Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/perf: Use stack siar instead of mfspr

2021-08-15 Thread kajoljain



On 8/14/21 6:00 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Christophe Leroy  writes:
>> Le 13/08/2021 à 10:29, kajoljain a écrit :
>>>
>>> On 8/13/21 1:54 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:
 Minor optimization in the 'perf_instruction_pointer' function code by
 making use of stack siar instead of mfspr.

 Fixes: 75382aa72f06 ("powerpc/perf: Move code to select SIAR or pt_regs
 into perf_read_regs")
 Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain 
>>>
>>> Please ignore this patch-set as I mentioned wrong version number. I will 
>>> resend
>>> this patch-set again with correct version. Sorry for the confusion.
>>
>> I fear you are creating even more confusion by sending a v1 after sending a 
>> v2 ...
> 
> Yeah in future just reply to the v2 saying "oops I sent v2 instead of
> v1" and leave it at that.

Hi Christophe/Michael,
 Sure I will take care next time.

Thanks,
Kajol Jain

> 
> cheers
> 


Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/perf: Use stack siar instead of mfspr

2021-08-14 Thread Michael Ellerman
Christophe Leroy  writes:
> Le 13/08/2021 à 10:29, kajoljain a écrit :
>> 
>> On 8/13/21 1:54 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:
>>> Minor optimization in the 'perf_instruction_pointer' function code by
>>> making use of stack siar instead of mfspr.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 75382aa72f06 ("powerpc/perf: Move code to select SIAR or pt_regs
>>> into perf_read_regs")
>>> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain 
>> 
>> Please ignore this patch-set as I mentioned wrong version number. I will 
>> resend
>> this patch-set again with correct version. Sorry for the confusion.
>
> I fear you are creating even more confusion by sending a v1 after sending a 
> v2 ...

Yeah in future just reply to the v2 saying "oops I sent v2 instead of
v1" and leave it at that.

cheers


Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/perf: Use stack siar instead of mfspr

2021-08-13 Thread Christophe Leroy




Le 13/08/2021 à 10:29, kajoljain a écrit :



On 8/13/21 1:54 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:

Minor optimization in the 'perf_instruction_pointer' function code by
making use of stack siar instead of mfspr.

Fixes: 75382aa72f06 ("powerpc/perf: Move code to select SIAR or pt_regs
into perf_read_regs")
Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain 


Please ignore this patch-set as I mentioned wrong version number. I will resend
this patch-set again with correct version. Sorry for the confusion.


I fear you are creating even more confusion by sending a v1 after sending a v2 
...

Christophe


Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/perf: Use stack siar instead of mfspr

2021-08-13 Thread kajoljain



On 8/13/21 1:54 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:
> Minor optimization in the 'perf_instruction_pointer' function code by
> making use of stack siar instead of mfspr.
> 
> Fixes: 75382aa72f06 ("powerpc/perf: Move code to select SIAR or pt_regs
> into perf_read_regs")
> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain 

Please ignore this patch-set as I mentioned wrong version number. I will resend
this patch-set again with correct version. Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index bb0ee716de91..1b464aad29c4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -2260,7 +2260,7 @@ unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs 
> *regs)
>   else
>   return regs->nip;
>   } else if (use_siar && siar_valid(regs))
> - return mfspr(SPRN_SIAR) + perf_ip_adjust(regs);
> + return siar + perf_ip_adjust(regs);
>   else if (use_siar)
>   return 0;   // no valid instruction pointer
>   else
>