Re: [PATCH v1] powerpc: Make setjmp/longjump signature standard

2020-03-27 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:45:21PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Subject line, change longjump to longjmp
> 
> Le 27/03/2020 à 11:07, Clement Courbet a écrit :
> > Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
> > non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has been
> > worked around by adding -ffreestanding to the compile flags.
> > 
> > The implementation looks like it only ever propagates the value
> > (in longjmp) or sets it to 1 (in setjmp), and we only call longjmp
> > with integer parameters.
> > 
> > This allows removing -ffreestanding from the compilation flags.
> > 
> > Context:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1214060
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1216174
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet 
> > ---
> >   arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h | 6 --
> >   arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile   | 3 ---
> >   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h 
> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
> > index e9f81bb3f83b..84bb0d140d59 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
> > @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
> >   #define JMP_BUF_LEN23
> > -extern long setjmp(long *) __attribute__((returns_twice));
> > -extern void longjmp(long *, long) __attribute__((noreturn));
> > +typedef long *jmp_buf;
> 
> Do we need that new opaque typedef ? Why not just keep long * ?

Yes, otherwise the warning comes back:

In file included from arch/powerpc/kexec/crash.c:25:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:10:12: error: declaration of built-in 
function 'setjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf' type, commonly 
provided in the header . [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
extern int setjmp(long *env) __attribute__((returns_twice));
   ^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:11:13: error: declaration of built-in 
function 'longjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf' type, commonly 
provided in the header . [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
extern void longjmp(long *env, int val) __attribute__((noreturn));
^
2 errors generated.

> > +
> > +extern int setjmp(jmp_buf env) __attribute__((returns_twice));
> > +extern void longjmp(jmp_buf env, int val) __attribute__((noreturn));
> >   #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_SETJMP_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> > index 378f6108a414..86380c69f5ce 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> > @@ -3,9 +3,6 @@
> >   # Makefile for the linux kernel.
> >   #
> > -# Avoid clang warnings around longjmp/setjmp declarations
> > -CFLAGS_crash.o += -ffreestanding
> > -
> >   obj-y += core.o crash.o core_$(BITS).o
> >   obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)   += relocate_32.o
> > 
> 
> Christophe


Re: [PATCH v1] powerpc: Make setjmp/longjump signature standard

2020-03-27 Thread Christophe Leroy

Subject line, change longjump to longjmp

Le 27/03/2020 à 11:07, Clement Courbet a écrit :

Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has been
worked around by adding -ffreestanding to the compile flags.

The implementation looks like it only ever propagates the value
(in longjmp) or sets it to 1 (in setjmp), and we only call longjmp
with integer parameters.

This allows removing -ffreestanding from the compilation flags.

Context:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1214060
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1216174

Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet 
---
  arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h | 6 --
  arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile   | 3 ---
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h 
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
index e9f81bb3f83b..84bb0d140d59 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
  
  #define JMP_BUF_LEN23
  
-extern long setjmp(long *) __attribute__((returns_twice));

-extern void longjmp(long *, long) __attribute__((noreturn));
+typedef long *jmp_buf;


Do we need that new opaque typedef ? Why not just keep long * ?


+
+extern int setjmp(jmp_buf env) __attribute__((returns_twice));
+extern void longjmp(jmp_buf env, int val) __attribute__((noreturn));
  
  #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_SETJMP_H */

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
index 378f6108a414..86380c69f5ce 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
@@ -3,9 +3,6 @@
  # Makefile for the linux kernel.
  #
  
-# Avoid clang warnings around longjmp/setjmp declarations

-CFLAGS_crash.o += -ffreestanding
-
  obj-y += core.o crash.o core_$(BITS).o
  
  obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)		+= relocate_32.o




Christophe


Re: [PATCH v1] powerpc: Make setjmp/longjump signature standard

2020-03-27 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:10:44AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:08 AM Clement Courbet  wrote:
> >
> > Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
> > non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has been
> > worked around by adding -ffreestanding to the compile flags.
> >
> > The implementation looks like it only ever propagates the value
> > (in longjmp) or sets it to 1 (in setjmp), and we only call longjmp
> > with integer parameters.
> >
> > This allows removing -ffreestanding from the compilation flags.
> >
> > Context:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1214060
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1216174
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet 

Thanks for fixing this properly, not really sure why I did not think of
this in the first place. I guess my thought was the warning makes it
seem like clang is going to ignore the kernel's implementation of
setjmp/longjmp but I can't truly remember.

> Hi Clement, thanks for the patch! Would you mind sending a V2 that
> included a similar fix to arch/powerpc/xmon/Makefile?

Agreed.

> For context, this was the original patch:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=aea447141c7e7824b81b49acd1bc78
> which was then modified to:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c9029ef9c95765e7b63c4d9aa780674447db1ec0
> 
> So on your V2, if you include in the commit message, the line:
> 
> Fixes c9029ef9c957 ("powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp")
> 
> then that will help our LTS branch maintainers back port it to the
> appropriate branches.

The tags should be:

Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.14+
Fixes: c9029ef9c957 ("powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp")

that way it explicitly gets picked up for stable, rather than Sasha's
AUTOSEL process, which could miss it.

With the xmon/Makefile -ffreestanding removed and the tags updated,
consider this:

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor 
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor 

Cheers,
Nathan


Re: [PATCH v1] powerpc: Make setjmp/longjump signature standard

2020-03-27 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:08 AM Clement Courbet  wrote:
>
> Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
> non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has been
> worked around by adding -ffreestanding to the compile flags.
>
> The implementation looks like it only ever propagates the value
> (in longjmp) or sets it to 1 (in setjmp), and we only call longjmp
> with integer parameters.
>
> This allows removing -ffreestanding from the compilation flags.
>
> Context:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1214060
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1216174
>
> Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet 

Hi Clement, thanks for the patch! Would you mind sending a V2 that
included a similar fix to arch/powerpc/xmon/Makefile?

For context, this was the original patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=aea447141c7e7824b81b49acd1bc78
which was then modified to:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c9029ef9c95765e7b63c4d9aa780674447db1ec0

So on your V2, if you include in the commit message, the line:

Fixes c9029ef9c957 ("powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp")

then that will help our LTS branch maintainers back port it to the
appropriate branches.

>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h | 6 --
>  arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile   | 3 ---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h 
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
> index e9f81bb3f83b..84bb0d140d59 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
>
>  #define JMP_BUF_LEN23
>
> -extern long setjmp(long *) __attribute__((returns_twice));
> -extern void longjmp(long *, long) __attribute__((noreturn));
> +typedef long *jmp_buf;
> +
> +extern int setjmp(jmp_buf env) __attribute__((returns_twice));
> +extern void longjmp(jmp_buf env, int val) __attribute__((noreturn));
>
>  #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_SETJMP_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> index 378f6108a414..86380c69f5ce 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/Makefile
> @@ -3,9 +3,6 @@
>  # Makefile for the linux kernel.
>  #
>
> -# Avoid clang warnings around longjmp/setjmp declarations
> -CFLAGS_crash.o += -ffreestanding
> -
>  obj-y  += core.o crash.o core_$(BITS).o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)+= relocate_32.o
> --
> 2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers