return EINVAL if irq desc is NULL, and if this is the case the top interrupt handler will consider we have an orphan interrupt. But, we could also be in the middle of irq_domain->map() and have a partially initialized descriptor if the same interrupt is being remapped on a CPU while another is trying to handle orphans. Calling can_request_irq() (which checks the IRQ_NOREQUEST flag) should close that window and it would be clearer than relying on the return value of generic_handle_irq(). C.
Re: [PATCH kernel v3] powerpc/xive: Drop deregistered irqs
On 17/07/2019 15:00, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: There is a race between releasing an irq on one cpu and fetching it from XIVE on another cpu as there does not seem to be any locking between these, probably because xive_irq_chip::irq_shutdown() is supposed to remove the irq from all queues in the system which it does not do. As a result, when such released irq appears in a queue, we take it from the queue but we do not change the current priority on that cpu and since there is no handler for the irq, EOI is never called and the cpu current priority remains elevated (7 vs. 0xff==unmasked). If another irq is assigned to the same cpu, then that device stops working until irq is moved to another cpu or the device is reset. This adds a new ppc_md.orphan_irq callback which is called if no irq descriptor is found. The XIVE implementation drops the current priority to 0xff which effectively unmasks interrupts in a current CPU. Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater Of course I missed this: Fixes: 243e25112d06 ("powerpc/xive: Native exploitation of the XIVE interrupt controller") --- Changes: v3: * added a comment above xive_orphan_irq() v2: * added ppc_md.orphan_irq --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h | 3 +++ arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 9 ++--- arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 18 ++ 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h index c43d6eca9edd..6cc14e28e89a 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ struct machdep_calls { /* Return an irq, or 0 to indicate there are none pending. */ unsigned int(*get_irq)(void); + /* Drops irq if it does not have a valid descriptor */ + void(*orphan_irq)(unsigned int irq); + /* PCI stuff */ /* Called after allocating resources */ void(*pcibios_fixup)(void); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c index bc68c53af67c..b4e06d05bdba 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c @@ -632,10 +632,13 @@ void __do_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) may_hard_irq_enable(); /* And finally process it */ - if (unlikely(!irq)) + if (unlikely(!irq)) { __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.spurious_irqs); - else - generic_handle_irq(irq); + } else if (generic_handle_irq(irq)) { + if (ppc_md.orphan_irq) + ppc_md.orphan_irq(irq); + __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.spurious_irqs); + } trace_irq_exit(regs); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c index 082c7e1c20f0..17e696b2d71b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c @@ -283,6 +283,23 @@ static unsigned int xive_get_irq(void) return irq; } +/* + * Handles the case when a target CPU catches an interrupt which is being shut + * down on another CPU. generic_handle_irq() returns an error in such case + * and then the orphan_irq() handler restores the CPPR to reenable interrupts. + * + * Without orphan_irq() and valid irq_desc, there is no other way to restore + * the CPPR. This executes on a CPU which caught the interrupt. + */ +static void xive_orphan_irq(unsigned int irq) +{ + struct xive_cpu *xc = __this_cpu_read(xive_cpu); + + xc->cppr = 0xff; + out_8(xive_tima + xive_tima_offset + TM_CPPR, 0xff); + DBG_VERBOSE("orphan_irq: irq %d, adjusting CPPR to 0xff\n", irq); +} + /* * After EOI'ing an interrupt, we need to re-check the queue * to see if another interrupt is pending since multiple @@ -1419,6 +1436,7 @@ bool __init xive_core_init(const struct xive_ops *ops, void __iomem *area, u32 o xive_irq_priority = max_prio; ppc_md.get_irq = xive_get_irq; + ppc_md.orphan_irq = xive_orphan_irq; __xive_enabled = true; pr_devel("Initializing host..\n"); -- Alexey
Re: [PATCH kernel v3] powerpc/xive: Drop deregistered irqs
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 15:00 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > There is a race between releasing an irq on one cpu and fetching it > from XIVE on another cpu as there does not seem to be any locking between > these, probably because xive_irq_chip::irq_shutdown() is supposed to > remove the irq from all queues in the system which it does not do. > > As a result, when such released irq appears in a queue, we take it > from the queue but we do not change the current priority on that cpu and > since there is no handler for the irq, EOI is never called and the cpu > current priority remains elevated (7 vs. 0xff==unmasked). If another irq > is assigned to the same cpu, then that device stops working until irq > is moved to another cpu or the device is reset. > > This adds a new ppc_md.orphan_irq callback which is called if no irq > descriptor is found. The XIVE implementation drops the current priority > to 0xff which effectively unmasks interrupts in a current CPU. Better. Now, you should proably add orphan_irq as a separate patch, and it wouldn't hurt to make other PICs like XICS also provide it :-) They are less likely to hit due to the absence of queuing but I suppose the theorical race exists. Cheers, Ben. > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy > Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater > --- > Changes: > v3: > * added a comment above xive_orphan_irq() > > v2: > * added ppc_md.orphan_irq > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h | 3 +++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 9 ++--- > arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c | 18 ++ > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h > index c43d6eca9edd..6cc14e28e89a 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h > @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ struct machdep_calls { > /* Return an irq, or 0 to indicate there are none pending. */ > unsigned int(*get_irq)(void); > > + /* Drops irq if it does not have a valid descriptor */ > + void(*orphan_irq)(unsigned int irq); > + > /* PCI stuff */ > /* Called after allocating resources */ > void(*pcibios_fixup)(void); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c > index bc68c53af67c..b4e06d05bdba 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c > @@ -632,10 +632,13 @@ void __do_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) > may_hard_irq_enable(); > > /* And finally process it */ > - if (unlikely(!irq)) > + if (unlikely(!irq)) { > __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.spurious_irqs); > - else > - generic_handle_irq(irq); > + } else if (generic_handle_irq(irq)) { > + if (ppc_md.orphan_irq) > + ppc_md.orphan_irq(irq); > + __this_cpu_inc(irq_stat.spurious_irqs); > + } > > trace_irq_exit(regs); > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c > b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c > index 082c7e1c20f0..17e696b2d71b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/common.c > @@ -283,6 +283,23 @@ static unsigned int xive_get_irq(void) > return irq; > } > > +/* > + * Handles the case when a target CPU catches an interrupt which is being > shut > + * down on another CPU. generic_handle_irq() returns an error in such case > + * and then the orphan_irq() handler restores the CPPR to reenable > interrupts. > + * > + * Without orphan_irq() and valid irq_desc, there is no other way to restore > + * the CPPR. This executes on a CPU which caught the interrupt. > + */ > +static void xive_orphan_irq(unsigned int irq) > +{ > + struct xive_cpu *xc = __this_cpu_read(xive_cpu); > + > + xc->cppr = 0xff; > + out_8(xive_tima + xive_tima_offset + TM_CPPR, 0xff); > + DBG_VERBOSE("orphan_irq: irq %d, adjusting CPPR to 0xff\n", irq); > +} > + > /* > * After EOI'ing an interrupt, we need to re-check the queue > * to see if another interrupt is pending since multiple > @@ -1419,6 +1436,7 @@ bool __init xive_core_init(const struct xive_ops *ops, > void __iomem *area, u32 o > xive_irq_priority = max_prio; > > ppc_md.get_irq = xive_get_irq; > + ppc_md.orphan_irq = xive_orphan_irq; > __xive_enabled = true; > > pr_devel("Initializing host..\n");